Looks like sending the National Guard along with federal law enforcement into Washington, D.C. to "fight crime", Trump thought US troops would blindly obey his orders if there are military-civilian confrontations.
When a sitting commander in chief authorizes acts like these (for the first time ever), which many assert are clear violations of the law, men and women in uniform face an ethical dilemma: How should they respond to an order they believe is illegal? Fighting and attacking our own people, civilians, is not what the military of our country was designed to do, at all but.
While troops are conditioned to obey orders, many service members do understand the distinction between legal and illegal orders, the duty to disobey certain orders, and when they should disobey orders.
US service members take an oath to uphold the Constitution. In addition, under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the US Manual for Courts-Martial, service members must obey lawful orders and disobey unlawful orders. Unlawful orders are those that clearly violate the Constitution, international human rights standards or the Geneva Conventions.
The majority of service members know that targeting non-combatants, isn't just illegal, it's immoral. As military personnel, they have a duty to uphold the law and refuse commands that betray that duty. They're ready to disobey.
Thoughts?