r/Mushrooms 4d ago

Look what I found in my yard

Any guesses?

395 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 4d ago

ϵ϶ Read the rules ϵ϶ Tips for posting ID requests ϵ϶ Mycology resources ϵ϶ Have you tried the AI at iNaturalist yet?

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

54

u/I_like_Mashroms Trusted Identifier 4d ago

Leucocoprinus leucothites. Not an amanita.

8

u/Just-Nic-LeC 4d ago

That’s crazy cool you know that

10

u/-Blackfish 4d ago

Curious to how you give ID when no region specified? Not doubting. Just fascinated.

29

u/I_like_Mashroms Trusted Identifier 4d ago

It has a pretty global distribution and it's in season now.

We're gonna see a lot more soon.

11

u/jennr246 4d ago

Don't the slight ridge lines around the cap also rule out amanita ? I only see a little and I'm newer to id so just wondering.

19

u/I_like_Mashroms Trusted Identifier 4d ago

Yea, marginal striations help rule out Sect. Phalodieae.

15

u/RdCrestdBreegull Trusted Identifier 4d ago

I know was a typo, but spelling for those reading — sect. Phalloideae

8

u/RdCrestdBreegull Trusted Identifier 4d ago

some Amanita sections will have inherent cap margin striations with prime fresh specimens, while some will not — https://www.reddit.com/r/amanita/s/8MFY0zIJVg — although the ones that don’t can have striations after some environmental weathering :)

destroying angels (which are within section Phalloideae) do not have cap margin striations with fresh prime mature specimens but can have them once weathered

OP’s mushroom, Leucocoprinus leucothites, does not have cap margin striations with fresh prime specimens. the striations we’re seeing with OP’s mushroom are the result of age and weathering :)

3

u/PrscheWdow 3d ago

Off topic but I love that the first descriptor for Roanokenses is "messy" lol

Jokes aside, this is a great tool.

2

u/jennr246 3d ago

Thank you so much for the explanation!

I did not know that after age/weathering they may show the striations (destroying angel or OP's mushroom).

41

u/[deleted] 4d ago

Beautiful spore print

130

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/RdCrestdBreegull Trusted Identifier 4d ago

OP’s mushroom is edible

9

u/SoggyAd9450 4d ago

It's not a destroying angel or even an amanita or even toxic. Leocoagaricus leucothites, white dapperling. Nontoxic,

6

u/Ruby5000 4d ago

I forgot about that! It was beef Wellington;)

6

u/[deleted] 4d ago

😅

5

u/Lavasioux 4d ago

"Ze Babayaga!"

0

u/Billyg88 4d ago

“Yeah, I’m thinking I’m cap”

0

u/waitwheresmychalupa 4d ago

This one needs a little ranch

20

u/warneagle 4d ago

Leucoagaricus leucothites. It’s not a destroying angel, if that’s what you thought it was.

4

u/Bawbag420 4d ago

Im not disagreeing with you but what are how can you tell?

17

u/warneagle 4d ago

Lack of a saccate volva at the base is the biggest giveaway.

10

u/Bawbag420 4d ago

After a quick Google i can see it now thanks

4

u/RdCrestdBreegull Trusted Identifier 4d ago

cap texture, annulus appearance, lack of volva / volval limbs :)

7

u/Expensive-Letter-691 4d ago

Previously Leucoagaricus leucothites now Leucocoprinus leucothites

6

u/RdCrestdBreegull Trusted Identifier 4d ago

Leucocoprinus leucothites (Leucoagaricus leucothites s.l.), edible

0

u/Mission_Hawk4662 4d ago

That is a no-eaty

7

u/RdCrestdBreegull Trusted Identifier 4d ago

it’s edible :)

1

u/Gullible_Pin5844 3d ago

It looks like amanita.

1

u/1993Haley1993 3d ago

Peppermint Lifesaver?

-4

u/Affectionate-Fox1133 4d ago

White mushrooms with white spore print is a sign of very dangerous amanitas and I wouldn’t ever eat this even if someone thought it was something else it’s to dangerous destroying angles are all white and have a white spore print and I’m almost certain that’s an amanita

5

u/Eiroth Trusted Identifier 3d ago

Harmless Leucocoprinus!

-8

u/MrUniverse1990 4d ago edited 4d ago

That looks like a Destroying Angel, one of the most toxic mushrooms on the planet.

Edit to clarify: I am in no way asserting that this is a destroying angel, I'm simply stating that I think it looks like one. I could be wrong.

5

u/SoggyAd9450 4d ago

Looks like superficially, in fact is not

3

u/BiIIiamCIinton 4d ago

Looks can be deceiving MrUniverse1990

-8

u/420Bosco 4d ago

Wild most likely poisonous