r/ChemicalEngineering Jun 15 '25

Student a relative told me ChemE will eventually be replaced by AI

i have never been so offended.

i’m currently in my second year (bachelor’s) and i had a talk with a relative. they asked why i didn’t do something “useful” like nursing (typical asian mindset). then they said “you know you’ll be replaced by ai anyway in the future, right?” i was so appalled. i’m sure they just dont know what ChemE really is.

how should one even respond to that?

269 Upvotes

146 comments sorted by

723

u/secondchancepleez Jun 15 '25

If chem eng gets replaced by AI then by that point everything has been replaced by AI. That's not an exaggeration.

133

u/mosquem Jun 15 '25

Basically trades and healthcare are going to be the last to go, and at that point we need to be talking about UBI.

62

u/AeliusJS Jun 15 '25

Well, preferably well before that point, and not just when that specific group of 30-40% of people get fucked

18

u/RTRSnk5 Jun 15 '25 edited Jun 15 '25

Society will implode and revert to something akin to that of a few hundred years ago before AI forces the instatement of a UBI.

20

u/andrewrgross Jun 15 '25

I think we're already at the point where we should be talking about UBI.

Also: a hot alternative that doesn't get discussed as much is Universal Basic Services.

UBI is where you give out money so people can buy food, shelter, and healthcare even if they can't find a job that pays for it. UBS is where people can go get food, housing, and healthcare that is free at the point of delivery. It's got pros and cons vs UBI, and I think we should start testing both -- separately and together -- now.

5

u/Pumbaasliferaft Jun 15 '25

In many ways I think we’re almost there already, if you think of all the useless bloated positions there are in the world, whether it’s corporate or public services, sales and manufacturing of wasteful and irrelevant products, pointless services that you just came do without, or simple tasks you now bring in a technician for etc etc etc

In the western world at least, it all seems to be a result of an affluent society

2

u/rasta-ragamuffin Jun 16 '25

I agree. Now is the time. Honestly we should have been talking about this years ago. Even if we had a concrete plan now, it would still take at least another 10 years to implement. It is probably already too late.....

2

u/andrewrgross Jun 16 '25

No matter when the best time might have been, the second best time is right now.

You know what's weird? Do folks remember Andrew Yang's long-shot presidential bid in 2016? The guy went out and said 'Automation is upending the labor market completely, and we should be pursuing some kind of UBI.'

He got kind of clowned on by traditional media, but ended up making it way farther than even Kamala Harris made it in the primary. It seemed like a pretty clear indication that his message was already catching fire, but once he dropped out we all just kind of put that back on a shelf and never revisited it.

Now, here we are NINE YEARS LATER and that political party is wandering around muttering 'What? What do people want?? WHAT SHOULD WE CAMPAIGN ON???'

Maybe Medicaid For All and a UBI? Those ideas were highly popular BEFORE we had a pandemic and an AI explosion. And somehow they're still just sitting on the shelf untouched.

3

u/rasta-ragamuffin Jun 16 '25

Oh I do remember Andrew Yang. I remember thinking his ideas were kind of crazy at the time, and probably not feasible, although I liked and supported them. Whatever happened to him? I wish he would crawl back out of the dark place he's been hiding in and speak up. We need him now more than ever and I think those crazy ideas should be revisited. With a little fine-tuning, they might be more appealing to the blue collar working class as well as all the government and tech workers who have been recently laid off.

2

u/andrewrgross Jun 16 '25

He ran unsuccessfully for mayor of New York, and then spent some time trying to build up a third political party on a platform of democratic reforms and good governance. I'm not sure what he's doing right now, but I wouldn't be surprised if he pops back up around 2028.

2

u/RyszardSchizzerski Jun 17 '25

You mean things like universal healthcare? In the US, we’re going to be lucky if we still have any safety net at all in three years, never mind basic services.

4

u/YesICanMakeMeth PhD - Computational Chemistry & Materials Science Jun 15 '25

I honestly doubt this. Robotics is accelerating and knowledge/reasoning work automation is decelerating or at least leveling off. We're riding the LLM high right now. I think we're going to hit a wall past "throwing together hacky code" and find it's hard to fully replicate an engineers brain, and a few years after that robotics is going to start eating into some of the more repetitive physical labor, as everyone expected a decade ago.

2

u/Shotoken2 Refining/20 YOE Jun 15 '25

Probably at this point, tbh

2

u/indianbaguette Jun 15 '25

whats UBI

22

u/willscuba4food Jun 15 '25

sOcIALiSm.... scary stuff for this sub honestly

1

u/no-im-not-him Jun 16 '25

Yeah, that is why Milton Friedman actually proposed a version of it, right? /s

13

u/ChemBroDude Jun 15 '25

Universal basic income.

1

u/HCTDMCHALLENGER Jun 18 '25

Only problem is that it stops us being consumers. If everyone has only enough money for food and other essentials then who is buying all the new iphones? Stuff for hobbies? Entertainment? Etc. that stuff may need to be included.

1

u/ChemBroDude Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25

I mean I like earning and what not, but I guess that’s a privilege since I get to be passionate about my field and work which many people aren’t. UBI is never happening.

1

u/HCTDMCHALLENGER Jun 18 '25

Agreed, it would likely collapse the economy

1

u/JustCallMeChristo Jun 16 '25

I truly believe healthcare will be one of the first to go.

You can already put your blood test into chat GPT and it’ll give you a more accurate health readout than most primary care physicians. Surgical robots are also currently being made. Give it 200 years and I don’t even think doctors will be a profession anymore, giving way to something like a “Surgical Robot Technician”.

The money is there, the motivation to replace the current system is there, and the means are now there with AI. The only things that stand in the way are 1) lobbyists and 2) people employed by the medical industry.

1

u/Level-Connection6672 19d ago

Electrical engineering is going to be the last. It is hard to teach ai math behind electrical engineering.

63

u/thatthatguy Jun 15 '25

When chemical engineers can convince the crusty old guy who knows how to operate the undocumented machine in the old part of the plant to show you how to start it up, including the part where you have to light a candle and pour a few teaspoons of denatured alcohol in the mix, then we will deserve to be replaced.

12

u/Admirable-Subject-46 Jun 15 '25

Good luck automating that process, hasn’t been done in the last 100 years

11

u/Cauliflowwer Jun 15 '25

This comment spoke to me so much. The equipment I'm in charge of is over 10 years older than me and there's like 2 technicians that understand it perfectly. And I just can't get them to tell me how to work the magic they work so that I can document it. They just shrug and say it's just 'what they feel like they should do' for any given problem. Gah.

6

u/Kool_Aid_Infinity Jun 15 '25

Gotta praise the omnissiah 

-14

u/TechnicianUnlikely99 Jun 15 '25

Almost every white collar career says the same thing. Programmers, engineers, lawyers, doctors etc. All say “if my field gets replaced then everything is getting replaced”.

You’re all just an echo chamber of denial

-3

u/WorkinSlave Jun 15 '25

Not sure why downvoted. Its been studied. Most people think AI is coming, but not for them.

3

u/Killagina Jun 16 '25

It’s downvoted because everyone that knows anything about AI knows it’s not coming for jobs anytime soon.

1

u/HellenKilher Jun 17 '25

Why do you think this? There are like hundreds of start ups right now and their sole goal is to replace certain jobs with AI.

1

u/Killagina Jun 17 '25

Because AI can’t do anything novel and can’t think. The fundamentals of AI are not there to replace any thing remotely complex like

1

u/HellenKilher Jun 17 '25

If you think that AI can’t do anything “novel” you just haven’t been using the newer models. These chatbots are no longer just LLMs, they are also “reasoning models” and we are getting to the point where we don’t even understand why it works as well as it does.

If you are to argue that it can’t do anything novel then that means that neither can we. It essentially functions the way we do. We give it a brain (the neural network) and we give it context (literally any piece of data we can, as in everything on the internet), and it just seems to work, and it figures things out that it hasn’t seen before.

If you genuinely think that these tools “can’t do anything complex,” you are unfortunately mistaken. Hopefully the growth of AI plateaus soon, but it’s hard to tell. Fortunately it seems like we’re running out of context (data) to train them on.

Universities and companies are funneling all their resources into AI right now. Professors and people I’ve worked for are all into AI research. At the very least the idea of what jobs are in the near future will change, probably quite drastically.

1

u/Killagina Jun 17 '25

If you think that AI can’t do anything “novel” you just haven’t been using the newer models. These chatbots are no longer just LLMs, they are also “reasoning models” and we are getting to the point where we don’t even understand why it works as well as it does.

We absolutely understand very deeply how it works. You seem to have read too much scifi. The most advanced reasoning models have a "thinking" step where they just add extra tokens before giving you the final token.

If you genuinely think that these tools “can’t do anything complex,” you are unfortunately mistaken. Hopefully the growth of AI plateaus soon, but it’s hard to tell. Fortunately it seems like we’re running out of context (data) to train them on.

Again, just no. This has been studied and Apple just released a great paper on it this week. The very best reasoning models completely collapse in terms of accuracy when dealing with complex problems. They can not generalize problem solving capabilities for planning tasks.

Reasoning models actually suck at simple tasks - LLMs completely out perform them. Reasoning models continue to get simple problems wrong. They only help a bit during medium complexity models.

Reasoning models literally give up on complex problems. They stopped thinking BELOW their token limit, and even when given the algorithm to solve logic puzzles they couldn't do it. They do not "think" like you claim they do - AGI isn't here yet and it isn't even close to be here.

Our findings reveal fundamental limitations in current models: despite sophisticated self-reflection mechanisms, these models fail to develop generalizable reasoning capabilities beyond certain complexity thresholds

and

Particularly concerning is the counterintuitive reduction in reasoning effort as problems approach critical complexity, suggesting an inherent compute scaling limit in LRMs. Our detailed analysis of reasoning traces further exposed complexity dependent reasoning patterns, from inefficient “overthinking” on simpler problems to complete failure on complex ones

-4

u/TechnicianUnlikely99 Jun 15 '25

People think their downvotes will save their job lol

3

u/secondchancepleez Jun 16 '25

People aren't downvoting you because they're offended. They're downvoting you because you missed the whole point of my statement. AI may very well take over engineering and other very technical fields like that, however, by the time that has happened more rote and less technical jobs will have already been lost to AI.

I'm basically saying that when the day comes that AI has taken engineering over, it will be okay because by that point most of humanity will be out of a job anyway, which is simply not sustainable and therefore governments will be forced to come up with solutions.

-1

u/TechnicianUnlikely99 Jun 16 '25

I assure you if that happens it is not going to be pretty.

-1

u/LTRand Jun 16 '25

Design/R&D or operations engineering?

Operations engineering is just a smart robot away from automation. Design/R&D is probably still a generational leap or two away, as with any other field.

2

u/secondchancepleez Jun 16 '25

As an engineer who has worked in both R&D and in operations, you are very wrong and very clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

-4

u/HellenKilher Jun 15 '25

Yup. Programmers were the first to say this. It now looks like they are actively being replaced.

We’re on Reddit so an echo chamber is expected, but I encourage people to try to think about this more objectively. There is no one field that is “special” in the sense that it is AI-proof. If you can nurture a human baby to grow up and learn something, you can do the same with AI. That’s basically the simplest way you can think about it.

So it’s not really the subject that matters but the depth in which you understand it. Entry level positions are disappearing, and that’s across the board.

174

u/AnxietyScary4494 Jun 15 '25

Tell them their job is also at risk of being replaced by AI.

23

u/daphnemadness Jun 15 '25

This is the best answer anyone can give.

-7

u/TreacleFine5564 Jun 15 '25

Not really. Example easy rebuttal: “I’m already years into my career and pretty much locked in. You’re paying to just start out in your’s.”

I don’t agree with the relative, but let’s not give delusional advice lol

5

u/daphnemadness Jun 15 '25

That’s not a delusional answer. This is just a simple way to tell someone to mind their own business lol

-3

u/TreacleFine5564 Jun 15 '25

Then that’s not actually addressing the matter at hand. That’s just being petty. If you just want them to butt out, be direct, respectfully cuz they’re still a relative and older.

3

u/daphnemadness Jun 15 '25

I was just pointing out that maybe the relative is also being petty, but otherwise you are right. I just found this comment funny lol

103

u/Low-Duty Jun 15 '25

Good, i’m tired of working

19

u/twostroke1 Process Controls/8yrs Jun 15 '25

Seriously. Can it hurry up then.

2

u/REDACTED3560 Jun 16 '25

Do you think the powers that be will keep you around if you can’t provide value?

3

u/Fluid-Leg-8777 Jun 17 '25

I think our endgame as the proletariat is to vote the first politician that proposes minimum universal income, im sure that once jobs start being replaced on mass it wont take long until those kind of politicians start popping all around the world

So get a good savings account to weather the storm

69

u/OwnerOfABouncyBall Jun 15 '25

Where I asked AI on topics related to ChemE I often got really mediocre and inaccurate result.. Rather used it for a second opionion but I would never rely on it. I think we are still far away from the point where AI will replace chemical engineers. It will maybe happen one day but not in the next 10 years.

9

u/ooo-ooo-oooyea 15 Years, Corporate Renewable Energy SME Jun 15 '25

I was making a presentation, and my company has an A/I plugin for powerpoint.

I received such great suggestions as "A Diagram of a Machine" for a P&ID, and "A Straight Line" for a suction / discharge flow curve.

A/I running plant well be uh special.

Not to trash it, I think it could really help automate MOC type items and other paper work, but its a really long way off for any significant impact.

69

u/Nask_13 Jun 15 '25

Just say, "Okay, so be it then," and move on

29

u/sew3r_r4t Jun 15 '25

haha i hope it was that easy, these were the people who doubted me from the start, just waiting for me to fail. i am working on it tho !

13

u/juliuspersi Jun 15 '25

Chem eng here, as a product manager, if the clients doesn't know what they need, of course the AI will know.

34

u/RebelWithoutASauce Jun 15 '25

I've heard people say that "AI is going to replace your job!" about nearly every job, including my own design-heavy job industrial automation/systems engineering job.

I think it's a result of a combination of 2 things:

  1. Not understanding what my job is. 
  2. Not understanding what 'AI" is or it's capabilities. 

Sometimes  I think it is a sort of projection; people have anxiety about their own job becoming obsolete and when I see someone who doesn't feel that way they try  to make them feel the same insecurity.

37

u/anothercicada Jun 15 '25 edited Jun 15 '25

Well, at least we won't be one of the firsts to get replaced. You're your own person. Don't bother with useless commentary.

Plus, it'll be a LONG time if ever until AIs actually get intelligent. They're trained on past data. They match contexts. Are they good at it? Yes. Very good in fact. But if a novel situation comes up, something that has never happened before or never got fed into this AI, it will freeze. Either that or it will give a confident answer that's dead wrong. Until they do that. I say we, and many other people, will do just fine

2

u/lod001 Jun 16 '25

Can't train on past data when all the knowledge is kept as experience by operators, and the P&IDs are all a decade out of date, if they even exist!

15

u/swolekinson Jun 15 '25

Chemical engineering predates the computer. But the work done by 19th century chemical engineers would be unrecognizable by 21st century chemical engineers.

This is true across all disciplines, including the medical field quoted by your relative. Because, you know, we don't bloodlet for generic malaise anymore.

Now, could your skills become obsolete quicker? Yes. But everyone's has because we're at a point where technology is changing faster than generations are being born. Transitioning from steady-state to change is rough for molecules and humans.

32

u/BeersLawww Jun 15 '25

I don’t think this has to do with “Asian mindset.” Most Asian people actually support any type of engineering. I can say this because I am Asian and a ChemE major, and no one has told me what you’re saying.

25

u/sew3r_r4t Jun 15 '25

unfortunately most of my family members think like this, they push me to go into medicine. they think of engineers as people who press buttons inside a factory. yes, i’ve been told these exact words

23

u/Kenny__Loggins Jun 15 '25

Don't put too much stock into what they're saying. With your own damn family wishing for your downfall, who needs enemies?

7

u/asiancleopatra Jun 15 '25

So you are a second year and they're still pushing for medicine?

Fuck that.

6

u/Dazzling-Werewolf985 Jun 15 '25

Bro same. To this day my dad still thinks I wanna be a doctor😂I’m in my first yr of chem eng hahaha.

I kinda sympathise with them though because they obviously don’t understand what engineering, especially our kind, entails. My dad’s only point of reference for a “chemical engineer” is likely the guy back in nigeria who mixes cement for £1 an hour

2

u/Otherwise_Internet71 Jun 15 '25

Clinical medicine?LoL typical Asian parents "Only doctors/Civil servants are the best"😆

1

u/crashddr Jul 02 '25

Ohh, and engineer like the guy who drives the train.

1

u/hellonameismyname Jun 15 '25

Chemical engineering opens the door to so many careers that can provide better financial security than medicine for a fraction of the cost and time needed.

10

u/scheav Jun 15 '25

Its a Southeast Asian mindset to be specific, not East Asian.

9

u/Ok_Construction5119 Jun 15 '25

im guessing op is filipino

3

u/BeersLawww Jun 15 '25

I’d say that still has nothing to do with it, I’m southeast Asian (viet) and majority of my family are engineers with an exception of like 2 doctors.. it’s just probably a select few families who still think like that. But anyways, it’s your life, you do what you want.

1

u/DragonPhoenix32 Jun 15 '25

Don't know about that, I'm Indonesian and most working family members are engineers or STEM related like architects.

11

u/bagoetz99 Plant Engineer | Food Manufacturing Jun 15 '25

The truth is, when someone says something like this, there's only really two good ways to approach. You can either calmly inform them that that's a long ways off and why, or you can just take the hit and say "sure!" Personally, I usually opt for the latter here as people that give jabs like that aren't usually interested in being corrected.

23

u/najeckoR Jun 15 '25

Unless Air Separation Units (ASU) become fully autonomous and can trouble shoot problems via AI, I will have job security lol..

10

u/dirtgrub28 Jun 15 '25

of all the processes, this is the MOST likely to get fully automated. they already run without personnel on site 24/7

4

u/Cyrlllc Jun 15 '25

Fully automated systems aren't ai.

4

u/dirtgrub28 Jun 15 '25

fair, i'm just saying that ASUs are pretty simple, which is where AI is going first

1

u/najeckoR Jun 16 '25

What happens when it trips? Someone comes on site. It can be automated to a degree but someone is always getting paid to be on call. If I’m getting paid I’m chillen

5

u/naastiknibba95 Petroleum Refinery/9 years/B.Tech ChE 2016 Jun 16 '25

blud picked the easiest unit as if it was the toughest...

1

u/najeckoR Jun 16 '25

Never said it was hard, just saying only so much can be replaced by AI.

5

u/huffpuffsnuff Jun 15 '25

Tell him to stop letting the bullshit leak from his brain

6

u/Ionic-and-Ironic Jun 15 '25

Your relative doesn’t know what they’re talking about. ChemE has a lot of automation already that is supervised by many engineers… AI can certainly help with design efficiency, but it will not take over unless it’s taken over literally every other labor area too (like nursing).

5

u/Frosty_Cloud_2888 Jun 15 '25

Everything will be replaced by AI /s

6

u/CharlieCheesecake101 Jun 15 '25

Have you ever tried to use AI to do a basic engineering hw problem? It gets it wrong half the time dw your job isn’t going anywhere - from a fellow engineer

4

u/SadQlown Jun 15 '25

I can assure you most chemical engineers are wishing for the day our jobs get replaced with AI

4

u/TeddyPSmith Jun 15 '25

ChemE’s with actual knowledge may be replaced with ChemE’s that only know how to use AI and can’t decipher fact from fiction. Most likely scenario IMO

4

u/awaal3 Jun 15 '25

Its a shallow elitist mindset. No industry is safe from the AI innovation. I guess nursing might be “safer” but not NPs, just the grunt workers like RNs that take blood and replace catheters.

Live life man - cheme is a good degree and you can translate it a lot of different things.

4

u/External-Wrap-4612 Jun 15 '25 edited Jun 15 '25

I work in a power plant(somewhat similar), chemical ain't gonna be replaced by ai unless they want explosion left and right due to computer error. Computers can be supplemental but too dangerous leaving everything to the computer.

Chemical engr is mostly about chemical processes using thermo and fluid knowledge. I think ur relative is thinking ai doing chemical composition looool... great, when they find it then they need chemical engineer to process it so no explosion.

5

u/pack2k Jun 15 '25

Did you say…. Yeah, well stupid relatives will be replaced by AI too…. So there!

4

u/Lurkerwasntaken Jun 15 '25

They do realize the AI has to be trained to understand a chemical process, right? Like people, AI has to get fed the correct information in order for it to give accurate responses. It might be able to do small things starting out like provide code to automate a specific thing in a chemical process, but it will be a while before ChemEs are obsolete. If you work in production (process, production, or automation engineers), you are helping train the AI. Each chemical process has so many quirks that AI can’t find every single problem on its own.

Like others said, most jobs would be completely replaced by the time ChemEs are obsolete.

4

u/No_Objective1045 Jun 15 '25

All CS majors are trying to gain domain knowledge of physics, mech or ChemE to stay relevant. Studying ChemE will let you have a job longer than other majors.

4

u/Spiritual-Record-69 Jun 16 '25

Just say "unfortunately, you're long dead to witness it."

3

u/Additional_cheme5655 Jun 15 '25

Technically, every job is at risk of being replaced by AI. Adapt and learn to keep being updated with the system. But tbh even I've heard this argument and it's honestly so annoying. As for "useful" majors like nursing, wait till we get robot nurses/doctors, then even their jobs will get replaced by AI.

3

u/msd1994m Pharma/10 Jun 15 '25

I usually tell people I’m excited because AI is another tool that makes engineer’s jobs easier and allows us to push science even further. Ask them what parts of our job will be replaced.

3

u/AbdulRehmanVirk Jun 15 '25

As someone who is planning to work on the development of the models that predict and assist the process engineers to operate plants at the optimum conditions. I am pretty sure that AI will assist engineers to solve problems quicker, instead of replacing them completely. By the time we are replaced completely by the AI, most jobs would already be replaced earlier. As for now, the early adaptors would benefit the most from the AI.

3

u/Rippedlotus Jun 15 '25

Don't think AI will replace ChemE's, but I never thought I'd see engineering roles being shipped overseas and that is happening at an alarming pace right now. EE and ME jobs are heading overseas for cheaper labor.

2

u/OgeeWhiz Jun 15 '25

AI is a tool you need to know how to use. ChE is extremely versatile, don’t worry.

2

u/TechDifficulties99 Jun 15 '25

Went to a conference recently where some of the presentations were about potential applications of AI in the industry, and I was shocked and relieved to hear the conversation following every one of these presentations about the importance of human control, especially in terms of large scale manufacturing operations.

Even when the suggested application was just safety and hazard analysis, which sounds simple enough, the conversation leaned into issues with AI hallucinations and the fact that it would be limited by how much we put into it. People won’t imagine a vessel and insist it’s there. People will consider incidents that logically should never happen, but still could.

I am healthily concerned about AI applications in the future, but unless it can someday tell me the maximum temperature and pressure rise rates during a thermal runaway between components that have never been mixed before, it’s not replacing our jobs

2

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '25

Nursing is the safe bet. Everywhere has nursing. Everywhere doesn’t have chem eng. I moved from Southern California to Missouri to get the right experience to get into traditional chem eng roles.

2

u/ArghBH Jun 15 '25

Slow burn. Graduate, get a high paying job in oil/gas, buy a mansion, buy a super car, and show up at that relative's. Sure, takes a while but worth it?

1

u/sew3r_r4t Jun 15 '25

i think about that almost every day! haha good motivation

2

u/1PrestigeWorldwide11 Jun 15 '25

You can’t fix stupid.  Well maybe someday we can, with AI.

2

u/Oatsee Jun 15 '25

For R&D "AI" will transform the industry but will not replace people fully ever. You will always need people who understand the topic enough to be able to define what you actually want, as well as actually verify accuracy of results.

In industry "AI" will probably never take over. There are so many decade old plants, or plants that dont have enough data recorded to solve all issues. Anyone in industry knows how often something will go wrong that cannot be found by just looking at data.

They have no idea what they're talking about and are definitely projecting. Just such a ignorant thing to say when they have no idea what they are talking about.

2

u/riftwave77 Jun 15 '25

Tell them that they have dishonored their ancestors.

2

u/thewanderer2389 Jun 15 '25

If ChemE is replaced by AI, that would mean that AI has gotten good enough to replace just about every job out there.

2

u/S-I-C-O-N Jun 15 '25

How should you respond... Consider Biological science or Bio-E. Just a super computer mapped the entire human genome and AI is blasting through thousands of organic reactions to develop pharmaceuticals. Although your relative may be correct, it is still a decade or two away and you have an opportunity to grow with the technology.

2

u/sl0w4zn Jun 15 '25

If your parents have a place in the family theater, you can tell them that your relative told you to quit your major.

Next time, tell them to pay for your school and housing if they want a say in your future. Or ignore them. Or figure out what kind of chemE you'll be and explain it to your ignorant relative. Lots of choices here!

Automation has been the fear for underpaying laborious jobs, and AI is the fear for underpaying creative jobs. ChemE is not going to be obsolete because things that break and things that need to be designed are all unique from the last problem. AI can show you a pattern, but as it stands, the solution will be human-made.

2

u/Brainprint Jun 15 '25

They are just closed minded and think their opinion is the only one that matters or is the only answer to any problem.

2

u/volleyballer12345 Jun 15 '25

To a certain extent, hasn't that already been done with the likes of Aspen / Hysys etc? I'm sure there was once a legion of ChemE's who actually knew how to do it all by hand and did it regularly.

2

u/ReynAetherwindt Jun 15 '25

The minute you replace ChemEs with AI, you are taking on personal criminal liability for any potential disaster that ensues.

Now, can AI be used to help make adjustments in process simulations by drawing on existing fluid behavior models, plant designs, and operating conditions to help with research? I'd be surprised if it's not already in the works.

2

u/pharosito Jun 15 '25

They should spend 5 minutes in a control room , not even on the floor of a plant , just in a control room. 5 min.

2

u/brendax Jun 16 '25

Literally nothing has been replaced by AI. It is a pump and dump tech scam like IoT, big data, blockchain, etc

2

u/PerspectiveMuch3647 Jun 16 '25

I was reading the CSB reports just tonight. It just baffles me people think even with our current problems that leaving everything to something inherently not able to take responsibility is the world you’d like to live in. We already have issues from companies mismanagement, bad training, turnover etc. causing preventable death and millions in damages.

2

u/PerspectiveMuch3647 Jun 16 '25

I think your relatives comment comes from not understanding what is actually required to do different types of engineering.

2

u/YT__ Jun 16 '25

"ha ha ha, so true. Good thing we aren't there yet."

Than just never talk to them about degree again.

2

u/Additional_Status178 Jun 17 '25

Retired ChE professor here: if you learn to learn, you'll never be replaced by AI. I tried to use AI to help me make up exam problems. What i got was laughable.

2

u/Skysr70 Jun 18 '25

yeah i think getting my blood pressure read is probably gonna be easier for an ai than optimizing a product synthesis line, hot take

1

u/Stunning_Ad_2936 Jun 15 '25

Don't you have a middle finger?

1

u/Cardsforus1 Jun 15 '25

My Thermo prof said if we keep using chat gpt, we will be replaced by AI

1

u/OkMuffin8303 Jun 15 '25

People think everything they don't understand will get replaced with AI (which they also don't understand)

1

u/foco177 Jun 15 '25

I think the only response is nobody knows the future and manufacturing is too complicated to predict what will happen. It’s also to early in AI to determine what it’s actually capable of.

1

u/nadthevlad Jun 15 '25

AI is not going to take your job. It might help be more productive.
https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/sam-altman-ai-will-make-coders-10x-more-productive-not-replace-them

https://futurism.com/apple-damning-paper-ai-reasoning

The important thing here is to control your reaction and not lets others knock you off balance.

1

u/hataki7 Jun 15 '25

at my uni recently Venkat Venkatasubramanian (Columbia university prof) was invited to speak about this, as a chemE and also an expert at the topic. you might want to hear what his opinion is on this, it's surely interesting. that might actually give you insight (and also depress you a bit, sorry)

1

u/Gallagr1 Jun 15 '25

AI and other machine learning might replace some engineering tasks ( which by default will reduce the required number of engineers required). However, AI can not at this time walk a plant floor and listen to the pumps, feel the vibrations, and account for true real world conditions that do not match the theoretical. Those tasks still require skilled engineers especially in areas such as ChemE and FireProtection Eng where mistakes can cost lives and environmental disasters.

1

u/collonius10 Jun 15 '25

You'd better start using the AI before somebody with out a chemE degree does or they'll be right!

1

u/Difficult_Ferret2838 Jun 15 '25

I'd be a little more worried if half the industry wasn't ran by custom excel files with no descriptions.

1

u/Interesting-Sky-7014 Jun 15 '25

😂😂no it won’t. Genuinely impossible to replace I think. AI won’t be anything but a helpful tool to speed up some of the initial work or formatting some text for a report quickly but it cannot do the work

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '25

Some things will be eased by AI…but chemical engineering is very tied to low-level chemistry and physics. AI can be used to speed up simulations and many things, but a vast majority of things still need humans.

And even if I’m wrong, engineers always readapt based on new technologies…

1

u/NUSWannabeSWE Jun 16 '25

Process analyst yes

1

u/NefariousnessSad2283 Jun 16 '25

I would get back at them and say 'you know relatives will get replaced by AI too right? For once we would have relatives that are genuinely supportive'

1

u/naastiknibba95 Petroleum Refinery/9 years/B.Tech ChE 2016 Jun 16 '25

stop giving a shit about anything a relative or a stranger says.

1

u/Lotus_buds Jun 16 '25

Human intervention is needed at any point, AI can't do all the chemical engineering stuff alone...Even if it does in future say , you and I both won't be alive to witness that so you are safe to pursue it and tell them the same 😉 

1

u/bkidcudder Jun 16 '25

It holds no value. At the end of the day, AI cannot replace entire systems. If they could, we would’ve lost the war a long time ago

1

u/Maioranaa Jun 16 '25

How good is an AI talking to an operator at 4 AM about some batch that's way off?

1

u/chillimonty Jun 16 '25

It’s a spectrum. Some are easy to replace by AI. Some are hard. Chem Engineer is probably in the hardest 30% of jobs to replace. And when that day comes all jobs will likely be replaced by AI with a year or two.

1

u/saturnopia_ Jun 16 '25

AI can’t sign off on QA or safety checks so no… it’s a golden signature

1

u/rhl Jun 17 '25

Who’s going to use an AI to make molecules, if not a ChemE? If anything there will be more demand for chemical engineers, especially if you know how to train AI models for materials and molecules! Don’t be offended, be encouraged - sign up for CS and ML classes as part of your electives, there’s a vibrant community of chemical engineers training AI models for molecules and you can learn all of it easily with your ChemE calculus and linear algebra skills! After all, AlphaFold got the Nobel Prize for Chemistry!

1

u/Far_One_360 Jun 18 '25

Everyone and everything is getting AIed ... That's just the new thing.. like how everything got computerized and everything got automated

1

u/spideyamino Student (Diploma) Jun 26 '25

in my opinion i honestly HOPE and doubt this doesnt happen because theres just things that humans can do that AI cant that are important not only in chem eng but in so many industries.

and also as an Asian myself (not that it matters) i dont get how they could compare engineering to nursing like both are equally useful and important jobs ever since they existed

1

u/crashddr Jul 02 '25

I had an AI belabor the point several times and even cited references that supposedly show nitrogen having much lower vapor pressure than CO2... it was really stuck on this even when it acknowledged the data I told it.

LLMs aren't going to replace our jobs, but they might help with things like patent searches or having something to bounce ideas off of. Machine learning can also prove to be super useful and has been for many years. Got a trillion different molecular or crystalline structures to dig through? Having a machine sift through the mountain of data alongside a person could certainly speed up the process.

Don't worry about AI preventing you from finding work. Focus on getting all the experience you can right now through internships or co-ops. I interned over summers and winter breaks and started at ~$90k immediately out of school a decade ago.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 04 '25

Yeah it’s easy for them to say shit like that when they have a narrow perspective and don’t have a grasp on what the market or job is like.

1

u/Ok-Bandicoot-2465 Jul 12 '25

I am pretty sure it is hard for AI to replace us . I keep getting stupid answers to questions I ask AI for my chemical engineering queries . I am pretty sure it will take more than a text based language model for replacing us. and more importantly with the type of industrial accidents we have in our industry( god forbid any more to happen) I dont suppose anybody will be foolish enough to employ AI for that matter unless tested .

1

u/KobeGoBoom Jun 15 '25
  1. You should not be offended by someone thinking your job could be replaced by AI. It’s arrogant to suggest that it never could.

  2. Generalize much? There are plenty of Asians who won’t tell you to pursue something “useful.”Just like there are plenty of non-Asians who will tell you to pursue something “useful”.

1

u/Ok-Librarian1015 Jun 15 '25

If you’re offended by someone stupid saying something you’re also stupid

0

u/1PrestigeWorldwide11 Jun 15 '25

Engineers are on top 10 list last to be automated.  Nurses can’t be AI hmm let’s see a speaker camera and mic in every patients room connected to an LLM chatbot that knows what med doses etc all patience are supposed to get and can alert a doctor if anything is needed (and pretty much tell the doctor what to do anyway). They will need like one nurse for every 5 currently. There any job can be dreamed up an AI disruption. AI diagnoses better than doctors already.  ChemEs mix ups could blow up a town. They will have us checking AIs work for a long time yet.    P.S. have they not heard of humanoid robots? They already want them as nurses and healthcare aides.  If we get to the point AI replaces Chem engineers we will be post scarcity anyway. It will be up to society to distribute the riches and luxury fairly for all to live well in our Utopian future.