r/HadToHurt Nov 05 '17

Drunk fan slaps a cop

https://i.imgur.com/JU4v0XV.gifv
21.0k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

216

u/UnlimitedOsprey Nov 05 '17

Bullshit. If you don't want to be hit, don't strike first. Bitch is an idiot and that's a fair response by the cop.

471

u/panicky_in_the_uk Nov 05 '17

It might have been a fair response by your average man or woman in the street but a police officer is supposed to be more professional.

You start condoning police officers for lashing out because someone's made them angry then where does it end? Before you know it you'll have them shooting people for dubious reasons.

Oh, hang on...

50

u/AeonTek Nov 05 '17

Making an officer "angry" and physically assaulting an officer are two vastly different things.

171

u/panicky_in_the_uk Nov 05 '17

How would you feel if he'd taken his gun out and shot her? Or cracked her head open with his baton? Or knocked her teeth out and broken her jaw with that punch?

Which level of violent response are you willing to accept?

60

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17 edited Nov 05 '17

[deleted]

25

u/__FilthyFingers__ Nov 05 '17

Holy shit you really think this cop is such a tea leaf that this drunk girl could have possibly injured him? It was obviously a retaliation strike that was unnecessary.

31

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

While I mostly agree with your sentiment I don't think striking her did anything to protect him.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

while i agree with your statements, knocking her out cold did protect him lmao. no more slaps for a little while.

1

u/keygreen15 Nov 05 '17

So hilarious.

2

u/as1126 Nov 05 '17

It most certainly did do something. She is no longer capable of raising her hands to strike again. Not that I necessarily agree, but he is protected.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

Bet she won’t or didn’t hit him again. So yes it worked

1

u/jman12234 Nov 05 '17

I think his point was that the girl could not have possibly injured the police officer. She could barely slap him. He was not in danger. Grab her fucking arm for christssakes.

3

u/ArmoredFan Nov 05 '17

He could've taken a sharp nail to the eye, if she could reach his head she could eye gouge him.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

My point is she did. And he’s allowed to match the force and subdue the suspect. Which he did. With non lethal force. Doesn’t matter if she could’ve hurt him or not. He could’ve tazed her ass too. That would’ve been fine. He stopped the situation cold.

27

u/idledrone6633 Nov 05 '17

I just don't think she hit him that hard. Hell, she missed the slap and came back around with her hand and that's what smacked his face. Geez, put her down and cuff her.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17 edited Nov 05 '17

[deleted]

6

u/Profition Nov 05 '17

These comments make me understand why we get the policing we deserve.

2

u/Uphoria Nov 05 '17 edited Nov 05 '17

So your answer is it was too difficult for two police officers to restrain a 5-foot tall woman with handcuffs because she was drunk and surrounded by seated people in a crowd, so since it was too difficult they're allowed to just swing wildly hoping that the connect with only her in said crowd?

You understand your justifications for their use of force are the same reasons why they shouldn't have used them? What if this now not restrained and angry escalated women we just got punched in the face,and her boyfriend who might respond to this violence, react violently In This Crowd to these two police officers? Now she's donkey kicking heads because she's trying to get out cuz she just got punched sound so much better.

The problem is your assumption that policing works like TV violence where a single Punch To The Head knock somebody out for an extended period of time and they just give up. That punch to the face likely just made her very angry and temporarily stunned. She could have immediately gone back to flailing after the video cut out and because the officers didn't respond by Descalation and restraint, they've have done nothing to prevent it.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

[deleted]

3

u/Uphoria Nov 05 '17

Why would I give you a method of restraint other than the international standard for restraining someone?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

Edit: I spelled “did” wrong.

Psst. You spelled "gouge" wrong, too. ;)

2

u/PrinceAlbert85 Nov 05 '17

She could have got him right in the eyeball, those things are squishy as hell. One fingernail and he's blind in one eye forever.

2

u/WhoisTylerDurden Nov 05 '17

...falls within the policies...

I read that as “police-ies.” I pictured tiny little LEGO police in a toy car. Haha, I’m sorry, it’s early.

4

u/PrinceAlbert85 Nov 05 '17

I completely agree. She may have been drunk but that's her fault. She was assaulting that officer and he had a right to self defense just as any other person in that stadium. Cop or no. He didn't attack her and shove a plunger handle up her ass and beat her with a baton. Bottom line... Don't hit people.

0

u/Skyphe Nov 05 '17

I agree with you. I hate when people say "wELl iF He sHoT heR wOUld tHaT be OKaY?"

No, of course that wouldn't be okay. But he didn't shoot her or break her jaw.

1

u/yousmelllikearainbow Nov 05 '17

Do you fantasize about punching all the women you creep on over at /r/gonewild?

2

u/Skyphe Nov 05 '17

O.o no? Where'd you get that idea. Plus my comments are pretty tame on gone wild.

3

u/AeonTek Nov 05 '17

She hit him, he hit her. You're drastically overblowing things. Especially with police using their guns, there is clearly defined protocol as to when it's appropriate to use that kind of force. If those protocols aren't followed, I'm against it. There has to be a level of personal responsibility however. Both of them are in the wrong, but I don't feel bad for her.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

You just changed the argument to make this something it wasn't and said "well how about that?!"

Cops are allowed to defend themselves with appropriate force when assaulted. This was appropriate force, what you're dreaming up wouldn't be.

6

u/panicky_in_the_uk Nov 05 '17

No I'm just trying to see what level of force people are willing to accept.

You may call it 'appropiate' but I don't. He could have quite easily grabbed her arm but he didn't because he wanted to hit her for hitting him. That's not 'apropiate force', that's lashing out or dishing out your own brand of justice. It's unprofessional. It's a slippery slope.

You let little instances of excessive force go and where does that lead? Before you know it you'll have the police shooting people without just cause. And we wouldn't want that to happen, would we...?

-1

u/fingermebarney Nov 05 '17

Weapon deserves a weapon response.

If this had happened while she was standing she probably would have been tazed.

Welcome to America.