r/AmericanPolitics 6d ago

Wisconsin Judge Who Helped Illegal Evade ICE Agents Loses Bid To Drop Charges

https://ijr.com/wisconsin-judge-who-helped-illegal-evade-ice-agents-loses-bid-to-drop-charges/
0 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

8

u/StPauliBoi 6d ago

Holy biased headline Batman!

Post history checks out though.

4

u/WillieM96 6d ago

Yeah, I hope u/browncharlie1922 is a bot, otherwise, I need to lower the floor on how dumb I think humans can be.

-2

u/browncharlie1922 6d ago

Why would you hope that?

5

u/2ndprize 6d ago

Because it would make us sad if you are sentient

-2

u/browncharlie1922 6d ago

'us'

I would agree that most of reddit is liberal, users who come here for the safety of the echo chamber and are aghast to others with differing political ideals.

5

u/2ndprize 6d ago

I'm not even a liberal. But the daily caller isn't news. It is a mechanism to launder speculation into headlines.

You're just a tool to spread bullshit

0

u/browncharlie1922 6d ago

Do you think this judge should be charged for helping an illegal alien escape from ICE?

5

u/2ndprize 6d ago

To be perfectly honest I don't think I know enough about it to give you an informed opinion. I havent followed it closely. From a legal perspective I'm not the least bit surprised it wasn't dismissed because that standard is extraordinarily difficult to meet.

0

u/browncharlie1922 6d ago

Thank you for an honest and reasoned reply.

1

u/tolacid 5d ago

ICE has a documented history of arresting people without a warrant, which is a blatant violation of their constitutionally protected rights to due process.

ICE arrived to the courtroom to arrest a man without a warrant while he was attending an unrelated pretrial hearing. Such an arrest requires establishment of probable cause - in this case, reasonable proof that he was in the country illegally. The judge sent ICE to get a warrant to demonstrate said probable cause, as part of the due process protections all persons are entitled to in this country.

No one requested the man be detained until the ICE agents returned. The judge wrapped up the hearing he was there for and sent him on his way. Knowing that people who intended to violate his right to due process were waiting for him in one direction, she sent him out in a different direction.

The worst thing the judge did was attempt to uphold a person's constitutional rights. Which, incidentally, ICE later violated anyway by arresting the man (surprise!) without a warrant.

0

u/browncharlie1922 5d ago

'ICE has a documented history of arresting people without a warrant'

ICE can arrest individuals without a judicial warrant under certain circumstances, such as when they have reason to believe the person is in the country illegally or is committing an immigration violation in their presence.

4

u/WillieM96 6d ago

Not even close. I was a registered republican voter at one point in the not too distant past but had to jump ship when I realized just how debilitatingly stupid the party had become. It wasn't until a few years later that I realized their voter base was even worse.

I'm not liberal. It's just that, compared to what the republican party has devolved into, I appear to be liberal to you. If you spend most of your days raping, torturing, and eating babies, a murderer who kills their victims quickly might appear to be a good person to you.

1

u/uberares 6d ago edited 6d ago

Lmfao, you know what an echo chamber is?? So /conservative who requires flaired users and will ban anyone who doesn’t agree isn’t an echo chamber for safe space?

Laughably hypocritical.

1

u/browncharlie1922 6d ago

I don't know what 'Claire's users' are

r/conservative is openly honest about it being a sub for right wingers only.

Most political subs on Reddit profess to be unbiased and open to all but employ an extreme liberal bias. It's hypocritical.

3

u/uberares 5d ago

Autocorrect has been fixed. 

So one needs only specify and then it can be as contextually and safe spacey as one wants. 

Again, lmfao, that is moving the goalposts. 

0

u/browncharlie1922 5d ago edited 5d ago

So one needs only specify and then it can be as contextually and safe spacey as one wants.

Yes! Subs are allowed to decide for themselves who their user base is.

The goalposts have not moved.

Edit: user blocked me and ran away

2

u/uberares 5d ago

And yet you complained about this one. 

We are thru, I don’t play the circular logic fallacy game.