r/UFOs 6d ago

Disclosure New Army Witness - Former Intelligence officer Caison Best shares his UFO experience - "Massive, perfectly still, elliptical object". The panels on the object seemed to be moving and rippling. “I can relate to… being a caveman and seeing an iPhone for the first time. It was just a shocking object.”

Caison was ignored by his chain of command, they tried burying this story, until he was connected with Ryan Graves' organization "Americans for Safe Aerospace".

https://x.com/uncertainvector/status/1962972294470627385

https://twitter-thread.com/t/1962970646222180738

In 2022, near Cheyenne Mountain Space Force Base, Caison and four colleagues witnessed a UAP. What happened next reveals how institutions fail those who serve.

The next day, Caison filed a formal intelligence report with corroborating witness accounts.

Instead of urgency, he was met with indifference. Reporting channels were buried. Official replies were dismissive. This was over one of America’s most sensitive security sites.

That could have been the end. But in 2023, Caison connected with ASA (Americans for Safe Aerospace. By 2024, he was leading our reporting program. Since then, he has helped process nearly 800 reports and interviewed 50+ credible witnesses, many of them aviators and intelligence officers.

The lesson is clear.
Institutions are failing credible witnesses. Civil society must step in.

3.3k Upvotes

427 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/PCmndr 6d ago

No his testimony will be ignored because it is not falsifiable evidence.

50

u/MrNostalgiac 6d ago

This is really the crux of things.

These testimonies aren't dismissed for being false. They are being dismissed because they can't be proven to be true.

These stories are important - but they aren't enough. We need a smoking gun.

4

u/Graz_570 6d ago

Agreed, but what does a smoking gun look like at this point? I’m so jaded with the whole process. If a picture or video is too perfect it’s AI. If it’s blurry, grainy or out of focus it’s a plane, bird or star. I totally agree with everything you said but would we know what a smoking gun looks like at this point? I’m afraid not, even if they put the barrel in our collective mouths.

8

u/MrNostalgiac 6d ago

There's actually a number of ways we could get it. But the bar is unfortunately high.

  • Physical evidence that can be proven to be non-human being a reasonable doubt. A ship would do but I guess anything sufficiently impossible to recreate will do.

  • Government disclosure. I'll wait for you to stop laughing. Doesn't need to be USA though, so possible, but unlikely.

  • Scientific disclosure. Far more likely. If UAP can be detected, we don't necessarily need the military or government.

  • A mass sighting. There have been mass sightings before but it really needs to be unambiguous and heavily captured by the public.

I don't think personally collected, isolated photo or video will do at this point.

2

u/startedposting 6d ago

-Physical evidence is near impossible to obtain, tightly locked down and secured

-I agree and if we’re talking government disclosure, likely China. But I think what stops them both is socioeconomic implications.

-A good one, until you realize some of the best scientific instruments still have the military’s hand in it, an example is right in front of us today. NASA has claimed FOIA exemption for data being collected by the JWST. Truly a baffling move.

-Mass sightings rely on chance and so, it’s the best form of disclosure but who knows when the next one will be?

6

u/indo-anabolic 6d ago

What's your source on the JWST FOIA exemption? I cant find anything on a blanket exception, just a 12 month EAP. Wouldn't put it past them, though, maybe that's where the Constellation does its work.