Where are the homeless supposed to go?

[u/Garey_Coleman]

Cities have been cracking down on homeless people so they can’t have encampments or stay on sidewalks. At the same time usually the shelters are full. So those who are unable to get into a shelter, where are they supposed to go?

[u/melodicprophet]

I don’t see why you wouldn’t expose the ridiculous overhead in imprisoning a person who lacks a house when trying to emphasize this point. The cost of a homeless person (disease, emergency rooms, crime, rehabs, addiction, theft, etc.) being free to live on the street is estimated to being similar to putting them in jail.

While the costs of a solution may be difficult to project, we do have a good idea of how much it would cost to house the homeless. We have a good idea how much it costs taxpayers to neglect the problem. We have a strong understanding of why people are homeless. We know beyond housing subsidies, Medicaid, and SNAP how much the American government spends on so-called anti-poverty programs already - which in almost every case is more or less just handing out money.

There is no perfect solution, but neglect is well beyond cruel - it’s financially devastating.

[u/HeadsAllEmpty57 → u/melodicprophet]

I wouldn't emphasize or "expose" the various prison costs because they are all included in that 40k/year figure... housing, utilities, food, medical care, and social services are already included even though they are all subpar services. Also my point wasn't really that prison costs are worth it, are a good use of those resources, or that prison costs are cheaper than the housing option. My point is when comparing the two you can't ONLY look at the low cost rent for the housing option while simultaneously including all costs within the prison option.

I'm completely for a better solution than the current situation which is either tent cities rife with crime, drugs, and danger or prison. But if we are going to talk about those better options or better yet try to convince others that aren't sold on a better solution yet, then I believe we should also talk about the true costs(both monetary and labor wise) and not try to sell it with the exaggeration of "low-cost housing rent subsidized is substantially less than half of subsidized prison cost per person, therefore housing them is considerably cheaper than imprisoning them and all their problems go away magically" because the truth of the matter is that simply putting a roof over their heads will do nothing for an overwhelming majority of them.

[u/melodicprophet → u/HeadsAllEmpty57]

But this information is readily available. It’s not perfectly empirical, but I am not pulling it out of thin air. I am estimating to be succinct, but know the data. My points are rooted in that data.

The center for housing and urban development (HUD) estimated a one-time cost of $20b to end homelessness in 2021 when COVID made everyone realize how close we all are to losing everything. I don’t know if I fully accept that and would expect that there would be extensive annual cost In sustaining that. But regardless, $20b before even beginning to factor in all the benefits that will come from 99.9% of people having shelter from the elements is a shocking low bill. Elon Musk is worth over $400b himself. He individually could pay that bill and invest another $500m annually for the next 760yrs and as far as funding goes - the problem is solved. The logistics and politics are a very different matter. But financially speaking, this would not be an expensive undertaking for a superpower like the US to handle.

I cite median rent (just under $20k annually) because most people are struggling to hold their apartments. If you’re looking for a number, its all out there. An incarcerated person costs roughly $40k annually. A person on the street perhaps slightly less but wildly variable. Say $35k. To provide low-cost housing to an individual Estimates to be about $13k annually. That’s including support like SNAP and Medicaid. There are about 800,000 homeless people (rapidly rising with the recent adminstration.) Do I think this is the exact math of how everything will just perfectly work out? Of course not. But it is abundantly clear that this a very affordable problem to solve. I emphasize the cost because IME it is by far the most fundamentally misunderstood aspect of both the problem and potential solutions. Many people just assume it is completely infeasible.

To me it’s the most frustrating truth about life. The things a human being fundamentally need are very affordable and proven to be doable by a caring society: Food, Housing, Clean Water, and Health Care. Most people just want agency over their own lives and to be treated with dignity. But by making survival itself a commodity when such scarcity doesn’t exist is greatly holding our culture and people back.

In my view and time spent learning about homelessness and experiencing some of it: At absolute worst, the cost would be negligible. But from what we do know, a roof + SNAP + Medicaid is a chance at a real life and IMO believe it would the compound benefits of even cutting the homeless population in half would be impossible to calculate. That’s the kind of world I’d prefer to live in even if there was a tax increase. But it does not appear necessary as far as I can see.

[u/melodicprophet → u/HeadsAllEmpty57]

“Because the truth of the matter is simply putting a roof over their heads will do nothing for an overwhelming majority of them.”

I mean this right here says it all doesn’t it?

Cost is used as the go-to excuse. I just demonstrated that excuse is clearly not rooted in reality. Cost stands in place for “these people are just not worth it.”

I don’t assume that to be everyone’s belief, so I like to demonstrate the financial reality of the situation and it almost never proves to be worth it. There’s a reason domestic animals constantly seek shelter. They know what you know and what I know and what a homeless person knows - it’s nicer inside. It’s warmer. It’s safer. It allows for privacy. Where I live, you will literally die from the cold 8 months of the year if you have nowhere to go.

10% Veterans 40% Women 33% are literally children (this is the fastest growing group over the past two years)

Not that it should matter, but does that alter your perception? If 1/3 of them are children, you’re ready to write them off as irredeemable because their parents can’t pay the rent?

I grew up very well off. Dad is a frugal and self-centered bastard but the basics were never an issue. I am a grown man with a college degree. Homelessness was an absolute fucking nightmare. And I even at least had a car. If you don’t have the base of maslow’s hierearchy of needs, then virtually no positive outcomes are even possible. If you can lay that base and safety net, you’re giving people a chance. For most of us as passionate as I am about this, it’s about simple dignity. Did I make some mistakes? Definitely. But I didn’t do anything to warrant being disposed of like trash, either. If the only benefit to housing the homeless is that they are 10% more comfortable than they were before, it’s 100% worth it to me. I wouldn’t seek a return on it.

You saying it would make no difference is shockingly out of touch. It would change people’s entire worlds. And with each generation of slashing down that homeless number: educational and training opportunities grow, breaking away from dysfunctional and abusive families becomes possible, and our entire culture becomes richer because we can take pride in how we care for our most vulnerable people.