r/UFOs • u/87LucasOliveira • 4d ago
Disclosure "Whatever had appeared over the base was basically bigger than a football field. - A red cube with some wierd thing in the center of it." - Rep Anna Luna describes a giant red UFO witnessed by Boeing contractors at Vandenberg AFB in 2003 - Jeffrey Nuccetelli will speak about this case in Congress.
62
u/masterleadermusic 4d ago
Not commenting on the validity of the witness, story, etc... but just the image.
It always cracks me up when the image someone posts along a description doesn't match it. The headline literally says Red cube but the image is not a cube and it's red on the inside...but it's not red on the outside.
I see this quite a bit.
Anyway, thank you for reading my low-quality observation.
7
8
u/DuckworthBuckington 4d ago
Your observation has just as much worth as any witness testimony. There’s no photos, no physical evidence, nothing. Just a claim that someone somewhere at one point apparently saw something. It’s not disclosure, it’s a campfire story.
Even if every single person that heard it, believed it, so what? It’s gone now. Should’ve taken a picture I guess, oh well!
5
u/AltruisticBall42 3d ago
Exactly there have been many similar stories that i can't even count that claim abductions, alien encounters, ufo sightings 50 ft in front of them but what of it. I personally believe in the phenomenon but its not going anywhere with the trust me I saw it story.
-4
u/xOrion12x 3d ago
How about you actually do some research. How the hell do you ever expect to learn anything? The proof of this encounter is one of the most documented cases ever and has countless witnesses.
-8
u/xOrion12x 3d ago
There is overwhelming proof of this encounter. It's on Chris melons podcast.
7
u/danielperi1 3d ago
Well, Elizondo had "proof" too and testified in front of congress. Turned out it was a photo of an irrigation field...
0
u/xOrion12x 3d ago
This isn't that. There are also hundreds of witnesses involved.
0
u/iavon 2d ago
And no one took a photo or video?
1
u/xOrion12x 2d ago
Im sure there is plenty. The security officer talks about all the evidence they most likely have. There were hundreds of witnesses. It was on one of the most secure bases in the world. They dont just carry around their cellphones when this happened.
1
u/snapplepapple1 3d ago
Yeah same here. Maybe its just me or the ai, but I still dont know with certainty whether it was originally seen as a cube or something flatter like that image because I feel like we've heard it both ways. I can probably dig up the original description, but its just a funny detail that its been show in so many different forms.
1
u/xOrion12x 3d ago
A red square that was fairly flat was how I heard it from the guy with the evidence.
1
0
u/DoomfistIsNotOp 2d ago
I know it's not a perfect cube with every edge having the same length but I believe the object depicted in the example may still be considered a cube. A cube of length X=75, Y=75, and Z=15 for example
61
u/Jest_Kidding420 4d ago
Just heard a similar case on this 1977 National UFO reporting center audio, time stamp around 4:34:30
https://youtube.com/watch?v=-IMVgxOJx4Q&lc=Ugwoxi35T_cle6lWDfZ4AaABAg&si=LtZ-IB_BlWatXCZJ
15
11
3
u/WanderingRobotStudio 4d ago
Excellent resource.
7
u/Jest_Kidding420 4d ago
It is, what’s also really interesting is I’ve so far heard countless cases of sightings similar to the New Jersey drone sworn
44
u/Allison1228 4d ago
Can you think of a place more likely to have multiple operational security cameras than an Air Force base?
25
14
3
u/you_know_i_be_poopin 2d ago
Video cameras, radar, thermal, IR, probably other sensors we don't even know exist.
3
41
u/srosa707 4d ago
FWIW, I worked with the guy and was at VAFB at this time. I responded to this a year or two ago when it first came up during Ryan Graves testimony and gave a response to a lot of the criticisms I’m reading here today. Dudes not a grifter. I knew the people that support his claim, too. I wish Jeff nothing but the best. It takes a lot of courage to testify in front of congress and I applaud his efforts.
9
u/danielperi1 3d ago
Well, Elizondo had "evidence" too and testified in front of congress. Turned out it was a photo of an irrigation field...
35
u/colormotor 4d ago
Getting tired of these hearings being glorified podcasts
16
u/McQuibster 4d ago
No, this is her ON a podcast, retelling a third-hand story from ANOTHER podcast as part of the lead-up to having that story retold again at the hearing.
It's definitely newsworthy.
10
11
10
u/CorndogSurgeon 4d ago
15-20 seconds in she mentions "100s of calls into law enforcement".
I've scoured the web looking for any of those 911 calls. Anyone know how to dig those up? They may not be publicly available, fuck, I don't know. 🤷🏻♂️
8
u/McQuibster 4d ago
I know how to dig them up but you'd need to get to the source. And to do that you'd need to be a board certified proctologist.
6
11
48
u/Donga_Donga 4d ago
This is ridiculous. He isn't a witness. Someone told him this happened. Therefore it's hearsay, and useless.
7
u/Cheepak-Dopra 4d ago edited 4d ago
He claims to be a first hand eyewitness.He does not claim he saw the craft, only that he was involved in the response to the sightings. Edited.
15
u/DiogenesTheHound 4d ago
He literally does not. If you watched the video of him speaking about the event. He was called by somebody reporting it. He also claims he’s lost contact with the supposed eyewitnesses. So thats a secondhand account and the people that had the first hand account are conveniently nowhere to be found
1
u/Cheepak-Dopra 4d ago edited 4d ago
Jeffrey Nuccetelli claims to have seen it per this?He does not claim he saw the craft, only that he was involved in the response to the sightings. Edited above to reflect.
10
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.
-4
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, aarow_lol. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Be substantive.
This rule is an attempt to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI-generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance.
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts without supporting evidence.
- Short comments, and comments containing only emoji.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”) without some contextual observations.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.
-1
u/Pandamabear 4d ago
No, jeffery nuccetelli DID witness it himself, what are you talking about?
13
u/2basco 4d ago
No he didn’t, he was told about it, listen to his interview on Merged
4
u/Pandamabear 4d ago edited 4d ago
Wow, I completely misremembered it, my bad. That’s disappointing :/
Edit: I remembered why I got confused. If I recall correctly, he did see a UFO over his house after that incident, so he does have some firsthand experience at least.
-2
14
u/DiogenesTheHound 4d ago
“Naive to think we’re the only intelligence out there” yeah, but that doesn’t mean they’re flying around our atmosphere. This lady is talking out her ass.
2
u/Madphilosopher3 3d ago
Not only is it very likely that we’re not alone, but it’s also exceedingly unlikely that we’re the oldest and most advanced civilization in the universe. If there’s a much more advanced civilization out there, then we shouldn’t underestimate what they’re capable of and thus it wouldn’t be surprising to learn that they’re already here observing us.
2
u/Upstairs_Being290 3d ago
There's a distance/numbers issue regardless. If the "older civilization" is in any galaxy other than our own, then it becomes astronomically more difficult for it to ever reach us. And 99.999999999999% of existing stars are outside of the Milky Way. Even if it IS inside the Milky Way, our galaxy is 100,000 light years across and contains some 200,000,000,000 stars. How many millions of years would that civilization spend exploring closer stars before it reached us? Do civilizations even last that long?
I'm not saying it's impossible. But sob long as we're talking about "likelihood", it's quite likely that any advanced civ is too far away and never lasts long enough to reach us... at least not while we're in this particular time frame.
Also, take into account that there is zero evidence of any crashed probes/ships or other real evidence of any space-faring civilization having been here previously.
1
u/Madphilosopher3 2d ago
We have the Fermi paradox precisely because of the high likelihood of advanced civilizations though. Ironically enough however it’s not much of a paradox since the only real leads we have for potential ET technosignatures are on and around earth, not around some distant star. This isn’t surprising because even with conservative estimates, it would take only a tiny fraction of the age of the galaxy to fully explore it with self-replicating probes. It doesn’t require full colonization either for probes to reach us and observe us from a safe distance, even if the original creators are no longer around or even anywhere near us. Probes can easily accumulate and spread like a virus from many civilizations over cosmic timescales.
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 2d ago
For your theory to work, it has to assume that these probes are so ubiquitous that they're exploring the whole galaxy, yet so rare and stealthy that they never unambiguously reveal their presence.
That seems a rather unlikely needle to thread.
It also begs the question of whether any civilization would even want infinitely reproducing AI-controlled probes forever going out and communicating back to it. Brings up numerous issues of AI safety and Dark Forest worries both.
1
u/Madphilosopher3 2d ago
A much older and more advanced civilization is not only very likely to be capable of advanced stealth technology, but would also have significant incentive to use those capabilities as well. Not only for scientific research purposes of less advanced civilizations, but also to conduct reconnaissance for their own defense as well. Keeping an eye on any future potential threats that could develop is definitely in their best interest.
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 2d ago
If they had such stealth technology, then would they be keeping the lights on while they flew around at night?
1
u/Madphilosopher3 2d ago
The historical pattern of the phenomenon showing itself in a limited way suggests that they may want to slowly reveal their presence over time in a way that causes minimal societal disruption. Perhaps they’re letting us come to terms with the reality of their presence before initiating open contact. It would make sense given that they can’t hide from us forever. We will only get more advanced ourselves and will eventually spread into spaces they occupy.
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 2d ago
You're assuming your conclusion while cherry-picking evidence that supports your theory. How would buzzing around in the night as indeterminate lights accomplish "revealing their presence" in any manner, far or slow?
Supposedly they appeared in clear view to dozens of housewives with cameras in the 50s, the whole city of Phoenix in the 90s, but now pretend to be drones. Supposedly they were making crop circles, mutilating cows, and anally probing abductees in the 1970s, then suddenly quieted down, only to emerge decades later as ..... blinking lights?
Or, even better, they let the US government (and how many other governments?) have a dozen of their crafts, on the pinky-finger bet that none of those faulty, corrupt humans would give up the game? I mean, supposedly they crashed a rocket right there for the fucking FASCISTS to find back in 1930s, and just trusted the fascists so much that they knew they'd never reveal, but even while getting destroyed in war?
Nothing is being revealed, on any time scale, other than the fact that human beings are wildly imaginative.
10
u/ZigZagZedZod 4d ago
So "hundreds of people" reported it, and it was mentioned in "multiple [police] blotters," but how many witnesses have come forward to talk about a football field-size glowing red cube that appeared over a large Air Force Base where military and civilians live and work 24/7, including dependent spouses and children?
7
u/Redshirt2386 4d ago
My mom lives there and is obsessed with UFOs. I’ve never heard her mention this once.
26
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Shizix 4d ago
grifter gets thrown around a lot but I have yet to see a rich witness or experiencer, the only people making money off of this are documentary makers and book writers, even then they ain't rich. Call them liars, disinformation agents, or literally anything else unverified because you can verify who makes money off the subject (Short list). Pretty much every experiencer gets vilified and lose jobs and entire careers just mentioning this subject matter, you don't get paid to go on podcasts but the podcasters do from Ad revenue.
But yeah community is hot for teacher and this hearing isn't going to be anything special. Until program specialists/managers get subpoenaed don't expect much but more noise Or we actually get the UAPDA passed and start declassifying things so people under oath can actually talk publicly in a hearing without getting the standard "I can tell you in a SCIF but not in this public hearing"
14
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
13
u/josebolt 4d ago
When Tim Burchett started his disclosure shtick there were people in this sub telling others to donate to his campaign for his reelection. That should have been a bit of a red flag.
5
0
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, theJMAN1016. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 12: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
16
u/abdab336 4d ago
Yeah it’s not a financial grift but a political one. It’s a distraction. You know what from.
-4
u/Shizix 4d ago
eh it's a weak angle for distraction given how little this topic is discussed in main stream media, and how little the public cares but Luna doing Luna things is yeah, she likes attention is the more likely answer and using this to float her political career for sure but that doesn't discredit any information she uses to benefit herself.
15
u/abdab336 4d ago
She’s literally talking on the Joe Rogan podcast mate. C’mon.
3
u/Shizix 4d ago edited 4d ago
our president starting a war with Venezuela, now that's a distraction, this is childs play in comparison to what our government could cook up. A "distraction" only works if it takes up air time on prime news networks and the longer it takes up sound bites and causes discussions to be had the less time spent on your target for distraction...this made no noise.
1
u/ifnotthefool 3d ago
No matter how reasonable you are, they will forever move the goalpost in order to disregard any progress we are making. Take my updoots.
1
u/abdab336 3d ago
Yeah they call it the “firehouse of falsehood” for a reason. They throw so much at you, you can’t pay attention. It’s not a “drip drip”. It’s a torrent. War with Venezuela, troops in DC, aliens. Throw it all at them, and they can’t pay attention as you loot the country and get away with murder.
1
u/tweakingforjesus 3d ago
And the higher up military and civil servants can make far more in the defense contracting game than the ufo circuit.
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, theJMAN1016. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 12: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
0
-1
4d ago
[deleted]
5
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, theJMAN1016. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 13: Top-level, off-topic, political comments may be removed at moderator discretion. There are political aspects which are relevant to ufology, but we aim to keep the subreddit free of partisan politics and debate.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
28
u/G-M-Dark 4d ago edited 4d ago
They're not investigating this subject - they're burying it.
Civilian testimony has been sidelined since 2017, replaced by a curated stream of military-adjacent accounts that committees can't act on anyway.
Anecdotes are a dime a dozen, but without direct witnesses to Undisclosed Special Access Programs (USAPs) tied to technology retrieval and reverse engineering, all this is a PR stunt giving lip-service to the idea of genuine political engagement.
Real accountability starts with evidence from inside these programs - that’s where government accountability begins - not with unverifiable sightings, but with evidence tied directly to what previous administrations have buried and kept hidden.
There are a thousand men and women on this site alone, all with a very real story to tell, and it's treated as worthless in preference for yet more unverified stories coming from what we're constantly being sold as somehow more important, higher value witnesses.
Our situation here today is nobody's word is worth squat unless vouched for by someone with a media platform bringing them forward - and all those that are coming forward are doing is just telling stories no more credible, no more backed up evidence than anyone else's.
This isn't how anyone gets to the truth - this is how the fuckers buried it.
11
u/fun-with-fun 4d ago
They're not investigating this subject - they're burying it.
I don't get how talking about these things more than has been done in the decades previous is "burying it."
2
u/Windman772 4d ago
Because we are not progressing in the quality of witnesses. It was acceptable to have a few casual sighting witnesses that are not program insiders for the first hearing or two, just to get the public's feet wet, but we are now on our 4th or 5th hearing with the same low quality witnesses. Poor witnesses just make us a laughing stock at this point. We need real program insiders. If we can't have that, then we are not moving forward
7
u/DuckworthBuckington 4d ago
Even if all the stories are completely true and were taken seriously so what? If there’s no physical proof or even a photograph of the thing what’s expected to be done at that point? Add it to the collection of cool campfire stories. This entire “disclosure” pursuit is a complete waste of time. Sworn testimony or not there’s nothing anyone can do if the ufo isn’t even there anymore anyway.
I got a ghost story that totally happened with no proof. Let’s get congress involved.
3
u/devoduder 3d ago
Exactly, I was stationed at Malmstrom in the 90s and there were lots of stories about missile sites being built on native burial grounds and haunted. Tales of footprints in the snow leading up to a security fence and continuing on the other side of or stories of security forces vehicles shot with native arrows. No pictures of any of that.
I believe those tales as much as I do this incident or the 1967 Malmstrom incident.
2
u/silv3rbull8 4d ago
Let the NRO publish the data they used for the Sentient system to detect a UAP. Perhaps a public scientific analysis of the AI and ML algorithms used for that will also help in detecting these “ghosts”. Sounds like a plan
1
u/Windman772 4d ago
There are things we can do. We can make noise so congress will pass the UAPDA. That's the only way to get disclosure. That said, the crappy witnesses for this hearing will not accomplish that goal
1
u/stipulus 4d ago
People get prosecuted and sent to prison with just sworn testimony. This is very real and the pursuit is very helpful in creating public pressure to release more information.
17
u/toxicpositivity2025 4d ago
She lost me at “sober as a priest.” Seriously, move to disclose or subpoena and then go on Rogan with real data or just go home. Literally any of us could go on any show and tell a buddy’s sighting story like Luna. Rogan has become shill for the right’s airtime at this point. He has created an attention platform and now wastes it on tertiary sources, that’s a big change.
-2
3
8
u/GreatCaesarGhost 4d ago
So, a story from over 20 years ago, and I'm guessing no way to verify any details. And as we all know, stories never change over time.
6
8
8
u/livingthedream2060 4d ago
More nonsense from Republicans. They're in complete control of the govt, campaigned on true govt transparency and all we get is the same stories everyone else has been telling for years. Republicans are routinely ignoring the law with support from their voters, meaning whistleblowers can easily come out with Republicans ignoring any laws broken but yet, nothing has come out.
To me, this is nothing more than Republicans dangling a carrot in front of you all. They got your vote, but if you vote for them one more time, they'll 💯 expose the truth this time.
8
8
u/captaincook14 4d ago
This bitch is steady straight lying. Can’t take a thing she says seriously.
0
u/Moonbase-Interceptor 3d ago
Why should she lie? What would be the point?
3
u/Sad_Bus5498 3d ago
To distract from certain other things the government should be doing.
0
u/Moonbase-Interceptor 2d ago
Nonsense.
2
u/Sad_Bus5498 2d ago
You're factually and categorically wrong if you believe anything otherwise. This is all part of the biggest cover-up in history
1
u/Moonbase-Interceptor 2d ago
Right! It appears that I may have misunderstood you. I’m not denying that this is the biggest cover up in history. It most certainly is. However, I’m not yet willing to commit to what you appear to be saying. As for be me ’factually and categorically wrong’ about whether of not Luna is lying, you simply don’t know that with 100% certainty so why write that. You don’t know for certain and neither do I.
4
u/YoureVulnerableNow 4d ago
Good to note that despite her mentioning the witness' drawing, the image opposite her face is an unrelated and probably generated depiction with no special knowledge.
Someone linked a responder to to this incident getting interviewed on a podcast, in the sourced tweet. No mention of "a weird thing in the middle". Respondent mentions memory discrepancies, acknowledges they may be due to eyewitness fallibility. Claims a single document is all that survived a particularly destructive repairman fumble.
Red light is variously alleged by experiencers/contactees as IR out-of-band emission, a "weapons engaged" signal, any number of laser-based sensor/effectors, biological engagement systems, and even a sign of the machine code underlying everything.
Maybe it was just a dead pixel.
4
5
u/rarestakesando 4d ago
Sober as a priest? Aren’t they known for being huge Alcis?
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 3d ago
Low-key, my mom's priest was a recovering alcoholic. I never knew of him slipping up, but he talked about his struggle from the pulpit.
1
u/rarestakesando 2d ago
I mean it’s just a stereotype and not true for all priests of course I just never heard the term « sober as a priest » before seems like that would imply the opposite given the stereotype of the priest with flask and the monk with the keg etc…
11
5
u/little-miss-believer 4d ago
first of all, if she thinks “a Priest” is a reliable source for true information, that tells you everything you need to know about this lady… 🙄
5
3
u/Jonssith 4d ago
she's another victim of the psy-op. i've been on this sub for years on and off through all the drama and big "revelations". Nothing is new or groundbreaking it's endless teasing and nonsense to be frank. Years and years i swear it's an alien circle jerk with no end.
2
4
u/DuckworthBuckington 4d ago
Why anyone is invested in people just telling stories is beyond me anyway. Who cares whose testimony it is? I saw a giant hot dog shaped glowing craft exactly 200ft long and 200ft high at an exact coordinate position at an exact time down to the second. … OKAY???? Is it there now??? What investigation/ data collection can be done at this point? The entire thing is useless and basically a waste of time. It’s campfire stories. Doesn’t matter if it happened or not.
4
u/DisinfoAgentNo007 4d ago
Everything is the size of a football field in the US.
It seems like the go to thing to say when you want the scale of something to seem impressive.
2
u/Impossible_Habit2234 4d ago
Can we get someone who at least adjusted the ashtray in one of these uaps? Come on man.
2
u/GotchaPresident 4d ago
Eye witness testimony strikes again
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 3d ago
It's actually secondhand testimony, this guy who will be testifying has only heard stories about it. He had some of the affidavits written down, but he"lost" them.
2
u/GotchaPresident 2d ago
Lul sounds about right
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 2d ago
I'm not even joking - that's literally who is testifying.
Though it might not even be secondhand - it's now unclear whether he personally talked to the witnesses, or just heard about their stories from someine else.
2
2
u/MilkofGuthix 4d ago
The same Boeing who's whistleblowers repetedly off themselves? Yes let's trust them...
2
u/87LucasOliveira 4d ago edited 4d ago
"Whatever had appeared over the base was basically bigger than a football field.
A red cube with some wierd thing in the center of it."
Rep Anna Luna describes a giant red UFO witnessed by Boeing contractors at Vandenberg AFB in 2003
An Air Force veteran present for this event was just announced as a witness for the upcoming UFO Congressional Hearing
https://x.com/RedPandaKoala/status/1963268108497674544
Joe Rogan Experience # 2365 - Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-yPOBaYDOo
...
"The size of a football field, silently floating over the launchpad, red in color, glowing.” - USAF veteran Jeff Nuccetelli was just announced as a witness at the upcoming UFO hearing. Here he describes a giant red UFO witnessed by Boeing contractors at Vandenberg AFB in 2003.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1n7i5nh/the_size_of_a_football_field_silently_floating/
...
Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection
Subject: Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection
Date: September 9, 2025
Time: 10:00 am
Place: HVC-210
Witnesses and testimonies:
Jeffrey Nuccetelli
U.S. Air Force Veteran
Chief Alexandro Wiggins
UAP Witness
George Knapp
UAP Journalist
Dylan Borland
UAP Witness
U.S. Air Force Veteran
4
u/RedEyeJedi559 4d ago
In 2009 in Visalia, Ca at 1am, +20 people and I saw something similar to what she's talking about. The light was a bright orange red color and I couldn't tell what shape it was cause it was right over us. It so big and bright that I could barely see the night sky. It silently hovering above us for 20 seconds and then took off zig zagging north. After it was gone 2 jets appeared and followed in the same direction the ufo went but those jets had nothing on the speed of that ufo. Again it was easily bigger than a pro football stadium. I'm still in contact with one other person there that night and he hates talking about it.
1
u/Upstairs_Being290 3d ago
If you don't know how high it was, them how do you know how big it was?
1
u/RedEyeJedi559 2d ago
I could barely see the night sky around it when it was directly above me. It felt so big and I was in the middle of a strip mall parking lot. I was next to the Taco bell in Mary's Vineyard in Visalia, CA. The ufo came from the south and shot north.
It felt as big or bigger than the parking lot from my POV, maybe it was 200-300 feet but looking at the bottom it was all light, not a super bright like the sun but just orange reddish light like a ember makes in a fire. So it was hard to get a reference of distance. It was so silent and BIG.
2
1
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, LOLunlucky. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 13: Top-level, off-topic, political comments may be removed at moderator discretion. There are political aspects which are relevant to ufology, but we aim to keep the subreddit free of partisan politics and debate.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
u/xOrion12x 3d ago
I just watched the interview yesterday with the security officer. Insane sighting. 100% legit, too.
1
u/Ryukyo 3d ago
I'm pretty stoked for Tuesday, but I won't get my hopes up. The box will not be opened until they want it to be opened. This is more secret than a nuclear weapons facility. I've said this before many times, we gotta get some hard evidence and not just stories, especially " I heard from a guy I interviewed" story. We gotta get some real photos from inside where they store these things.
1
u/Late-Yoghurt15 3d ago
while what I say is my thoughts personally everyone needs to make their own decision ultimately.
what is the reason or lets say justification that this platform goes around in circles with theories or another claimed sighting?
in 1989 b Lazar exposed what he believed as evidence of alien technology as we know it. he made claims and it was interesting given the circumstances of his entire situation.
since the Internet became alive, all this nonsense followed. claims of sightings, abductions, ability to summon a ufo. I find this nothing more or less than absurd. what ever the reason is whether it may be to gain attention to ones self (even believing a lie of their own), mal information, fake automated comments. who knows.
I am certain there is something that majority of people in our existence are not ready to know about. I suggest everyone here continue their lives in the best way possible. sitting on here day after day listening to all these different new ideologies that emerge will never change anything.
1
1
1
1
1
1
3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, Sad_Bus5498. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 13: Top-level, off-topic, political comments may be removed at moderator discretion. There are political aspects which are relevant to ufology, but we aim to keep the subreddit free of partisan politics and debate.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
u/Sad_Bus5498 3d ago
I've seen a UFO once. I was about 9 or 10 years old, me, my uncle and my dad were driving back to tacoma Washington from out past Roy Washington, about an hour and a half drive, when we were coming through by the military base, we notice a giant green light shine through the window from overhead, then move forward, as it's moving the color of the lights are changing and the size and shape of the UFO was actively altering. It went from circular, to arrowhead shape, then to what I would call around the shape of a rubber chicken, then it immediately disappeared into a tracer like line of light going upwards like it was leaving the atmosphere at what I would call lightspeed or activating a warp drive. I will always remember the second the light comes into view we immediately pulled over and got out and saw this all transpire.
1
u/YeaTired 2d ago
Anything to distract Americans from the billionaires stealing a representative government
1
u/EmoogOdin 2d ago
I thought this thing was much more like a flat (almost) 2d square and not at all a cube…?
1
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 2d ago
Hi, Majestic-Parsley4927. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 2: No discussion unrelated to Unidentified Flying Objects. This includes:
- Proselytization
- Artwork not related to a UFO sighting
- Adjacent topics without an explicit connection to UFOs
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
-1
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.
1
1
1
0
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Follow the Standards of Civility:
No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc... No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement. You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.
0
u/freesoloc2c 4d ago
Airbases are covered in cameras. Let's see the footage. I'm so tired of Trust me Bro.
0
u/Brilliant-Royal578 4d ago
In 1986/87 it was near dusk. Sat down in fold out laying chair looked up and a darker ship (it was very close to blending in with sky. Was the size of a city block went past maybe a couple thousand feet off the ground. A red light flashed across it. Before I could spit out look it was gone. I looked around to see if anyone else saw it and one of my buddies looked at me puzzled. I said nothing to him he said nothing to me. We didn’t wanna sound like nut jobs. 23 years later I see him at class reunion. I said to him hey did you see and he stopped me mid sentence and said yes giant ship red light only saw for couple seconds. or
0
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Hi, GringoSwann. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults/personal attacks/claims of mental illness
- No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc...
- No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
- You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
0
-1
u/silv3rbull8 4d ago
Why are so many new accounts suddenly engaging on this ? Is it the upcoming hearing
-3
-3
u/Ok-Tree-1898 4d ago
We need all the help we can get if we want full disclosure. I'm on board with second-hand reports of this magnitude. It was not a probe. At that size, it had occupants. Short of hacking pentagon file room she is presently our best chance.
6
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/UFOs-ModTeam 3d ago
Be substantive.
This rule is an attempt to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI-generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance.
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts without supporting evidence.
- Short comments, and comments containing only emoji.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”) without some contextual observations.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.
-2
3
u/DiCeStrikEd 4d ago
How can you assume advanced life does not have Giga drones? That do the recon work for them while they hide behind a moon around Saturn
We have drones in the Middle East operated by dudes in a metal box in Nevada desert ..
And drones on Mars .. now add a few thousand years
0
u/Ok-Tree-1898 4d ago
I would consider robots as an occupant. Why would you need a craft that big if only surveys
0
u/DiCeStrikEd 4d ago
One angle .. Military wise? - a show of force
“Hey this is our drones look at the size of it - you wouldn’t like to see our combat ships?
1
2
u/DuckworthBuckington 4d ago
Full disclosure to you is what then? The government co-signing stories told by what basically to them amounts to random people? How does that do a damn thing? Let’s everyone tell our best campfire stories so we can finally get some disclosure in here!
It’s useless and changes absolutely nothing. If there’s no physical trace and not so much as a single blurry photograph then I’m really struggling to understand what good a spooky story is at that point. Waste of time to even pursue it.
0
u/Ok-Tree-1898 4d ago
I would be looking for confirmation from a base official that, yes this did occur.
2
u/DuckworthBuckington 4d ago
So disclosure to you is what amounts to a random person co-signing a spooky story. Again, useless and provides absolutely nothing.
0
u/Ok-Tree-1898 4d ago
We have to start somewhere causing cracks in the armor of tight-lipped officials. A few Generals might di the trick.
-6
u/Low_town_tall_order 4d ago
All the bots in here crying about trump, its all so predictable and tired.
-1
u/AltruisticBall42 3d ago
Ok let's have this gentleman and all the Boeing contractors get in front of an open hearing and tell us what they saw that would corroborate what he claims. Strength in numbers.
-7
-2
u/Onpoint050 4d ago
Way too recent. They only like to focus on accounts from the early 2000s. But hey, we might get info on the red cube in another 20 yrs
•
u/StatementBot 4d ago
The following submission statement was provided by /u/87LucasOliveira:
"Whatever had appeared over the base was basically bigger than a football field.
A red cube with some wierd thing in the center of it."
Rep Anna Luna describes a giant red UFO witnessed by Boeing contractors at Vandenberg AFB in 2003
An Air Force veteran present for this event was just announced as a witness for the upcoming UFO Congressional Hearing
https://x.com/RedPandaKoala/status/1963268108497674544
Joe Rogan Experience # 2365 - Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-yPOBaYDOo
...
"The size of a football field, silently floating over the launchpad, red in color, glowing.” - USAF veteran Jeff Nuccetelli was just announced as a witness at the upcoming UFO hearing. Here he describes a giant red UFO witnessed by Boeing contractors at Vandenberg AFB in 2003.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1n7i5nh/the_size_of_a_football_field_silently_floating/
...
Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection
Subject: Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection
Date: September 9, 2025
Time: 10:00 am
Place: HVC-210
Witnesses and testimonies:
Jeffrey Nuccetelli
U.S. Air Force Veteran
Chief Alexandro Wiggins
UAP Witness
George Knapp
UAP Journalist
Dylan Borland
UAP Witness
U.S. Air Force Veteran
https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/restoring-public-trust-through-uap-transparency-and-whistleblower-protection/
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1n96808/whatever_had_appeared_over_the_base_was_basically/nck4syw/