LEGO is an association of the words "leg" and "godt", which directly translates to the words "play" and "well". Therefore, it is LEGO and not Legos as is often referred.
Sure, but a deliberate misspelling doesn't change the intention. It was, as you said, just for trademark purposes. The word still has an obvious origin that doesn't align with how we commonly use it today, especially since it isn't pronounced out loud any differently.
I don't understand your point. It's a reference, sure, but they are homophones. They are two different words with two different spellings meanings. One is a proper noun describing a company (sometimes used as an adjective), the other is a noun describing a number (isn't an adjective).
That's like saying nothing's gonna stop you from using the wrong they're/their/there because in speech they sound the same, but if you wrote it down everyone would know you used the wrong one or don't know how to spell.
43
u/VagaBond_rfC Jul 30 '24
LEGO is an association of the words "leg" and "godt", which directly translates to the words "play" and "well". Therefore, it is LEGO and not Legos as is often referred.
Have a great day! 🇩🇰