r/LosAngeles May 27 '25

Public Health Stanford scientists detect new COVID variant in California as U.S. moves to tighten vaccine access

https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/covid-variant-nb181-california-20346597.php?utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=copy-url-link&utm_campaign=article-share&hash=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc2ZjaHJvbmljbGUuY29tL2hlYWx0aC9hcnRpY2xlL2NvdmlkLXZhcmlhbnQtbmIxODEtY2FsaWZvcm5pYS0yMDM0NjU5Ny5waHA%3D&time=MTc0ODM2MTAxNjU2Mw%3D%3D&rid=ODRjYjdlN2ItOGM5OC00YjFmLWExNjQtZDQzZDczMWEzZDE1&sharecount=Mw%3D%3D

A new, highly transmissible variant of the coronavirus, known as NB.1.8.1, was detected in California and several other U.S. states, prompting concern among public health experts as the federal government moves to restrict access to updated COVID-19 vaccines.

First identified as a driving force behind a major surge in cases across China last month, the NB.1.8.1 variant has been reported in international travelers screened at airports in Washington, Virginia, New York and California. In California, scientists at the Stanford Clinical Virology Laboratory confirmed the state’s first known infection on April 17, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Experts said they were closely monitoring the variant, which is spreading rapidly across parts of Asia and Euorpe. In Hong Kong, health officials recently reported the highest levels of COVID-19 activity in at least a year, citing a “significant increase” in emergency room visits and hospitalizations.

“CDC is aware of reported cases of COVID-19 NB.1.8.1 in China and is in regular contact with international partners,” the agency said in a statement last week to CBS News, which first reported the variant’s detection in the U.S.

In addition to airport screenings, local health departments have confirmed NB.1.8.1 cases in Ohio, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Washington and California.

Experts say the variant appears to be more contagious than previous strains, though not more severe. Symptoms are similar to earlier strains, including cough, sore throat, fever and fatigue.

The emergence of NB.1.8.1 coincides with a controversial shift in vaccine policy under the Trump administration.

The Food and Drug Administration, now under leadership appointed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced last week that updated COVID-19 vaccines this fall will be limited to seniors and people with certain medical conditions.

“The FDA will approve vaccines for high-risk persons and, at the same time, demand robust, gold-standard data on persons at low risk,” said Dr. Vinay Prasad, the agency’s vaccine division chief and a professor of epidemiology at UCSF.

While officials say up to 200 million Americans will still qualify, many health experts warn the policy could leave large portions of the population unprotected.

During an FDA advisory panel meeting last week, outside vaccine experts discussed the implications of NB.1.8.1 and strategies for the upcoming vaccine rollout.

Last season’s shots targeted the KP.2 variant, a descendant of JN.1. Early data from Pfizer and Moderna suggest that a shift to another JN.1 offshoot — LP.8.1, currently dominant in the U.S. — may offer broader protection, including against NB.1.8.1.

A final decision on which strain to target in this fall’s vaccine is expected in the coming weeks.

In the meantime, public health officials continue to recommend basic preventative measures, including masking in crowded spaces and staying home when sick, as the country heads into its typical summer COVID-19 surge window.

1.0k Upvotes

113 comments sorted by

86

u/Automatic-Unit-8307 May 27 '25

How does vaccines work if only for seniors and people with health conditions? 200 millions people will qualify, so over 60 percent of USA population are seniors or in bad health enough to qualify for vaccines?

59

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 27 '25

Sooo... according to the FDA here is the list of people who can receive the vaccine.

Who will qualify for the COVID-19 vaccine?

Other than those over 65 years of age, the FDA specifically flagged these groups and conditions, among others not listed, as qualifying for the COVID-19 vaccine in the future:

Asthma
Cancer
Cerebrovascular disease
Chronic kidney disease
Chronic lung disease
Chronic liver disease
Cystic fibrosis
Diabetes (type 1 and type 2)
Gestational diabetes
Disabilities, including Down syndrome
Heart conditions
HIV
Mental health conditions
Dementia
Parkinson's disease
Obesity
Physical inactivity
Pregnancy and recent pregnancy
Primary immunodeficiency
Smoking, current and former
Solid organ or blood stem-cell transplantation
Tuberculosis
Use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications

The technicality here is if you have ever smoked (like a single cigarette while drunk at the bar, you were technically a smoker) or ever had an acute mental health episode, you can get the vaccine. It just depends, and this is the most important part, how insurance companies decided that they are going to cover the vaccine and what levels of PT/GP/insurer interactions are going to be required to ensure that someone who wants it, qualifies for coverage.

17

u/Automatic-Unit-8307 May 27 '25

Interesting, I wonder if they will require supporting documents since most adults have tried smoking at least once. Physically inactive or mental health issues? That would qualify pretty much most adults, but what do you need to proof you were physically inactive? Do you need a Certificate like Homer Simpson’s stating your crazy or not crazy or prescriptions for panic attacks qualify? What a mess

22

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 27 '25

The changes in the FDA guidelines are more impactful at the insurer level, because once it is off of the vaccine schedule, then obtaining the vaccine, depending on the policy, is no longer covered and can be charged for at cost. Thus, it becomes a nightmare where depending on the insurer/policy and their communications with GPs about the requirements associated with providing evidence of a condition to not pay out of pocket, not to mention, what the impact on a person's premiums could be for admitting to be a 'smoker' even if it is a technicality.

I fucking hate the world we live, but here we are, and these are the types of things we need to juggle while also trying to stay healthy/safe, both personally and communally.

3

u/Automatic-Unit-8307 May 27 '25

Exactly what I was thinking because I was going to claim former smoker to qualify since I did smoke 40 years old, but was afraid that might increase my insurance rate as a former smoker when I was 16 years old , 40 years ago

1

u/scarby2 May 29 '25

My bet is most insurers will continue to provide coverage for everyone. Most insurers covered the flu vaccine long before it was recommended for all adults.

7

u/shaka_sulu May 27 '25

IMO it's not worth declaring you were a smoker if you were not listed as a smoker. Not worth having that on you medical record.

4

u/_its_a_SWEATER_ You don’t know my address, do you know my address?? May 27 '25

Guess I’ll just say I’m a former smoker?

5

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 28 '25

Talk to your GP about what your options are given your insurance and if you even need an excuse because they will cover it without the excuse.

3

u/medicalmosquito May 28 '25

Seems like I’m about to come down with a bad case of physical inactivity 

2

u/amiibohunter2015 May 28 '25

Who will qualify for the COVID-19 vaccine?

Other than those over 65 years of age, the FDA specifically flagged these groups and conditions, among others not listed, as qualifying for the COVID-19 vaccine in the future:

Asthma Cancer Cerebrovascular disease Chronic kidney disease Chronic lung disease Chronic liver disease Cystic fibrosis Diabetes (type 1 and type 2) Gestational diabetes Disabilities, including Down syndrome Heart conditions HIV Mental health conditions Dementia Parkinson's disease Obesity Physical inactivity

Nope:

Pregnancy and recent pregnancy

Link here: https://www.yahoo.com/news/children-pregnant-women-no-longer-233025356.html

Primary immunodeficiency
Smoking, current and former
Solid organ or blood stem-cell transplantation
Tuberculosis
Use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications

They're cutting more.

0

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 28 '25

https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html

When they update the actual guidance, rather than just posting a video on Twitter, which actually impacts insurers payment for the vaccine, then yes. But the guidance still is in text, thus is something that insurers will still follow.

2

u/amiibohunter2015 May 28 '25

RFK Jr. Cut the vaccine for children and pregnant women.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rfk-jr-cuts-covid-vaccine-recommendation-healthy-kids/story?id=122233770

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-covid-vaccines-cdc-children-pregnant-women/

RFK Jr. Is the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

1

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 28 '25

Again, you keep linking to news articles which point to a Twitter video, I am point to the actual CDC website. Do you understand the difference and why that matters when it comes to actual policy? Just because something was announced does not mean that it is actually in effect and is in writing, which is the only thing that actually matters when it comes to insurers.

1

u/amiibohunter2015 May 28 '25

CDC has been politically manipulated in the past.

The Trump administration interfered with the CDC by pressuring officials to alter reports and align them with the president's public statements about COVID-19, which undermined the agency's scientific integrity. This manipulation included attempts to suppress information about the virus's severity and the effectiveness of certain treatments.

the Reagan administration is known to have influenced the CDC, particularly during the AIDS crisis, where political pressures affected the agency's ability to communicate vital health information. This manipulation marked a significant shift in the CDC's operations, leading to concerns about the politicization of public health.

They don't have creditability especially with this administration as Trump manipulated it in his first term.

The policies will change by RFK Jr.'s doing because Trump appointed him as secretary of health and human services.

1

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 28 '25

You seem to not understand what I am saying. As of right this moment, according to policy of the CDC, AS IT IS WRITTEN IN BLACK AND WHITE, it is still recommended that pregnant women get the Covid-19 vaccine which mean insurers will cover the vaccination. Until the CDC, likely because RFK Jr has no fucking clue what he is doing, and didn't co-ordinate the change of policy to be reflected in their written guidelines, which is what insurers go off of, thus it still stands as the CDC guidance. RFK Jr is a dipshit who announced a policy change without changing the actual policy.

Does that make sense?

1

u/amiibohunter2015 May 28 '25

Yeah it does to me , I agree that

RFK Jr has no fucking clue what he is doing,

,but Trump appointed RFK Jr. to the position of secretary of health and humans services.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services oversees the CDC and can influence its regulations, but the CDC itself develops and implements specific regulations through a formal rulemaking process. Ultimately, the Secretary has authority over broader health policies and programs, including those related to the CDC.

So as we speak it can be changing.

So,

As of right this moment,

Yes, but for example, tomorrow may be different.

That doesn't give people a lot of time, so I don't see why as of this moment is going to help. If the guy with authority overseeing regulations (RFK Jr.) intend a on cutting it for children and pregnant women.

It's about accepting what was said, I'm not saying go a long with it go ahead and protest, but don't live in some fantasy world of denialism to as a coping mechanism. Shutting down like that is not going to fix the problem, taking action and speaking out does more.

1

u/hfdjasbdsawidjds May 28 '25

Do you understand what the point of my post was? It was to ensure that a person has the ability to get the vaccine through using the means of available reasons for being able to get the vaccine covered. If one is pregnant, one can still get the vaccine by claiming mental health issues, as the policy is written in the moment. It is about understanding what the policies are in the moment and then being able to work with one's insurance to get the medical outcome that one desires even if the CDC is saying the opposite. That mainly comes down to working with your GP to understand both the CDC's guidelines and one's insurance in order to use both to get the medical outcome that is best for yourself and the community.

Its really that simple.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ostroga-mi May 28 '25

Gonna have to start going to the doc and telling him I can feel the ol' tuberculosis flarin' up the same way I had to go to the green doctor in Venice back in the day and complain about my glaucoma

1

u/NightOfTheLivingHam May 28 '25

so most of the US population?

1

u/suuuckerfish May 28 '25

What about healthy children? Ugh 😕

1

u/planetdaily420 Culver City May 28 '25

I am a master at being physically inactive. I’m for sure in to get one. Seriously though this is probably the only time I’ve been glad I am on immunosuppressants.

27

u/whitakr May 27 '25

Because our govt is filled with goons who don’t give a fuck about its people or facts

127

u/itzjuztm3 May 27 '25

I had COVID last week. First time for me. No idea if it was this variant though.

16

u/subredditcat May 27 '25

How was it for you?

23

u/friedricekid May 28 '25

he died.

11

u/DrZombehPiglet May 28 '25

I was there

13

u/GoldandBlue May 28 '25

Damn. This man is a doctor, he would know.

170

u/M0M0_DA_GANGSTA May 27 '25

"tighten vaccine access"

We cooked if that's how they're phrasing it 👀

10

u/arianrhodd Kindness is king, and love leads the way May 28 '25

They've also taken pregnant women off the list. Pregnant women suffered some of the most severe complications from COVID.

22

u/pb_barney79 May 27 '25

With Federal agencies like the CDC and Dept of Health being reduced, where can one get accurate information about outbreaks, etc.?

I see more people masking up but don't know if it's because of COVID or something else.

10

u/paintedfaceless May 27 '25

Local unis and public health authorities. Dunno if that’s being aggregated elsewhere.

5

u/deadprezrepresentme Highland Park May 28 '25

This lone fella has been the greatest resource I've been able to find since the start of the pandemic. He offers nothing but data and projection and attacks everything completely objective and without an agenda.

2

u/BagOdonutz May 28 '25

JWeiland is great, just also want to add Michael Hoerger, another population scientist who makes great resources: link I miss biobot’s public wastewater reports, but you can still get wastewater data from the CDC (for now).

1

u/LuvYerself May 29 '25

Except it looks like he hasn’t posted since Nov 2024…?

1

u/deadprezrepresentme Highland Park May 29 '25

Log in to Twitter. He just posted yesterday.

51

u/luv2ctheworld May 27 '25

The party of small government, religious freedom, and personal choice.

None of which they actually support.

47

u/minus2cats May 27 '25

Stanford scientists create new covid strain!! -GOP

22

u/this_knee May 27 '25

Ah nah, here we go again.

28

u/whoppacado May 27 '25

Now I can’t vote or get a Covid vaccine. Fun times.

1

u/epochwin May 29 '25

The California virus

9

u/statistically_viable May 28 '25

In 2028 charge rfk jr with manslaughter.

9

u/Celesteven May 28 '25

People in my household who dodged COVID for 5 years just came down with this.

6

u/imawreck0 May 28 '25

Same here!

3

u/simpwarcommander May 28 '25

these patch notes are wild.

5

u/Hatrct May 28 '25 edited May 28 '25

The last variant that caused a non-endemic wave (outside of flu season) was JN1 in summer 2024... if there was no new non-endemic variant/wave by fall/winter 2025/2026, one would have hoped that this virus finally turned endemic. But now this new variant threatens that. But let's wait and see: places like China opened up late during the pandemic so there may be some differences in immunity, we have to wait and see if this variant causes a wave in places like the US.

Also, since less than 0.000000000001% of people know about this: there is already a safe and effective vaccine that may be able to prevent infection. It is the codagenix vaccine. It is a live-attenuated virus vaccine that is administered through the nose, which means that it is a highly weakened version of the whole virus, and it has technology that prevents the spike protein from replicating in your body after you are exposed to the already extremely tiny viral load after this vaccine. The reason it is expected to protect against infection is because A) it is administered intranasally, which is where the virus enters B) it is the entire virus, not just the spike protein: each variant has its mutations mainly on the spike protein, that is why new variants continue to cause waves of infection despite vaccination, because the mRNA vaccines are solely based on the old spike protein of old variants so the new variants can evade this due to new mutations on their spike protein, and also because they are not intranasal. The first clinical trial for the live attentuated vaccine was done as early as 2021, which showed it was safe and effective in about 30 people. The phase 3/final clinical trial was done by the WHO and concluded in late 2024, but so far there is 0 word on the internet about the results.

Also, the US, despite fast tracking the mRNA vaccines by big corporations moderna/pfizer including their boosters, not only is rejecting to accept the WHO's clinical trial on this vaccine, but is strangely requiring an additional phase "2b" domestic trial before even doing a domestic phase 3 trial. And of course, not only has the phase 2b trial not started yet (we are in 2025 people), but even FUNDING for phase 2b trial has not even been secured yet, even by the biden administration, let alone the Trump administration. This vaccine could very well be the solution and if offered annually can prevent infection and long covid for millions, but due to brilliant government minds, and the public, of which 0.0000000001% know or care about this, it is just sitting somewhere in a laboratory while people more and more people continue to get infected and get long covid unnecessarily. The brilliant government minds believe that unleashing such a vaccine would be dangerous, despite clinical trials showing it is safe and effective on many people already, and requires 1000 additional years of clinical trials, and according to their calculations, it is more beneficial to wait 1000 more years and give long covid to millions of more people instead. And 0.0000000001% of the public even know about this let alone are talking about it. This goes against common sense. This vaccine is basically the virus at a very low viral load + technology that prevents the problematic spike protein from replicating in your body. People are ALREADY getting infected with ACTUAL covid OVER and OVER again. RELEASE this vaccine already: it is BETTER than covid infection which is ALREADY happening. But the big brilliant government minds want to restrict your decision to do this and force covid on your instead for another 1000 years of clinical trials that they 12 years just to approve funding for each additional stage of the clinical trials, while people are getting covid in the meantime. 1+1=3 everyone repeat after me.

17

u/Spirited-Humor-554 May 27 '25

There is always a new variance. Seems like there is a new one every 6 months or so.

42

u/Basboy May 27 '25

Same as flu. That's why we get vaxxed. Fun times ahead for us.

7

u/Chalupaca_Bruh May 27 '25

Would be hilarious if the people looking to restrict vaccine access got Herman Cain’d. 

2

u/lmgforwork May 29 '25

It’s frustrating to hear that Stanford scientists have already found the NB.1.8.1 variant circulating in California just as federal policy moves toward limiting who can get updated vaccines.San Francisco Chronicle Pulling back access when a more contagious strain is gaining ground feels like taking away umbrellas right before a storm.

A few steps can soften the blow while officials sort out the next vaccine plan:

  • Layer protection now. High-filtration masks in crowded indoor spaces and good ventilation at home still cut down exposure risk.
  • Stay alert by testing quickly. Keeping a couple of reliable antigen kits on hand lets anyone check new symptoms within minutes and decide sooner about isolating or calling a doctor.
  • Document symptoms and results. A simple log of test dates, any fevers, and how long symptoms last helps a clinician see patterns if care is needed later.
  • Watch local wastewater or hospital dashboards. Regional data often spikes before headline numbers do, giving an early signal to tighten precautions.

None of this replaces broad vaccine access, but it buys time and peace of mind until clearer guidance— and hopefully wider eligibility— arrives.

2

u/l00kAtTheRecluse May 30 '25

Do the at home test kits detect this one? I feel like doodoo.

6

u/sucobe Woodland Hills May 27 '25

Ugh. Covid. What is you doing.

5

u/fadingsignal May 28 '25

Well, we let it rip, and this is how it goes.

3

u/NightOfTheLivingHam May 28 '25

they are literally trying to kill us.

3

u/willfrodo May 27 '25

Oh how fun...

2

u/RockieK May 27 '25

Yup. It's popped up in my town!

2

u/Similar-Low-3114 May 27 '25

I can’t wait for trump to really mess this next one up

12

u/chil943 May 27 '25

He already is messing it up "The FDA will approve vaccines for high-risk persons and, at the same time, demand robust, gold-standard data on persons at low risk,” means you can't get vaxxed even if you want to unless you are elderly or "high risk"

2

u/Automatic-Unit-8307 May 27 '25

So for COVID vaccines, senior is 65, but for other vaccines, mostly start at age 50 and senior discount for Dennys grand slam breakfast starts before 65

-13

u/AbsolutesDealer May 27 '25

“Experts say the variant appears to be more contagious than previous strains, though not more severe. Symptoms are similar to earlier strains, including cough, sore throat, fever and fatigue.”

Ohhhh nooooooooo!

-30

u/[deleted] May 27 '25

Barbara Ferrer about to invoke a mask mandate tomorrow .

14

u/Spirited-Humor-554 May 27 '25

Highly unlikely. Most of the public would ignore it and there is no way business would try to enforce it.

18

u/coastally1337 May 27 '25

given how hard we're getting hammered by pollen this spring, i've been kn95'ing

9

u/TeslasAndComicbooks The San Fernando Valley May 27 '25

Yeah I’ve been sneezing up a storm. Had like 7 in a row the other day.

-22

u/__-__-_-__ May 27 '25

I think that will be the death of the Democrats in 2026/2028.

15

u/coastally1337 May 27 '25

it's either that or the death of more Americans once Trump's WH eliminates access to boosters for the general public--which then gets blamed on Democrats anyway

3

u/__-__-_-__ May 27 '25

Look, I’ve gotten every booster available. I just don’t think people care as much as reddit thinks. People don’t want to be told what to do.

1

u/Inevitable-Cell-1227 May 27 '25

This is correct.

-77

u/ceviche-hot-pockets Pasadena May 27 '25

Are people still scared of Covid? Time to move on.

44

u/soldforaspaceship The San Fernando Valley May 27 '25

I mean, that reads as really dismissive of those who lost loved ones to the virus.

Just a thought.

-41

u/ceviche-hot-pockets Pasadena May 27 '25

I mean I was plenty scared of it in 2020, 2021 and a bit in 2022. I got it in 2022 and it was nothing. At some point it’s just another virus which we should avoid but not fear.

29

u/YetiBot May 27 '25

What about this article frightened you? You say it’s fine to try to avoid catching covid, which is exactly what we want to do by getting a vaccine or wearing a mask. 

I don’t understand your leap from seeing basic logical preventative measures and calling them “scared”. 

I’m extremely unlikely to die of Covid. Still sounds unpleasant and I’d rather avoid it. I wear a seatbelt in the car and lock my door at night too. Am I a pathetic fearful sheep?

21

u/ZeeBalls May 27 '25

Oh thank god! You got it and you’re ok, right? The rest of the planet and the families of the 7 million people that it killed, that was their #1 concern. Long as ceviche-hot-pockets says we should just not fear it, we good!

-25

u/ceviche-hot-pockets Pasadena May 27 '25

Notice how nobody outside Reddid cares about Covid anymore? It ain’t just me, pal.

12

u/ZeeBalls May 27 '25

The cult of maga is giddy with a fat rapist that’s telling them climate change is a hoax. Science, statistics and facts don’t really give a flying fuck what the dumbest half of America thinks about it.

17

u/garifunu May 27 '25

I noticed how you didn’t acknowledge all the people who died

Congratulations on being young and healthy, two very simple things you will take for granted.

Now what about babies, grandparents, and the immunocompromised. Is it time for them to move on too and to stop being “scared” of it? I mean sure yeah once they get the vaccine :)

-26

u/[deleted] May 27 '25

[deleted]

19

u/soldforaspaceship The San Fernando Valley May 27 '25 edited May 27 '25

You certainly seem like the type to fear a little prick.

Edit: in case that's not clear. I despise liars. Especially those who invent deaths for online points.

There are roughly 30-40 deaths in the US that medical review believes could be directly caused by the vaccine. So for you to know 2 of them is statistically impossible.

17

u/Earth_Inferno May 27 '25

And on top of that they themselves have "serious long term side effects from the vaccine" along with a bunch of people they know? If you're going to lie, at least make it something statistically possible.....

11

u/soldforaspaceship The San Fernando Valley May 27 '25

Seriously. People like that caused covid deaths with their lies.

I will not give them a pass.

13

u/Into-Imagination May 27 '25 edited May 27 '25

Are people still scared of Covid? Time to move on.

Me personally? Nah.

For my partner who has other health challenges, and an infection would cause risks/issues? Heck yeah.

All I want is the ability for my partner and me to get the damn vaccine, same as we could last year. I don’t give a crap what you do or do not vaccinate for, that’s between you and whatever medical advisor you use.

Yet people like you trotting out the “oh are you still afraid boo hoo” baloney is getting in the way of that: all of a sudden I’m no longer afforded the freedom to make that choice because of attitudes like yours.

So with the entire amount of respect due to you: may you step in puddles and have wet socks.

-19

u/[deleted] May 27 '25

Reddit is.

-1

u/yaxis50 May 27 '25

Sounds an awful lot like the flu shot playbook.

-63

u/-Livingonmyown- Valley Glen May 27 '25

Oh no, anyways.......

8

u/Nikopoleous May 27 '25

Somehow I'm always surprised at how selfish people can be

3

u/stonersteve1989 May 28 '25

How can you still be surprised? How many fucking selfish idiots voted for trump? This country is now visibly built on shit, run like shit, and is setting us up for a shit future. Basically the only thing that’s gonna save America is a pandemic bad enough it’ll kill off all the anti mask, anti science people

2

u/Nikopoleous May 28 '25

Dude, chill.

5

u/stonersteve1989 May 28 '25

No dude, be alarmed. The attempted fascist takeover of government is underway. If there ever was a time to be angry and upset it’s now.

0

u/Nikopoleous May 28 '25

How about this, why don't you be alarmed for us both. Sound good?

-6

u/[deleted] May 28 '25

[deleted]

4

u/Nikopoleous May 28 '25

Ah, unverifiable claims. Always a joy.

-4

u/[deleted] May 28 '25

[deleted]

3

u/Nikopoleous May 28 '25

Let me guess, you're the reason we needed to in the first place

0

u/[deleted] May 28 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Nikopoleous May 28 '25

let me guess you want lock downs again

I'm introverted, being at home away from sick people isn't exactly the punishment you think it is.

This has been lovely and all, but are you getting to your point sometime soon?

0

u/[deleted] May 28 '25

[deleted]

4

u/Nikopoleous May 28 '25

Libertarians are so funny. Unlike being pregnant, spewing YOUR germs in a public space affects MY well-being.

My body has just as much of a right to exist as yours does. Unless you'd prefer it if I came over to where you lived and sneezed all over you whenever I got sick.

Tell me your address, sovereign citizen. I'll drop by the next time I have the flu.

→ More replies (0)

-23

u/[deleted] May 27 '25

It’s only a problem if the government decides to enact overreaching control again

-61

u/thetaFAANG May 27 '25

yawn, or should I say cough

-2

u/Lopsided-Berry7728 May 28 '25

lol. get your boosters and mask up now. your being told to be terrified, so act accordingly.

1

u/sierrackh May 30 '25

Captain fucking gravel voice and the new “I woulda been an ENT but I woulda beat up the drill instructor” General are on it I am sure 🙄