Image Description: In big text, all caps: “Content Warning” preceded by the following: “There are topics in this book some readers might be sensitive to. You're about to read MM, dubcon, unaliving bad guys, close-call sexual assault (with no gRape), kid-napping, stepbrother lovin', and FF scenes that occur before the harem builds. If any of these things trigger you, please plan on skipping the scenes or finding something else to suit”.
I’m just fucking ✨mad✨. The book is an example, but my rant is on a broader focus.
TL;DR: there isn’t a reason to consider marginalized identities as sensitive, triggering, sexual, or adult topics—whether in media or real life. We should strive for neutral discoverability that respects all readers and their autonomy rather than alienating marginalized groups to protect the comfort of non-marginalized communities.
Definitions: What is a Content Warning, Trigger Warning, Theme, and Mature Theme?
Content warnings (CWs) are a broad umbrella about possibly sensitive topics and intense material. At its core, they are content that needs to be warned about.
Examples:
- Graphic violence
- Self-harm
- Sexual assault
Trigger warnings (TWs), which originated between the 1960s to 1990s through feminist movements and psychology/psychiatry, focus more narrowly on preventing traumitization. They are warning about triggering topics.
Examples:
- Kidnapping and abduction
- Islamophobia
- Antisemitism
- Transmisogyny
- Animal cruelty or death
- Demonization of mental illness
Themes mean that an element has a significant narrative focus. It doesn’t just “exist” (EX: An Afrolatina character), but it’s examined meaningfully (EX: the Afrolatina character struggling with colorism and identity).
Examples:
- Pacifism
- Environmentalism
- Heritage
- Marriage
Mature themes (MT) function largely as a rating category content deemed not suitable for children. It doesn’t need to be graphic, just too complex for children to comprehend deeply.
Examples:
- Graphic Sex
- Drug use
- Violence
- Profanity
How these concepts differ.
- TWs are CWs, but not all CWs are TWs. CWs aren’t warnings specifically related to trauma and are largely for items of discomfort or aversion.
- MT normally isn’t part of CW and TW’s dom/sub relationship. They’re typically with their found family of MPAA/MPA and ESRB ratings (PG, PG-13, M, NC 17+, etc). Even so, mediums outside of films and gaming have used the term to describe “mature” themes.
Let’s review!
- Content Warning (CW): broad warning for possibly sensitive content or content that can cause discomfort.
- Trigger Warning (TW): narrow focus traumatizing subjects.
- Themes: meaningful narrative focus on an element.
- Mature Themes (MT): rating shorthand for content isn’t suitable for children.
We are now on the same page, yes? 🥰
If someone defends queer identities, ethnicities, disabilities, and religions as needing to be content warned, trigger warned, or given a “mature theme” categorization, I’m whacking you with my chancla.
The cheek, the nerve, the gall, the audacity, and the gumption.
Warnings Can Go Too Far
Sometimes, there’s this bizarreness I see in some romance material: warnings and mature theme categorizations slapped onto marginalized identities, such as bisexuality, demiromanticism, MLM relationships, trans people, autism, or some flavor of non-penis-in-vagina (PIV) intimacy. These aren’t neutrally tagged as elements; they were listed as content that may trigger you.
Right next to dub con, rape, and assault.
Meanwhile, neurotypical people, endosex people, cisgender people, hetero identities, man-woman relationships, and PIV get a free pass. No warnings. No nothing.
Anyone want to ELI5 why? 🤔
There is a long, brutal history regarding the sexualization and adultification of marginalized identities that has followed us into modernity, whether we like it or not. Non-PIV intimacy is routinely hypersexualized and delegitimized in comparison to PIV, including “sex” definition homogeneity and BDSM and kink demonization. Non-PIV intimacy being anomalized as inherently too graphic, sexual, or adult is contributing to sex-negative rhetoric that shames sexual expression and creates arbitrary criteria on what type of sexual expression is “normal” and “natural”.
When {Breeding Clinic by Alexis Osborne} had that list of “mature themes” include demisexuality and anal and “sword crossing”, but PIV and heterosexuality weren’t included—
tutting aggressively
If you find that it’s reasonable to prescribe specific identities, experiences, and configurations as triggering, sensitive, sexual, or graphic topics or content warnings—what does this look like when applied to reality?
In the words of that opening line from Round 1 from Pentagon’s (😭) bonus track, let’s find out!
- Before you go inside that Walmart, I see three Muslim women inside. If that’s not okay, we can go to a different Walmart. [There are several people there with markings for Ash Wednesday.]
- Love to recommend you a vet for your pet! But he’s gay and married to a man. Is that okay? Will you be okay with that, or…? [Your past vet was a man married to a woman and you didn’t even know he was married until he brought it up.]
- [We go see a movie and in the movie’s warnings, it says “Contains graphic sex, profanity, and black people”. 98% of the cast is white.]
- You have kids? I’m not sure if you should take them to the fair. It’s not all that safe there and it’s just going to confuse your kids and give them ideas. One of them could be snatched up there too. [shows you a flyer for a family-friendly Pride festival which gives clear hours when the festival will be 21+. A local security firm, masses of trained volunteers, and the American Red Cross will be working as well. Your kids are 17 and 15.]
DM, I would like to do an Eldritch Blast to vent my anger 🥰
Now those examples might seem not at all in the same vein as content warnings about MLM or Hinduism in a book—but they are. Because you are still actively warning about and moralizing specific identities and experiences while finding other identities and experiences barely worth a footnote. You are picking and choosing what needs permission to exist normally and naturally and what doesn’t.
How is that fair or okay?
You don’t need to “content warn” about a Hindu anymore than you content warn about a Christian. A character being acespec isn’t a “mature theme”, just like heterosexuality ain’t. A woman loving another woman is not a “sensitive topic”, just as a heterogendered relationship. Anal and oral sex are not “adult content” anymore than PIV sex is. Because none of those are inherently dangerous, traumatic, disturbing, upsetting, sensitive, or “mature”.
When you warn about identities, you are pathologizing them as contaminating and harmful, especially when you shelve them in the same “triggering” or “sensitive” warning as sexual assault and rape.
That’s not giving a casual heads-up. That’s creating a binary that endosex cisgender able-bodied neurotypical white man-woman heterosexual, heteroromantic, heterogendered relationships with PIV sex are a default and whatever does not conform is a red flag. That is adhering to the rhetoric many use against marginalized identities in order to remove us from conversation.
Neutral Discoverability > Warning for Identities
“But I still think you should be told what’s inside a book! I have personal bad experiences with [things here]!”
✅
That’s why tagging and listing identities, configurations, religions, intimacies, and ethnicities is the best neutral and inclusive way for discoverability of elements.
Tagging and Listing
Here’s examples of neutral ways to list out a books contents that aim to respect reader autonomy while also respecting identities:
Subtitles
- Sapphic Omegaverse
- Achillean Guideverse
- NBi BDSM Romance
- Interracial Romance / BWAM
Listing
This book has:
- transmasc protagonist
- drag queen domme
- black female lead
- Jewish drag king
- forcefemming
- sadomasochism
- anal sex
- white agender character
Introduction/Foreword
The book that I write has characters and experience of a wide range. You’ll find a trans bloodthirsty gramma with shadow magic knitting a blanket for her grandson’s intersex boyfriend. I probably should have toned down all the tentacles and hand holding, but it was needed for plot reasons. But there’s some experiences in here that stem from my own life. The main couple’s femme son experiencing misogyny from his moms is one I faced with my androgyny with my queer parents.
This makes the content visible to people looking for those identities and experiences in a neutral way. It doesn’t imply that these are sensitive, triggering, or upsetting content. And in an industry that still prioritizes and gives hyper visibility to endocishet, white, vaguely Christian/Catholic, neurotypical, able-bodied protagonists and non-BDSM non-kinky dom-top-masc man and sub-bottom-femme woman relationships—we need this discoverability!
Why is this more neutral and inclusive than content warnings? I think content warnings give informed consent. You’re confusing what content warnings are.
Content warnings means warning about content. To warn means “to give notice beforehand of evil or danger; to put on guard; to caution, to advise that something should be avoided”.
In warning about the existence of non-Christian religions, 2SLGBTQIA+ people, POCs, the disabled—that’s not a neutral stance giving informed consent anymore. That’s telling you that these identities are ones readers need to be on guard of, that people should be cautious about; that readers may want avoid them. That’s misinforming you that those identities are advisories.
Discoverability should extend to dominating and hypervisible identities.
To me, it’s a good practice to still tag identities that dominate the industry or are hypervisible. This helps destigmatize marginalized identities. It supports parity, normalization, identity neutrality, and reader autonomy as well.
I’m grateful I found a book with a nonbinary love interest who presents trad-masc and uses he/him pronouns. The tagging gave me autonomy in reading what I want! But even though the main character is an endocishet white woman, her identities should also be tagged to further enhance discoverability, accessibility, and autonomy rather than assuming her identity would be some default and thus not needing to be discoverable.
Equal tagging = equal footing = people get to engage with the art they want.
Hanlon's razor: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by ignorance.”
It says stupidity but anyways.
I’m not attributing malice where ignorance can be explained because I don’t know them from Gaia. I don’t want to invalidate people who have had bad personal experiences that lent themselves to confirmation biases, yet they still don’t mistreat others.
But I’m not sure what other way I can stress that it’s offensive for someone to think that the nature of a sapphic relationship equals graphic sex, or that arospec needs the same warning as rape and assault. That sets a dangerous precedent that identities are content to be warned against and specific identities are inherently as vile as rape and assault. That allows people with malicious intent to take advantage of an ambiguous classification and weaponize it for their discriminating agendas.
If you still find it reasonable that some identities should be warned about, I have a few questions:
- How do you explain to your queer friends you find their orientations are on the same level as sexual predation and violence but you being endocishet is normal and fine?
- How do you explain to your Jewish friend that them existing as a Jew is something you warn people about, but you as a Christian should be accepted anywhere and everywhere?
- How do you explain to someone with DID or autism or BPD or they require mobility aids—that them existing is socially upsetting and uncomfortable for people to be around? But you being able-bodied and neurotypical are socially safe and sound.
- How do you tell your friend that them being in an interracial relationship is a mature topic that may need to be avoided in conversation? But you as a white person are married to another white person and that right there is safe for everyone.
Life and art intersect. How you frame the existence of identities is not absolved from criticism just because it’s about a book’s contents. And this is deeper than books.
Many activist organizations have fought the MPA/MPAA, the Hays Code, and other organizations for their enforcement of explicit categorizations for queer and POC content that were less explicit than endocishet, white content. We saw how many weeks ago of queer authors who were targeted in the deindexation of NSFW content due to an Australian hate group and payment processors—and some queer authors spoke about how their work was SFW yet yoinked.
It’s been so widely and historically normalized to adulify and sexualize marginalized and less visible identities in every medium—especially by artists who aren’t themselves those identities—that people correlate normalization to justification without any deeper examination. And I can’t deny that a lot of intersectionality is lost among the book community as POC, queer, and disabled readers and artists feel unwelcome to speak up in “diverse” and “safe” spaces that still largely cater to endocishet white able-bodied neurotypical voices.
But I will fucking die on this motherfucking hill* that we don’t deserve to be content warned, especially not in the same goddamn breath as rape and assault.
Be neutral. Support autonomy. Respect everyone.
Neutrality is boring. It doesn’t skew positive or negative. It has no objective stance beyond, “This exists. Okay. The end.” It, instead, forces you to draw your own conclusions.
And that’s the most wonderful and respectful stance to take.
Categorizing elements neutrally optimizes respect for autonomy. You get to decide if you personally feel that something is harmful to you rather than someone making the choice for all of us. And no one’s identities are negatively affected in that process.
This doesn’t mean trigger warnings and content warnings should disappear. But because they have been used in negatively moralizing diversity, there needs to be constant reformations in warnings and their criteria based on context and impact.
I want readers to read what they want. We should protect and defend reader autonomy. And we can do that without alienating marginalized and less visible communities, I promise you.
All right.
Bye 👋🏾
Supportive Material
* Bridgland, Victoria. “Cautionary Notes: The Science of Trigger Warnings.” Association for Psychological Science - APS, 19 Oct. 2023, www.psychologicalscience.org/news/utc-2023-oct-trigger-warnings.html.
* “Content Warnings | Centre for Teaching Excellence.” Uwaterloo.ca, 21 May 2024, uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/catalogs/tip-sheets/content-warnings.
* Filipovic, Jill. “We’ve Gone Too Far with “Trigger Warnings” | Jill Filipovic.” The Guardian, The Guardian, 20 Sept. 2017, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/05/trigger-warnings-can-be-counterproductive.
* Garnar, Martin. “Trigger Warnings: History, Theory, Context , Edited by Emily J. M. Knox.” Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy, vol. 3, no. 2-3, 2018, pp. 12–13, journals.ala.org/index.php/jifp/article/view/6738/9332.
* George, Vishal . “The Psychology of Trigger Warnings.” Behaviouralbydesign.com, 2018, www.behaviouralbydesign.com/post/the-psychology-of-trigger-warnings.
* Motion Picture Association of America. ““G” Is for Golden: The MPAA Film Ratings at 50.” Motion Picture Association of America, Nov. 2018. 🔗 [**PDF**](https://www.motionpictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/G-is-for-Golden.pdf)
* The Vocal. “A History of Trigger Warnings, and the Price and Diversity of Pain.” Medium, 17 Mar. 2016, medium.com/the-vocal/a-history-of-trigger-warnings-and-the-price-and-diversity-of-pain-ac8e796d0d70.
* Trigger, Language. “Inclusive Language: Trigger & Content Warnings.” University Housing, 11 Feb. 2025, www.housing.wisc.edu/2025/02/inclusive-language-triggers-and-content-warnings/. Accessed 26 Aug. 2025.
* University of Michigan. “An Introduction to Content Warnings and Trigger Warnings Overview.” University of Michigan. 🔗 [**PDF**](https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/equitable-teaching/wp-content/uploads/sites/853/2020/09/An-Introduction-to-Content-Warnings-and-Trigger-Warnings-PDF.pdf)