I'm talking less from a debate standpoint and moreso just how weird it is. I get that Goku loses even with it and they wanted to have some equivalent to Superman being a canon composite, but I don't think those are reasons enough when it's still explicitly a non-canon version of Goku. I know it wasn't intended this way but it comes across more as a pity inclusion for Goku rather than something that was actually considered from the start. I think if they wanted to include it, it should've just been a black box or two in the conclusion.
I also think the transition into it in the analysis is super jarring. Plus, the only thing they say about it is what feats Goku gets from it, nothing about the story of the game or how each of the feats they brought up came about. I'd say it's the only part of Goku vs Superman 3 I dislike.
12
u/Fezzih My matchup isn't popular enough for its own flair 27d ago
Lukewarm takes, can you explain the Goku one?
He loses anyway.