r/dataisbeautiful 19h ago

OC [OC] 14 days of unbelievable mental and physical rollercoaster captured in one graph

Post image

I tracked my body composition before a 7-day water fast, right after, and then after 7 days of refeeding.

  • Total weight dropped from 162.1 → 150.4 lbs, then came back up to 157.2 lbs.
  • Fat mass went down 21.4 → 16.8 lbs, then only partially returned (17.3 lbs).
  • Lean tissue dipped during the fast but mostly came back after refeed.
  • Bone mass stayed stable.

One picture shows just how extreme - and fascinating - the changes were 😊

0 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

82

u/GfxJG 18h ago

That... Doesn't sound healthy in the slightest. But you do you bud.

57

u/Sir_smokes_a_lot OC: 1 18h ago

also data is not beautiful

-3

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[deleted]

9

u/talashrrg 18h ago

Which studies?

-29

u/LubeTornado 18h ago

You know you can quickly Google these things right?

23

u/tokillaworm 18h ago

You know it’s typically expected that when someone cites studies, they actually provide the reference right?

Especially so in a sub dedicated to data. 

-13

u/LubeTornado 18h ago

You know if they haven't a quick Google is seconds away all the same

1

u/li7lex 18h ago

Typical response of someone who makes his data up. There's a reason the burden of proof is on the one that makes the claim.

1

u/LubeTornado 17h ago

In an official and professional setting absolutely. This is Reddit and instead of looking up the information...a bunch of time's been wasted and noone following this pointless chain got ahead.

Never change

Koo, M., & Kim, Y. (2025). The bystander effect of information: Waiting for others to Google a topic decreases the likelihood of understanding it. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 45-60.

11

u/TotallyNormalSquid 18h ago

If a person makes a bold claim and already knows the sources themselves, it's much more efficient for them to link the studies than to expect every reader to go and search for them independently. Although I guess you'd probably get a more balanced view from going to hunt them down yourself - expect an awful lot of studies contradict the idea that not eating for 7 days is healthy.

1

u/Both-Reason6023 18h ago

Not water fast but a protein sparing rapid fast loss diet is fine for max of 4-6 weeks (for average person; super obese individuals can follow it for longer).

-4

u/BusyWorkinPete 18h ago

Fasting is one of the healthiest things you can do for your body.

-11

u/andtitov 18h ago

I’ve been fasting quite a bit, so nothing unexpected here. This is typical for a 7-day fast 😊

17

u/takethemoment13 18h ago

If you don't mind me asking, why do you fast? You don't seem to be overweight. Have you discussed this with your doctor?

I don't mean to be invasive, I just want to make sure you're safe.

1

u/SentientCheeseCake 18h ago

I'm not the OP but there are many reasons to fast. It is great for gut health, stimulates growth hormone release, can be good for the skin and many other things I can't think of. It's tough to do, and if your only goal is weight loss there are other easier methods. (End of the day it's all about caloric deficit)

I don't usually fast much, and have never done any more than 3 days. But I always feel really good after it. Usually once a week I'll do a 36 hour fast and that seems to be quite doable and helps with my health. I think there are many issues people have that basically come down to overeating or eating too often.

1

u/Professional-Gear88 9h ago

Mice that follow calorie restricted diets live 50% longer. I have theories as to the biochemical underpinnings to that that are out of scope here. But I’ll just say it makes sense. I think the best way to combat aging may actually a reasonable level of fasting.

I also believe being in a continually fed state (“eat 5 small meals a day”) or just modern eating leads to metabolic syndrome.

u/HappyBear_btc 2h ago

sorry for the out of context question, but what does your profile pic means? I just see it all over reddit...

-2

u/andtitov 18h ago

Fasting has a ton of benefits, but most people only talk about weight loss. I fast to lower inflammation, improve blood sugar regulation, stimulate autophagy, boost HGH, increase BDNF, and for many other reasons.

6

u/blubblu 18h ago

I believe you can achieve many of those benefits from simply intermittent fasting

2

u/magneticB 18h ago

Most of those benefits start after 36-40 hours so you won’t get them from skipping breakfast

2

u/bathmaster69 18h ago

I think you're right - but I'm willing to bet the person that does 7 day fasts is already well aware of that. You have the opportunity to talk to someone that has a lot of experience fasting - might as well ask them questions about it instead of trying to teach them about it

1

u/blubblu 17h ago

Wasn’t trying to teach anyone anything - was confirming my understanding and furthering a portion of a conversation.

Never once did I try and teach anyone about anything sir. 

1

u/bathmaster69 17h ago

Got it okay

1

u/Electronic-Win4954 15h ago

The way you phrased it did not seem like you were trying to further the discussion obviously

4

u/rhesusMonkeyBoy 18h ago

Fat ended at ~81%

Bone mass ~99%

Lean tissue ~99%

Interesting

13

u/sirprimal11 18h ago

What do you suspect led to gaining 6.3 pounds of lean tissue in 7 days?

32

u/aroc91 18h ago edited 18h ago

Imagination, mainly. These scans are notoriously inaccurate. 

Edit: it can be accounted for with glycogen and associated water loss, not actual catabolism/anabolism.

9

u/SatanIsMyUsername 18h ago

My guess is just reabsorption of glycogen and carbs back into the muscle tissue.

4

u/andtitov 18h ago

It's typical bounce back - the body gets back water, glycogen and gut microbiome.

3

u/sirprimal11 18h ago

Oh, I didn’t figure that water would be considered lean tissue. I think more high end measurements consider water mass separately from lean tissue mass.

1

u/Stavinator 18h ago

It's easier to understand if you consider he recovered 6.3 pounds of lean tissue instead of gaining. The body has memory and can quickly come back to a previous state.

Also, as others pointed out, the way he used to measure lean mass is not 100% accurate and may be affected by his other macro indicators.

1

u/aroc91 18h ago

Even calling it "recovering" lean body mass is a bit strange. The tissue wasn't catabolized. It's mainly glycogen and 3x the glycogen mass in associated water.

2

u/Stavinator 17h ago

I am not an expert here, but from what I understand the number of muscle cells does not increase or decrease, but their size and strength change with exercise and food.

So from my understanding, the muscle cells atrophied a bit during the fast but recovered quickly.

1

u/andtitov 15h ago

Yes, you’re almost right - one of the benefits of extended fasting is apoptosis, where senescent or ‘zombie’ cells are eliminated. That can include a small reduction in muscle cells as well.

1

u/andtitov 15h ago

Yeah, and on the top of that - gut microbiome. It shrinks during fasts and regains its weight (to the original 2-3 kgs) and diversity during the refeeding time.

29

u/margmi 18h ago edited 18h ago

0% chance that was actually a change in lean tissue and not just glycogen. Whatever you used to measure it wasn’t accurate.

I’d believe the loss, but not the gain, which means the loss was not lean mass either.

1

u/tokillaworm 18h ago

The average adult stores less than a kilo of glycogen. 

1

u/andtitov 15h ago

Yep, that’s right - total glycogen is usually under 1 kg (about 400–500 g in muscle and 80–100 g in the liver). What’s interesting is each gram of glycogen is stored with about 3-4 g of water, so when those stores deplete you also drop several pounds of water weight. That’s why in the first couple days of fasting or keto, the quick weight loss is mostly glycogen + water.

1

u/bathmaster69 18h ago

Out of curiosity - why are you so confidently asserting that?

2

u/margmi 18h ago

It’s not possible to gain 6lbs of lean mass in a week. Our bodies just don’t work that way.

1

u/bathmaster69 17h ago

I see thanks

1

u/andtitov 15h ago

Not exactly. Lean tissue isn’t just muscle - it also includes water, glycogen, and even the gut microbiome. During refeeding, you don’t see true muscle growth right away, but water, glycogen, and microbiome mass come back quickly. That’s why lean tissue rebounds so fast.

1

u/andtitov 15h ago

Not exactly. Lean tissue isn’t just muscle - it also includes water, glycogen, and even the gut microbiome. During refeeding, you don’t see true muscle growth right away, but water, glycogen, and microbiome mass come back quickly. That’s why lean tissue rebounds so fast.

2

u/andtitov 18h ago

I used Dexa scan, which is considered the gold standard in measuring body composition. Lean tissue includes, besides muscles and glycogen, water and gut microbiome. So, during the fast, water, glycogen and gut microbiome goes down, and bounce back during the refeeding period. It's a typical graph for a 7-day water fast.

6

u/Both-Reason6023 18h ago

Dexa has precision (coefficient of variation) for bone mineral density measurements at 3% and fat and lean tissue at 2%. For those reasons it’s highly recommended to not take it more frequently than once every 3-6 months. It’s just not precise enough.

1

u/andtitov 15h ago

True - DEXA’s CV is about 2% for fat/lean and about 3% for bone, so small changes can just be noise. But the error is random, not systematic, so bigger shifts (like several lbs) are real. For clinical tracking, 3-6 months makes sense, but for self-experiments you can still get useful directional insights if you keep the error margin in mind.

1

u/Both-Reason6023 15h ago

I’m just saying that it’s probable that your post refeed results for lean mass are off significantly and you lost major amount of muscle, which you could have prevented by at least consuming ~240 g of protein isolate with water (2.4-3.2g of protein per kg of desired body weight during rapid weight loss).

It’d take 10 days instead of 7 to lose the same amount of weight but protect you from losing months worth of muscle training.

For me that’s an obvious choice.

7

u/heliosh 18h ago

How did you measure the proportions?

1

u/andtitov 18h ago

Using Dexa scan

3

u/amakai 18h ago

Not enough data points, you should do a 30-day water fast now for science! /s