r/NonCredibleDefense Sex-Obsessed Beer Lover 9d ago

It Just Works Rods from God, and Cleaning up Surplus

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

View all comments

142

u/TheirCanadianBoi 9d ago edited 9d ago

I'm not sure if an Abrams could reenter in one piece. The space around the turret and gun would basically act like a plasma cutter.

Does anyone know what the terminal velocity of an Abrams would be? I would assume it would fall front down, but it might also tumble.

It would be fun to try.

74

u/Defult_idiot <-Visited an Italian Army base 9d ago

Assuming a drag coefficient of 1,8 (Cd of the Eiffel tower because there was no Cd for the Abrams), air density 0,683 kg/m3 which is the average of air density between sea level and 17 km (because using density from ISS orbit where air density is negligible gives you double digits mach numbers even with something as un-aerodynamic as an Eiffer tower), and a surface area of 2,44 m x 3,66 m= 8,93m2

SEPv3 Mass: 66.8 tonnes= 66800kg

For acceleration to be equal to zero weight=drag so Drag= 66800x9,81= 655308N.

Using drag's inverse formula V= sqrt((2x655308)/(0,683x8,93x1,8))= 345,513m/s= 1243,84km/h

This entire thing was calculated using highschool math, assumptions and without taking into account deceleration from much higher reentry velocities (so it's as if we dropped an abrams at 17km up in the air instead of orbit) so feel free to go "Uhm akshually ๐Ÿค“" if you get more accurate numbers

46

u/SpaceEngineX 9d ago

Turrets are only held in by gravity, drag would overpower it and eject it from the ring before the unique geometry would cause any weird heating hotspots.

56

u/SamtheCossack Luna Delenda Est 9d ago

That only applies to naval turrets on like battleships. Tank Turrets do have an attachment ring, they don't fall off when the tank flips.

... I mean it is still coming out on reentry though, it is just going to need to break some steel first.

10

u/leberwrust 9d ago

What you are saying is that we need a big drone that steals the turrets of your enemy right?

5

u/Meihem76 Intellectually subnormal 9d ago

IIRC there are 48 bolts holding on an Abrams turret. There's a video up on Youtube of some guys changing one out.

2

u/TheirCanadianBoi 9d ago

Great point.

6

u/Bubbly_Taro Plane Dropped Flechette 9d ago

They should be girthy enough to hit the enemy with a few tons of steel or molten slag.

19

u/TheirCanadianBoi 9d ago

You know, on top of every other problem with this. This would not be a precision weapon.

The only possible use I could think of is starting a forest fire in the most comically inefficient way possible.

8

u/hufenschwinger 9d ago

Have you tried using... more? Think of them as .00000714 gauge pellets.

11

u/TheirCanadianBoi 9d ago edited 4d ago

Ooo~ what if instead of Rods of God we had the Piรฑata of God?

A spinning mass of metal blocks with ceramic interlocking joints. Reenters and gains considerable thermal energy, then detonates and can spread hot slag over an area the size of Shanghai?

There could potentially be enough individual fires, that management of them will quickly become impossible.

If you hit it before detonation, good for you, you might be slightly less than optimally fucked.

2

u/Environmental_Sea72 Fruity Boeing Sentry ๐Ÿ’… 8d ago

You,

I like how you think

1

u/TheirCanadianBoi 8d ago

Canadian practicality?

1

u/Environmental_Sea72 Fruity Boeing Sentry ๐Ÿ’… 8d ago

perhaps

1

u/Dies2much 9d ago

Be thinking cement. Metal is too expensive