r/NonCredibleDefense Irradiated Belt of Cobalt 5d ago

Arsenal of Democracy 🗽 30 years ago today

Post image
6.2k Upvotes

127 comments sorted by

1.4k

u/mka10mka10 5d ago

I was suggesting we bomb Moscow, I was suggesting we send American pilots in and blow up all the bridges on the Volga.

650

u/justamiqote 5d ago

We should have done that in 1945 tbh

543

u/mka10mka10 5d ago

Found Winston Churchills reencarnation

243

u/Snack378 Vive l'Ukraine 5d ago

Or Patton

88

u/LightningController 5d ago

Given some of the things he said about DPs, let’s hope it’s Winnie.

56

u/AnotherLie 4d ago

DPs? Did Patton have strong opinions about double penetration?

82

u/LightningController 4d ago

He said some pretty fucked up stuff about liberated camp prisoners (Displaced Persons).

https://www.thejc.com/news/world/general-patton-letter-in-which-he-refers-to-jews-as-sub-human-goes-on-sale-online-fjd9piht

So far as the Jews are concerned, they do not want to be placed in comfortable buildings. They actually prefer to live as many to a room as possible. They have no conception of sanitation, hygiene or decency and are, as you know, the same sub-human types that we saw in the internment camps.

58

u/AnotherLie 4d ago

OH.

OH NO.

I had no idea what DP stood for. Fuck.

5

u/SolKaynn 3d ago

DEADPOOL HOW COULD YOU!??

39

u/Nadare3 4d ago

Is this a literal "the children yearn for the mines" ?

19

u/DeHerg 4d ago

"...by the scurrilous attacks made on me by the non-Arian press"

But he did know what side he was supposed to be on, right?

27

u/LightningController 4d ago

It’s gotta be kept in mind that ‘stopping the Nazis from murdering people’ wasn’t the top of most people’s reasons to fight the Nazis at the time. Heck, one reason the Roosevelt administration initially covered up reports about the Holocaust presented to them by the Polish government-in-exile was to not make it look like they were fighting a ‘war for Jews’ as the isolationist press and German propaganda accused them of. A lot of the US establishment would have been quite happy to see the Nazis murder half of Europe, so long as they had an actual assurance that they would keep it to their side of the ocean and not go global with it. (And not just the US establishment; the Soviets, of course, were helping Hitler with his murders as long as they could, and the Entente, well, their record speaks for itself)

Hitler fucked himself over more by breaking deals and making that kind of assurance untenable than by his actual atrocities.

8

u/Sliderisk 4d ago

Bibi furiously scribbling notes in the corner and smiling

→ More replies (0)

2

u/CheekiBleeki 3000 nuclear warning-shots of De Gaulle 4d ago

Holy fucking shit.

2

u/Meem-Thief 50 nuclear bombs of MacArthur 4d ago

What about MacArthur

3

u/hazzap913 4d ago

Nuke it instead

1

u/aWalkingCarpet 3d ago

Or Groves

98

u/g2petter 4d ago

Operation Unthinkable Unfathomably Based

9

u/janosslyntsjowls 4d ago

Operation Saint Olga

110

u/Geo_NL 4d ago edited 4d ago

It took the Soviet Union years to get nukes. Imagine the leverage the US actually had as only nuclear power at the end of WW2.

"Oh, you don't want to fuck off out of East-Germany?". "What's this? Nice place, want to keep it that way?".

Instead we got the painful decades for all the countries behind the Iron Curtain. To this day the damage is still noticeable in those societies.

104

u/Brogan9001 4d ago edited 4d ago

True, however on the other hand, the fact the US didn’t use its status as the only nuclear power to lord over the world indefinitely and glass anyone trying to develop nukes shows an insane level of self control (and a lot of war-weariness). Doubt any other country at the time would show that much restraint.

9

u/Sevchenko874 2d ago

"b-but muh warmonger US narrative !!!1!1!111!" -a tankie, probably

44

u/Jackbuddy78 4d ago edited 4d ago

Soviet Union had interceptors that could down B-29s by the late '40s and plenty of them. They weren't making kamikaze aircraft and a few Zero fighters. 

The result would have just been another ground war with periodic attempts to strike cities with WMDs. It really wasn't until ICBMs came online in the 1960s that the US could assuredly deliver a large amount of nuclear strikes against the Eastern Bloc. 

-10

u/ain92ru 4d ago

Actually, already in 1945 over its home territory. Also, the US had very few nukes after the end of WWII, which were pretty inaccurate and could only be used against cities. Moreover, not a lot of B-29s were adapted for them, but that could be easily fixed. Much harder to fix was the lack of cartographic information to find strategic targets in the parts of the territory never occupied by Germans (it took U-2s and satellites IRL).

Besides decent fighters and radars to protect the cities, USSR had T-44s and IS-3 tanks in serial production which were vastly superior to any Western tanks, decent stocks of artillery ammunition, upgraded military plants and a huge combat-proven land army.

The postwar planning in the West assumed the Soviet Army would have steamrolled to the English Channel in, IIRC, half a year, occupied all Germany and practically all continental France, and the Western forces would have to defend on the Alps and Pyrenees

14

u/Princep_Krixus 4d ago

"Vastl superior to western tanks" so yea. Tell me you think Ukraine is a fair and responsible military operation lol.

The Russians tanks have been time and time again shown to have been paper tigers. The only reason they didnt well in any conflict was pure numbers. Even then half of them broke down. And yet they had so many it didnt matter. The Russians fucking loved the western tanks they got on lend lease, because they actually fucking worked.

Russian propaganda at its finest.

1

u/Jkay064 18h ago

Always remember that the Soviets had a special department of propaganda up until the 1990s expressly to falsely boast that WW2 Soviet armor was good. They are the pettiest morons on the planet.

-5

u/ain92ru 4d ago

Ukraine has been a predictable catastrophe and Putin is a war criminal. That has noting to do with the fact Russian tanks are not worse than the Western ones (have you heard about Western tanks breaking down in Ukraine? If not, maybe you have a social media bubble), the problem of the RuAF is not in tanks.

The reason crews preferred Lend Lease tanks was because they were comfy! Ukrainian tankers quip that Western armor is "built for people" as opposed to the Soviet one built to achieve the desired combat characteristics.

Still, as the Russo-Ukrainian war illustrates perfectly, two T-62s are more useful in a war than one Challenger 2 even if the former are slightly cramped for 180-cm folks and lack an on-board tea-making facility

12

u/mka10mka10 4d ago

for tanks built to have desired combat characteristics theyre certainly shit at that

4

u/gingerfreddy 2d ago

What? Nuking eastern europe to liberate it?

I wanted to write a long post here but just please think about how a nuclear war in eastern europe would have damaged said societies.

"Man Stalin sure sucked with all that ethnic cleansing and political executions, I wish someone would NUKE US as the path to liberation"

Motherfucker the US bomber nearly every semi-permanent structure in Vietnam and northern Korea. They did not surrender. 

Only boots on the ground would ensure a liberated eastern europe. So, marching an exhausted Britain, german auxiliaries, barely reorganisering france after their civil war, and whatever allied minors were on hand into a freshly nuked USSR? The Red Army was freakishly powerful in 1945, and nuking it out of existence would require tens of millions of deaths, including civillians what the fuck are you smoking the Red Army stood in the very countries you want to liberate in this scenario

This all of course relying on the US having enough nukes and the air power to actually fly them over USSR home soil. Which I am unsure about. 

47

u/Nordalin 4d ago

We couldn't, unfortunately.

2World2War just wasn't meant to be

21

u/Cliffinati 4d ago

Second sunrise in Moscow

Sept 1 1945

2

u/NowAlexYT 3d ago

The USSR shouldve been invaded and split into occuoation zones like germany before they had any nukes

1

u/The_Motarp 1d ago

That was never going to happen. The Red Army was more powerful than all their potential opponents combined and the US could have only produced a relatively small number of nukes before the first Russian ones became available. Much of Russia's military production was on the far side of the Urals where the US wouldn't have been able to nuke them even if they got past the Red Air Force. The public in the US, UK, and France, would never have supported the horrific war that would have resulted from going against the USSR.

6

u/Kaiser_Defender 4d ago

WWWOOOO WORLD WAR 3

97

u/RussiaIsBestGreen 4d ago

My favorite part is that the last time I saw the original clip it was from a channel posting it to act like Biden was a bad guy.

119

u/mka10mka10 4d ago

I mean there is a giant crowd who think that the UN and NATO were the bad guys in Bosnia and that the Serbs were innocent

96

u/meowtiger explosively-formed badposter 4d ago

those people are pretty much all serbs tho right

90

u/mka10mka10 4d ago

Either serbs, americans who hate nato without knowing anything about it or a series of code originating out of Belarus

4

u/Reddit_Adminh8 2d ago

ie:serbs and tankies

11

u/mickey_kneecaps 4d ago

Nah plenty of western far left and far right folk think this. Jeremy Corbyn being a prominent example.

15

u/Bookworm_AF Catboy War Criminal 4d ago

Revanchist Serbs, campists, and fascists. Give 'em all the Belgrade special.

44

u/Beginning-Suspect686 4d ago

Jeremy Corbyn and Momentum. Plus Tucker Carlson.

Also large fraction of Serbia and all of Russia.

42

u/mka10mka10 4d ago

stop the genocide unless its nato stopping it then theyre imperialists

14

u/TheLoneWolfMe 4d ago edited 4d ago

Jeremy Corbyn

Tucker Carlson

Horseshoe theory proven right once again.

5

u/morgisboard 3000 black abacus beads of oryx 3d ago

Also Noam Chomsky

4

u/TARANTULA_TIDDIES 4d ago

Also the rather popular youtuber "ididathing" plus his one friend

3

u/Sine_Fine_Belli THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION MUST FALL 4d ago

14

u/mloiii 4d ago

Was? Why past tense? Yesterday belgrade tomorrow moscow.

6

u/wanderingmanimal 4d ago

It is ALWAYS on the table…and encouraged as the most practical option

3

u/ujm556 3d ago

Why stop there? You can bomb all the oil refineries into dust, cut off all their oil and gas pipelines and railways, and take out russian airbases. Then move on to their industrial sector, and doing operation Grassland Storm against russian troops. Oh, and bomb Putin's vacation houses, just for fun. Lastly, sign a deal where russians are forced to hand over their nuclear weapons, which they won't be able to maintain anyway since they got bombed back to stone age.

3

u/mka10mka10 3d ago

Lets bomb Stonehenge back to the stone age

2

u/ujm556 3d ago

Meaning russia is already in stone age? If so, then it would be bombing stonehenge back to the mesozoic

-2

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

5

u/mka10mka10 4d ago

The biden who was he was just older and the media only highlighted when he struggled with his speech impediment

1.1k

u/JesradSeraph 5d ago

Sooooooo… Operation Deliberate Force 2.0 against russia when ?

968

u/External-Option-544 Saabmissive & Sweadable 5d ago

If Russia didn’t have nuclear weapons, it would have already happened. They don’t stand a chance in a conventional conflict with NATO.

Unfortunately, Russia does have nukes. However, the West can still transfer the $245 billion in frozen Russian assets to Ukraine, allowing them to arm themselves to the teeth. This drip-feeding of support really needs to stop.

353

u/Sosemikreativ 5d ago

I assume doing that kind of stuff to international funding would escalate into corporate and banking mayhem. Half the world is made up of insanely rich dictatorships that equally like to prepare for some sort of regional war and invest their wealth in Western countries. Imagine what happens to the Western economies and banks when these nations realize their wealth will just be taken from them and given to the enemy once they start their pet project war of aggression. That's probably why it's just frozen.

235

u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago edited 4d ago

Maybe housing in London and elsewhere will finally be affordable when the properties owned by dictators' shell companies suddenly all get dumped onto the market.

A documentary on how London is a major center of money laundering, including Russian oligarchs, and how it's easy for the oligarchs to lawyer up in the UK to shut down investigative journalists. The Financial Times themselves said they have lost legal battles against individuals that they attempted to investigate, because those people probably have even deeper pockets than the FT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyk12Wf_TeQ

67

u/iwumbo2 Canadian nuke program when? 4d ago

Solve the western housing crisis and financially ruin dictatorships in one move? That's two birds with one stone, why aren't we doing this? Are we stupid?

34

u/FalconMirage Mirage 2000 my beloved 4d ago

why aren’t we doing this ?

They pay big bribes

6

u/kirillre4 4d ago

Governments don't have any housing problems and really love dictatorships' money, so that would be completely counterproductive to them.

92

u/Obvious-Ranger-2235 5d ago

That's part of the reason. Also a lot of Western companies have assets overseas. Any or all of which could be seized in immediate retaliation.

59

u/Sasquatch1729 4d ago

True, but many western companies have already had their assets stolen (for example, jets in Russia were commandeered during the early days of the war).

https://avweb.com/aviation-news/russia-seized-10-times-more-airliners-than-it-lost-to-sanctions/

Also many companies are selling their assets because they can't get any wealth out of them and they may as well sell before the Russians seize their stuff anyway.

They can use the funds as leverage to get the Russians to give back these assets, or use the fund to pay off Western companies' losses for investing in Russia.

I'd rather see the money go to Ukraine, but I have a feeling this is what they're saving it for.

42

u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago

Russia also stole Oneweb's satellites that were supposed to be launched with Russian rockets: https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/05/oneweb_takes_229m_hit_from/

3

u/TARANTULA_TIDDIES 4d ago

That shit has already happened in russia

3

u/gronlund2 4d ago

Yeah, it was a semi valid reason before Russia took airplanes and seized businesses, now the goal should be to rob them blind.

If there's even a skateboard in the west owned by a russian it should be seized and sent to Ukraine, I'm sure there's kids there who would enjoy it

13

u/x1rom 4d ago

Also it's a coercive item to end the war. If Russia gets the money back, it means that there's more incentive to end the war. If the assets are just gone, then Russia loses out either way, and it gets less likely for Russia to end the war early.

10

u/TARANTULA_TIDDIES 4d ago

If Russia gets that money back as part of a "peace" theyre just going to use that money to rebuild their military for another try within 5-10years

3

u/Cultural_Blueberry70 4d ago

They should only be able to use it as the first installment of their reparations to Ukraine.

1

u/hx87 14h ago

Most of those investments are in non-productive, rent-seeking sectors of the economy, like finance, insurance and real estate, not industry, technology or productive services. Cutting off those investments might actually help unfuck western economies.

Of course the governing classes in the West are also heavily invested in FIRE, which is probably why value added taxes are ubiquitous but land value taxes (the most efficient taxes possible) are nonexistent.

34

u/tukkerdude 4d ago

Amen im in the Netherlands and voted for a political party that supported ukraine full stop and will do so again next election. This is one of the very few cases ware further violence IS the solution!

20

u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago

War! Huh! What is it good for? Huh! Stopping Russia’s baseless invasions!

3

u/tukkerdude 3d ago

By the MIGHT of OUR collective DEMOCRACY WE SHALL AID our ALLIES in the EAST!!! GLORY to UKRAINE!!! VICTORY is INEVITABLE!!!

20

u/Rambos_Magnum_Dong 4d ago

They barely stand a chance in a conventional conflict with Ukraine.

8

u/FocusBro2024 4d ago

Nah, clearly Russia could win any day, they just haven’t been trying hard enough, if daddy Putin gives the go they could easily take it over in half a second /s

41

u/RarityNouveau 4d ago

I really want to believe that all the nukes that Russia has are actually just as run down and broken as the rest of their military.

36

u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago

Once Russia inevitably implodes post Putin, we’re gonna find out they have 3 or 4 functional nukes, and for some reason MS-13 or some Mexican Drug Cartel has like, 12 they accidentally bought ages ago

22

u/realif3 4d ago

I swear to God back when WikiLeaks was big I read about nukes in Mexico.

29

u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago

I mean, a Russian Admiral nearly sold the cartel a fully loaded and function nuclear submarine. The cartel was the one who backed out upon realizing that the missiles would be included, hilariously enough

29

u/AlliedMasterComp 4d ago

The cartel was the one who backed out upon realizing that the missiles would be included, hilariously enough

Becoming a strategic level threat to the US Military in the western hemisphere is generally an ill advised move.

7

u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago

Let’s be fair, with just one sub they’d probably be an operational level threat. But yeah, I just find it hilarious to hear the cartels be the adults in the room yknow?

9

u/FocusBro2024 4d ago

“Listen, I may chop guys head off and skin them alive, but I know Mr America up there will do the same to me if a buy this shit”

6

u/ChosenUndead15 3d ago

As much of vicious bloodthirsty beast they are, they didn't get far without knowing they if they bite more than they could chew they would be death and worse because every direct opponent is also a vicious bloodthirsty beast.

6

u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 3d ago

I will say, the idea of them going through with it and then doing a comic villain “hold the US hostage until you legalize drugs/crime” thing would be funny as fuck

→ More replies (0)

22

u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago

Something something not wanting to attract unwanted attention (e.g. a CIA's SAC/SOG team blackbagging the cartel leadership at night for extraordinary rendition, or outright assassinations) when they're already raking in billions of USD annually from their operations.

13

u/MsMercyMain Glory to Mike Sparks and the Aero Gavin 4d ago

Oh that’s definitely why, I just think it’s peak non credibility that a cartel is more credible at risk assessment over a Russian Admiral. IIRC he got caught because the fucking cartels ratted him out

1

u/Reddit_Adminh8 2d ago

Imagine the cartels just wind up with enriched uranium as a byproduct of starting their own nuclear power plants for meth superlabs and breaking into the AI datacenter game

8

u/OrdinaryLatvian Wants to legalize recreational nukes 4d ago

All it takes is one to ruin the status quo. 

26

u/Blueberryburntpie 4d ago

The other solution is to give Ukraine nukes and then let the two have fun if Putin still wants to keep the war going.

Chad nukes in drone cropduster planes vs virgin ICBMs

2

u/uzu_afk 3d ago

Not to be confused with the 245 frozen russian asshats!

8

u/TheOnlyFallenCookie Woke & Wehrhaft 4d ago

Should have been Feb 25th 2022

18

u/SuperDevton112 Watch WW3 on paid TV 4d ago

A shame Russia has nukes

21

u/-rogerwilcofoxtrot- 4d ago

So do we, which means they're off the table.

3

u/JesradSeraph 4d ago

At this point I think none of their nukes are truly functional.

1

u/SuperDevton112 Watch WW3 on paid TV 3d ago

Have that sentiment at your own peril as I’m certain maintaining nukes is what a large chunk of the money in the Russian military goes to

2

u/Grand-Yellow1259 2d ago

Russia spends less than a third of what the US does to maintain twice the number of nukes. Plus, they couldn't stop people from stealing the fuel and critical components from systems they fully intended to use. Russia's nuclear program is either a shining paragon of non corruption and the most efficient use of government money on earth or it isn't.

3

u/Dotcaprachiappa 3d ago

Operation Good Offence Is The Best Defence.

3

u/Kreol1q1q Most mentally stable FCAS simp 2d ago

Belgrade is still right there, you know….

1

u/Jawkess 4d ago

Nato and the US only get militarily involved if it’s a guaranteed curb stomping. Aka the country doesn’t have nukes.

6

u/JesradSeraph 4d ago

There would be no nuking involved from conventionally destroying ru positions in occupied Ukraine. Change my mind.

0

u/Designer-Film-3663 4d ago

Fortunately Europe isn't military capable enough to do it.

1

u/UsedCarr0t 3d ago

What did republika srpska do this time?

112

u/Euphoric_Number_8770 5d ago

One of the best examples when you fuck around and find out

86

u/cunasmoker69420 4d ago

It is my well researched opinion that we must resume bombing Belgrade immediately

233

u/OnDatReddit 5d ago

Let's not forget that the US put arms embargos on Croatia and Bosnia during the Yugoslav wars. While Serbs took over the majority of JNA arms and gear. Also don't forgot the part where the Bosnian army got to Banja Luka and then NATO threatened to bomb them if they went further.

157

u/Upbeat_Ad_7002 I will not rest until Bosnians flatten Belgrade to the ground 4d ago edited 4d ago

Serb nationalists like to pull the victim card when talking about the bombing of Belgrade but conveniently omit that both Croatia and Bosnia were threatened to stop advancing, and they did because they did not in fact want to fuck around and find out

28

u/HvalaBudala 4d ago

Not trying to defend Serb nationalists, but bombing of Beograd was a different war. That was 1999 Kosovo.

55

u/Upbeat_Ad_7002 I will not rest until Bosnians flatten Belgrade to the ground 4d ago

I know, I'm saying everyone got the same stern threat to stop regardless of which war it was

27

u/OnDatReddit 4d ago

Every war with them is basically the same war. Serb minorities in a country start making trouble when they are not ruled by Serbs. They don't know how to live peacefully as minorities.

6

u/OMGLOL1986 4d ago

Just remind them of how Turkey liberated them 600 years ago just like they tried to liberate Kosovo 

16

u/DavidlikesPeace 4d ago

If anything that makes Serb nationalists look worse tho? 

From 1990-99, got caught committing not 1 not 2 but 3 different genocides. 

13

u/communist_leprechaun 🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️🇺🇦🇺🇲🇪🇺 4d ago

That would require nuance in ncd

7

u/Sine_Fine_Belli THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION MUST FALL 4d ago

Fortunately there is a lot more nuance in noncredible defense

39

u/Nhobdy 4d ago

Oh god, it's NATO WITH THE STEEL CHAIR

4

u/Scottish_Whiskey 4d ago

Oh my god it’s a chair!

45

u/Gyvon 4d ago

Belgrade delenda est.

15

u/Kerbal_Guardsman F-15 is the best 4d ago

Belgrade?  Belgorod?  All the same to me!

10

u/Nosen 4d ago

Is that the old Serbian flag??

9

u/I_did_a_fucky_wucky ▇▅▆▇▆▅▅█ 4d ago

Thank you USA! You are my new best friend!

3

u/Every-Dress-8221 4d ago

When NATO somehow decided to help a muslim majority country

1

u/Wallhacks360 2d ago

HE'S SUGGGESTINGGGG

1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/NonCredibleDefense-ModTeam 3d ago

Your comment was removed for violating Rule 1: Be Nice.

No personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.