84
60
u/PresidentSkillz Deutschland 4d ago
I mean, the average R*zzian general is capturing tree lines and villages for twice the casualties, so it's kind of an achievement. Like how passing with a D- is good when everyone else got an F
30
u/WhatsRatingsPrecious Uncultured 4d ago
Zhukov was a fucking strategic madman.
That said, he had ridiculously overwhelming numbers bristling with literal tons of armaments and materiel through Lend/Lease, going after an exhausted adversary that was on its last legs.
24
u/ilpazzo12 Trentino-Südtirol 4d ago
He did do great feats before all of that too though. He was in charge of some things with Barbarossa too, I think defending Moscow. But even before that, at Khakhin Gol he kicked the Japanese so hard they stopped thinking about war with the USSR whatsoever. Oh and after the initial winter war mess I think Stalin put him in charge to fix the mess, and it worked.
4
u/esuil 4d ago
Of course it is a success. The more casualties and the longer, the better. After all, you setup line of trusted subordinates all the way down to steal few months of salary of each dead soldier while delaying the reports of their deaths.
Soldier dies -> your subordinate takes over financials and siphons the salary to crypto
Few months pass -> you report the death and move on to next set of casualties
Repeat for few months, stove the crypto away, retire, emerge as multi-millionaire few years later.
There is insane level of corruption on both sides right now. Neither side feels they can achieve any meaningful objectives and front has stalled, so corrupt fucks of both sides are in full on money making phase right now. Russians by skimming the salaries, Ukrainians by creating forced mobilization schemes of "pay us a bribe or go to the front". This war is fucked.
The towns are eventually captured as unintended consequence of throwing stuff at them while officers are busy making money, not as a direct result of meaningful tactics.
3
u/1Katasav1 România 4d ago
This is just what warfare has evolved into since WW1. Not to be on Russia's side, but you're not going to see anything different from Ukraine, or any country for that matter.
3
2
u/Kinexity Yuropean - Polish 4d ago
The problem that OP is overlooking here is that if the cost doesn't matter to Russia then it's their win because they took the city. It doesn't matter how many soldiers or armaments Russia loses if it doesn't bring Ukraine any closer to taking stolen lands back.
1
u/Divniy 1d ago
Losing armaments totally do have impact on bringing Ukraine closer to taking stolen lands back. Stalemate is only possible when both countries are able to continue the fight. Once one country would give in, the borders would change drastically really fast.
War costs something. Losing soldiers and equipment costs something. The longer it goes, more problems accumulate. Support Ukraine so it is able to stand. Sanction russia more so it won't be able to afford to continue. It will give results in the end.
1
1
u/KernunQc7 4d ago
What are 30k men's sanity or even lives, compared to the career/survival of a r*ssian general? History tells us: nothing.
515
u/Gruffleson Norge/Noreg 4d ago
The most annoying thing with that movie, is they didn't pick an actor with a wide enough chest to sport all the medals Zhukov actually had, in full size.