r/NonCredibleDefense • u/GenDouglasMacArthur Irradiated Belt of Cobalt • 5d ago
Arsenal of Democracy đ˝ 30 years ago today
1.1k
u/JesradSeraph 5d ago
Sooooooo⌠Operation Deliberate Force 2.0 against russia when ?
968
u/External-Option-544 Saabmissive & Sweadable 5d ago
If Russia didnât have nuclear weapons, it would have already happened. They donât stand a chance in a conventional conflict with NATO.
Unfortunately, Russia does have nukes. However, the West can still transfer the $245 billion in frozen Russian assets to Ukraine, allowing them to arm themselves to the teeth. This drip-feeding of support really needs to stop.
353
u/Sosemikreativ 5d ago
I assume doing that kind of stuff to international funding would escalate into corporate and banking mayhem. Half the world is made up of insanely rich dictatorships that equally like to prepare for some sort of regional war and invest their wealth in Western countries. Imagine what happens to the Western economies and banks when these nations realize their wealth will just be taken from them and given to the enemy once they start their pet project war of aggression. That's probably why it's just frozen.
235
u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago edited 4d ago
Maybe housing in London and elsewhere will finally be affordable when the properties owned by dictators' shell companies suddenly all get dumped onto the market.
A documentary on how London is a major center of money laundering, including Russian oligarchs, and how it's easy for the oligarchs to lawyer up in the UK to shut down investigative journalists. The Financial Times themselves said they have lost legal battles against individuals that they attempted to investigate, because those people probably have even deeper pockets than the FT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyk12Wf_TeQ
67
u/iwumbo2 Canadian nuke program when? 4d ago
Solve the western housing crisis and financially ruin dictatorships in one move? That's two birds with one stone, why aren't we doing this? Are we stupid?
34
6
u/kirillre4 4d ago
Governments don't have any housing problems and really love dictatorships' money, so that would be completely counterproductive to them.
2
92
u/Obvious-Ranger-2235 5d ago
That's part of the reason. Also a lot of Western companies have assets overseas. Any or all of which could be seized in immediate retaliation.
59
u/Sasquatch1729 4d ago
True, but many western companies have already had their assets stolen (for example, jets in Russia were commandeered during the early days of the war).
https://avweb.com/aviation-news/russia-seized-10-times-more-airliners-than-it-lost-to-sanctions/
Also many companies are selling their assets because they can't get any wealth out of them and they may as well sell before the Russians seize their stuff anyway.
They can use the funds as leverage to get the Russians to give back these assets, or use the fund to pay off Western companies' losses for investing in Russia.
I'd rather see the money go to Ukraine, but I have a feeling this is what they're saving it for.
42
u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago
Russia also stole Oneweb's satellites that were supposed to be launched with Russian rockets: https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/05/oneweb_takes_229m_hit_from/
3
u/TARANTULA_TIDDIES 4d ago
That shit has already happened in russia
3
u/gronlund2 4d ago
Yeah, it was a semi valid reason before Russia took airplanes and seized businesses, now the goal should be to rob them blind.
If there's even a skateboard in the west owned by a russian it should be seized and sent to Ukraine, I'm sure there's kids there who would enjoy it
13
u/x1rom 4d ago
Also it's a coercive item to end the war. If Russia gets the money back, it means that there's more incentive to end the war. If the assets are just gone, then Russia loses out either way, and it gets less likely for Russia to end the war early.
10
u/TARANTULA_TIDDIES 4d ago
If Russia gets that money back as part of a "peace" theyre just going to use that money to rebuild their military for another try within 5-10years
3
u/Cultural_Blueberry70 4d ago
They should only be able to use it as the first installment of their reparations to Ukraine.
1
u/hx87 14h ago
Most of those investments are in non-productive, rent-seeking sectors of the economy, like finance, insurance and real estate, not industry, technology or productive services. Cutting off those investments might actually help unfuck western economies.
Of course the governing classes in the West are also heavily invested in FIRE, which is probably why value added taxes are ubiquitous but land value taxes (the most efficient taxes possible) are nonexistent.
34
u/tukkerdude 4d ago
Amen im in the Netherlands and voted for a political party that supported ukraine full stop and will do so again next election. This is one of the very few cases ware further violence IS the solution!
20
u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago
War! Huh! What is it good for? Huh! Stopping Russiaâs baseless invasions!
3
u/tukkerdude 3d ago
By the MIGHT of OUR collective DEMOCRACY WE SHALL AID our ALLIES in the EAST!!! GLORY to UKRAINE!!! VICTORY is INEVITABLE!!!
20
u/Rambos_Magnum_Dong 4d ago
They barely stand a chance in a conventional conflict with Ukraine.
8
u/FocusBro2024 4d ago
Nah, clearly Russia could win any day, they just havenât been trying hard enough, if daddy Putin gives the go they could easily take it over in half a second /s
41
u/RarityNouveau 4d ago
I really want to believe that all the nukes that Russia has are actually just as run down and broken as the rest of their military.
36
u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago
Once Russia inevitably implodes post Putin, weâre gonna find out they have 3 or 4 functional nukes, and for some reason MS-13 or some Mexican Drug Cartel has like, 12 they accidentally bought ages ago
22
u/realif3 4d ago
I swear to God back when WikiLeaks was big I read about nukes in Mexico.
29
u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago
I mean, a Russian Admiral nearly sold the cartel a fully loaded and function nuclear submarine. The cartel was the one who backed out upon realizing that the missiles would be included, hilariously enough
29
u/AlliedMasterComp 4d ago
The cartel was the one who backed out upon realizing that the missiles would be included, hilariously enough
Becoming a strategic level threat to the US Military in the western hemisphere is generally an ill advised move.
7
u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago
Letâs be fair, with just one sub theyâd probably be an operational level threat. But yeah, I just find it hilarious to hear the cartels be the adults in the room yknow?
9
u/FocusBro2024 4d ago
âListen, I may chop guys head off and skin them alive, but I know Mr America up there will do the same to me if a buy this shitâ
6
u/ChosenUndead15 3d ago
As much of vicious bloodthirsty beast they are, they didn't get far without knowing they if they bite more than they could chew they would be death and worse because every direct opponent is also a vicious bloodthirsty beast.
6
u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 3d ago
I will say, the idea of them going through with it and then doing a comic villain âhold the US hostage until you legalize drugs/crimeâ thing would be funny as fuck
→ More replies (0)22
u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago
Something something not wanting to attract unwanted attention (e.g. a CIA's SAC/SOG team blackbagging the cartel leadership at night for extraordinary rendition, or outright assassinations) when they're already raking in billions of USD annually from their operations.
13
u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago
Oh thatâs definitely why, I just think itâs peak non credibility that a cartel is more credible at risk assessment over a Russian Admiral. IIRC he got caught because the fucking cartels ratted him out
1
u/Reddit_Adminh8 2d ago
Imagine the cartels just wind up with enriched uranium as a byproduct of starting their own nuclear power plants for meth superlabs and breaking into the AI datacenter game
8
u/OrdinaryLatvian Wants to legalize recreational nukes 4d ago
All it takes is one to ruin the status quo.Â
26
u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago
The other solution is to give Ukraine nukes and then let the two have fun if Putin still wants to keep the war going.
Chad nukes in drone cropduster planes vs virgin ICBMs
8
18
u/SuperDevton112 Watch WW3 on paid TV 4d ago
A shame Russia has nukes
21
3
u/JesradSeraph 4d ago
At this point I think none of their nukes are truly functional.
1
u/SuperDevton112 Watch WW3 on paid TV 3d ago
Have that sentiment at your own peril as Iâm certain maintaining nukes is what a large chunk of the money in the Russian military goes to
2
u/Grand-Yellow1259 2d ago
Russia spends less than a third of what the US does to maintain twice the number of nukes. Plus, they couldn't stop people from stealing the fuel and critical components from systems they fully intended to use. Russia's nuclear program is either a shining paragon of non corruption and the most efficient use of government money on earth or it isn't.
3
3
1
u/Jawkess 4d ago
Nato and the US only get militarily involved if itâs a guaranteed curb stomping. Aka the country doesnât have nukes.
6
u/JesradSeraph 4d ago
There would be no nuking involved from conventionally destroying ru positions in occupied Ukraine. Change my mind.
0
1
112
86
u/cunasmoker69420 4d ago
It is my well researched opinion that we must resume bombing Belgrade immediately
233
u/OnDatReddit 5d ago
Let's not forget that the US put arms embargos on Croatia and Bosnia during the Yugoslav wars. While Serbs took over the majority of JNA arms and gear. Also don't forgot the part where the Bosnian army got to Banja Luka and then NATO threatened to bomb them if they went further.
157
u/Upbeat_Ad_7002 I will not rest until Bosnians flatten Belgrade to the ground 4d ago edited 4d ago
Serb nationalists like to pull the victim card when talking about the bombing of Belgrade but conveniently omit that both Croatia and Bosnia were threatened to stop advancing, and they did because they did not in fact want to fuck around and find out
28
u/HvalaBudala 4d ago
Not trying to defend Serb nationalists, but bombing of Beograd was a different war. That was 1999 Kosovo.
55
u/Upbeat_Ad_7002 I will not rest until Bosnians flatten Belgrade to the ground 4d ago
I know, I'm saying everyone got the same stern threat to stop regardless of which war it was
27
u/OnDatReddit 4d ago
Every war with them is basically the same war. Serb minorities in a country start making trouble when they are not ruled by Serbs. They don't know how to live peacefully as minorities.
6
u/OMGLOL1986 4d ago
Just remind them of how Turkey liberated them 600 years ago just like they tried to liberate KosovoÂ
16
u/DavidlikesPeace 4d ago
If anything that makes Serb nationalists look worse tho?Â
From 1990-99, got caught committing not 1 not 2 but 3 different genocides.Â
13
u/communist_leprechaun đľđ¸đłď¸ââ§ď¸đşđŚđşđ˛đŞđş 4d ago
That would require nuance in ncd
7
u/Sine_Fine_Belli THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION MUST FALL 4d ago
Fortunately there is a lot more nuance in noncredible defense
15
9
3
1
1
4d ago
[removed] â view removed comment
1
u/NonCredibleDefense-ModTeam 3d ago
Your comment was removed for violating Rule 1: Be Nice.
No personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
1.4k
u/mka10mka10 5d ago
I was suggesting we bomb Moscow, I was suggesting we send American pilots in and blow up all the bridges on the Volga.