r/HadToHurt Nov 05 '17

Drunk fan slaps a cop

https://i.imgur.com/JU4v0XV.gifv
21.0k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

33

u/Foot-Note Nov 05 '17

Clearly she is a threat considering she just slapped him in the face. You think it wouldn't be easy for her to purposefully or accidentally hook his eye when she was slapping him?

34

u/Metro42014 Nov 05 '17

Ok, how about "clear and present" danger, rather than "threat"?

Why are you ok with cops punching people in retaliation for a scratch? I just can't see the sense of it.

17

u/EricFromWV Nov 05 '17 edited Nov 05 '17

Why are you okay with someone assaulting a police officer? The above comment was correct - it's all too easy for a "scratch" as you say to hit an eye and cause serious damage. The officer was reasonable to prevent that from happening again.There's no way this should be considered police brutality.

Edit- The police are at fault here too for not restraining her properly in the first place.

26

u/doctorfunkerton Nov 05 '17

Is LITERALLY ANYONE in this thread saying that the woman is in the right?

You're just pulling a bullshit straw man out of your ass.

The point a lot of people are making is that it is an excessive and unnecessary response by the cop

4

u/stuffandmorestuff Nov 05 '17

This is always the response from these people though.

It's an entirely black and white world. "Break any law, death penalty". Every argument is like this.

"Yeah, she was wrong. But do we really need to go that far?" "IF SHE DIDNT WANT TO GET BEATEN HALF TO DEATH SHE SHOULD HAVE WAITED TILL THE LITTLE MAN SAID TO WALK! JAY WALKING IS A CRIME IS THAT SO HARD IDIOT!!"

4

u/EricFromWV Nov 05 '17

I'm saying it wasn't unnecessary. What she did could have seriously injured him. The ideal thing to do would be to put her down and handcuff her properly, but I don't fault the officer for reaching the way he did. It seems to me that if this wasn't a woman, nobody in this thread would be rushing to call this brutality.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

What if she had a gun? Do you know she doesn't have one? Does the cop? Did they search her before carrying her off? How do they know? How do you know? We can play what-if all day and justify a taze-on-sight policy. Any action could seriously injur the cops. One of the cops could have fell down while carrying her and hit his head on concrete and died.

Risk-assessment is a complex subject and takes lots of work to do correctly. It's not something that can usually be done by the average person in a split second. Besides, we know how the cop felt about his safety by watching the video. If he feared for his well-being he would have put her down and handcuffed her after she hit him. Instead he hit her and then kept going. It was a knee-jerk reaction on his part. Not some careful consideration of risk that he learned from years on duty.

3

u/EricFromWV Nov 05 '17

I'm saying that the specific action she did was agressive and would reasonably injure a person. I don't like seeing people be punched in the face by police, but I do not fault the officer for reacting the way he did in this case I do fault them for not restraining her in the first place, though.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 05 '17

Fair enough

6

u/doctorfunkerton Nov 05 '17

So now your argument is a hypothetical "if it wasn't a woman..." stance...brilliant

4

u/EricFromWV Nov 05 '17

Did you miss the part where I said the action wasn't unnecessary? That's the more important bit.

2

u/Last5seconds Nov 05 '17

Maybe the cop has had a shitty day and at that point he needed to let his frustration out. Maybe he’s in the middle of a divorce and his kids are assholes? Maybe the cop is a human being and said to himself “did this bitch just hit me” and naturally tagged her back.

2

u/doctorfunkerton Nov 05 '17

Ok sure those are all very relevant imaginary scenarios /s but that doesn't justify it at all.

Both of these people were in the wrong, but it was clearly not an appropriate response by him given the situation or his position of power.