r/antimeme 29d ago

❌ Anti-Hate ❌ They agree about this.

Post image
21.9k Upvotes

698 comments sorted by

View all comments

734

u/CitroHimselph 29d ago edited 26d ago

Everyone deserves some respect. Though they have to be held accountable for their actions as well.

20

u/Elder_Chimera 29d ago edited 27d ago

work pie sort ad hoc cobweb fine badge lavish spotted escape

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

7

u/CitroHimselph 29d ago

That's right. Fortunately that's not what the post is about.

5

u/[deleted] 28d ago edited 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago

A popular talking point is that white cis-het men have historically been doing much better than any other group, which, by some people's views, makes it perfectly fine to hate on them. That's the point of the original meme, that "feminists hate men". Why I chose to add the accountability part is because men, although deserve the same respect and rights as everyone else, are factually more privileged than other groups, thus have to take on more responsibility for their actions if they want to be treated as actual equals. Is this more understandable?

2

u/Elder_Chimera 28d ago edited 27d ago

treatment unwritten cooperative numerous birds busy skirt childlike innate toy

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago

I hold no such beliefs. Equity isn't the same as equality. White people are more privileged than others. Men are more privileged than others in our culture. Or do you not see it this way?

1

u/Elder_Chimera 28d ago edited 15d ago

absorbed capable middle kiss birds hospital practice provide touch squeal

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

3

u/Miserable_Hippo_5325 28d ago

"have to take MORE responsibility for their action if they want to be treated as equals" it didn't take long for the misandry to come out

0

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago edited 28d ago

Stating the fact that men are more privileged than any other group isn't misandry...

Imagine you're in school. If you have more apples than all your classmates combined, and I give everyone exactly one apple, that's equality, but not fair, because you still have much more than others. If I look at who has more and who has less, and give an extra apple to those who have the least, but make sure to give at least one to everyone, THAT'S fair. Nobody's losing apples, everyone is better off than before, but the people at the bottom are getting extra help to lessen the gaps between those with more and those with less.

Get it now?

1

u/Miserable_Hippo_5325 28d ago

Don't change the narrative now, you literally said that they have to take more responsibility because otherwise you wont consider them as equals 

1

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago

Could you quote me there, please? Because I believe I did not say that.

1

u/Miserable_Hippo_5325 28d ago

I already did in my previous reply which you conveniently ignored

1

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago

So you don't know what the word "quote" means. Cool.

1

u/Miserable_Hippo_5325 28d ago

It's even between quotation marks you just don't want to talk about it seems and would rather get personal

1

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago

I'm gonna rephrase my previous comment because this is getting cringe. Quote the part where I said what you said that I said.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/lemons7472 28d ago edited 28d ago

This is group logic of assuming every man has privilege and power, and have all done the same exact actions as each other, and if they don’t subscribe to your assumptions that all of them must take accountability for what YOU are accusing all men of, despite you knowing nothing of most men’s life, that they can’t be treated equally.

Whatever actions you accuse men as a whole of that they have to take responsibility for, doesn’t even apply to men as a whole, since it’s a generlization.

You remove the individuality of men, by claiming them all to be largely privileged, disregarding of other men’s life situations or issues being born less fortunate, regardless of their race (not being white in a western country), regardless of how poor they may or may not be, regardless of the fact that many men legit have no “privlage” beyond working a 9 to 5, etc.

Why do we need to make it about how they are all privlaged, in the topic of respecting men as human beings? Many believe that women have privlage, even if other women may not agree, but that doesn’t mean they don’t desvere equality or respect.

Like the other comment said, this was about respecting men as a human beings and their issues. Not about how men as a hive mind must take accountability according to you, not how they are all privlaged and must admit it if they want to be treated with baseline human respect.

You took it to that place yourself. It’s like a redpiller reacting to the message of “women are humans and deserve respect” by calling all all women privileged and that they don’t deserve equality or humans rights, less they agree with that Red Piller.

Hence why it’s strange you did not leave this topic at just respecting men as people and individuals, which now we know why.

1

u/CitroHimselph 28d ago

Yes, my comment is generalizing, I didn't say that every single man has more power and privilege than every single person from other groups. Nor did I say that respect towards men depends on if they take "enough accountability" or not. I said what I said, I even tried to clarify it. You chose to misunderstand what I said and added some bullshit assumptions to be mad at a strawman.

Equity. That's what I'm talking about. Actual fairness. Look it up.

0

u/lemons7472 28d ago edited 28d ago

It was you made the assumption and generalization (therefore all) that men are specifically more privileged (not taking in any other factor other than the fact that they are male therefore must be privlaged), and made this is it a whole thing of accountability rather than respect or equality. You single out and generalize a certain sex solely for a lecture on a post about about male issues.