r/Boxing • u/Brendan_Frost • 1d ago
P4P is Roberto Duran The Greatest at Brawling?
I know brawling has a negative connotation among most boxing pundits. It's often used to describe as a tactic of fighters who favor brute force and slugging due to their lack of finesse and in-ring craftsmanship. However, some people in other forums have claimed that it has its place in boxing, especially in crucial moments that require it.
When it comes to brawling, I often hear that Duran is arguably the best at utilizing it, even though his skillset and defensive skills exceed the stereotypical brawler. Some would even go as far as to claim that he is the most technical and well-rounded brawler in boxing history, as oxymoronic as it may sound. Are there any other fighters who can brawl better than Duran in any place in history?

28
u/SouthernWino Sure the fight was fixed. I fixed it with a right hand. 1d ago
Duran wasn't a brawler. He was a high pressure boxer and liked to work inside. He also had really good defensive skills. Did he get a little dirty and rough? Yes.
11
u/Bruce-7892 1d ago
Wish I was old enough to see the 4 kings era. Now we got Tank vs Jake Paul 😢
9
10
u/stephen27898 1d ago edited 1d ago
No as he wasnt really a brawler. He was actually very technically refined and really had many strings to his bow.
If you want someone who is a brawler you would be looking at someone like Jake Lamotta, Jack Dempsey, Sandy Saddler (he was extremely dirty).
Lamotta used brawling tactics to get a win over someone who many would consider to be the greatest P4P of all time. And unlike Duran he didnt really have any other options. Duran could mix some brawling tactics with boxing, people like Dempsey or Lamotta had one route and one route only to victory.
5
u/VacuousWastrel 1d ago
I wouldn't call saddler a brawler at all - he was a cautious, strategic, technical fighter with good defence. His techniques didn't look pretty (long guard rarely does), and he fouled a lot, but i don't think he intentionally got into brawls.
2
u/stephen27898 1d ago
Maybe im thinking of the wrong guy then. I swear he was the guy who beat Pep by basically just rushing him and jumping in on him.
9
u/Big_Donch YouTube: Big Donch 1d ago
Damn I just woke up and thought the title said RIP Roberto Duran
1
7
u/NWOfourlyfe420 21h ago
Brawling implies reckless offense and limited defense. I’m thinking along the lines of a Rocky and a young undisciplined Pac. You’re gonna keep clipped but you’ll get yours type.
Duran was an artist. Inside fighting, angles, wrestling, guard manipulation, even using his head as a tool. He’s an inside fighter if he had to be categorized
8
u/kushmonATL Inoue and Crawford up next in Sept 🔥💪🏾 1d ago
u/Doofensanshmirtz this one's for yoy
16
u/Doofensanshmirtz Bujia Zapata > Ricardo Lopez 1d ago
About time for people to start thinking of me as that one creep who's obsessed with Duran
3
u/NeoCortex963 Bare Knuckle Boxing baby! 1d ago
Not the only one! Me and you are the number one Duran fanboys lol. I'm a bit too obsessed with defensively skilled aggressive fighters
2
2
u/TemporaryCollar165 20h ago
After reading through these comments, I wonder what everyone’s definition of brawling is? Does it imply technical deficiencies? Is it the willingness to trade and potentially take damage? Or is it just the level of aggression shown?
2
1
1
u/armourofgod666 15h ago
If you want pure brawling, it's probably Aaron Pryor. Duran would switch between outside boxing, mid range, inside fighting. Sometimes he'd box then rhythm change and collide into you etc. Pryor just kinda went after it.
-2
u/Tricky-Ad-4823 1d ago
Duran was extremely technical and great at creating angels. Damn I hate casual fans. They see a fighter come forward and they just assume there is no skill involved
9
u/Brendan_Frost 1d ago
When it comes to brawling, I often hear that Duran is arguably the best at utilizing it, even though his skillset and defensive skills exceed the stereotypical brawler. Some would even go as far as to claim that he is the most technical and well-rounded brawler in boxing history, as oxymoronic as it may sound. Are there any other fighters who can brawl better than Duran in any place in history?
Line 2
-7
72
u/Doofensanshmirtz Bujia Zapata > Ricardo Lopez 1d ago
You really can’t box Durán into one category.
He wasn’t just a brawler, nor strictly a counter-puncher, swarmer, or outboxer. He was simply Durán
Unlike most fighters, his style never fit cleanly into the sport’s archetypes. That’s because, on any given night, against any given opponent, Durán could reinvent himself. He could outbox you with patience and craft, or meet fire with fire and overwhelm you in the trenches. He could slip, weave, and counter with surgical precision, or flip the pressure back onto you until you were the one breaking rhythm.
Tie him up to stall? He’d punish you inside and turn clinches into his own weapon. Try to keep him at bay with the jab? He’d dismantle it, use the same tools against you, and suddenly the fight was on his terms.
That adaptability is what made him unique: he didn’t just brawl, he weaponized every aspect of boxing. Durán cannot be confined to a label. He’s simply Durán, one of the rare fighters in history who transcends styles, who transcends boxing itself
One of the rare fighters who can be labelled as an:
All-Time-Great.