r/environment 1d ago

Britain's running out of water - so why aren't we collecting rain, like Germany?

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/water-shortage-collecting-rain-germany-3874327
276 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

47

u/kon--- 1d ago

How it is when legislators fuss over all the wrong things, sell the nation off, cede to fear, and have no eye for the future whatsoever.

24

u/turbo_dude 1d ago

 I liked the idea I read about the other day that  suggested water companies pay fines, in the form of company shares, to the government (rather than cash). 

20

u/kon--- 1d ago

Vital resources have no business being owned. Fully flip'n wild that a critical element to the being alive is allowed to be owned and/or sold for profit.

3

u/turbo_dude 1d ago

the idea of nationalisation spooks the markets and right now with the state of Britain's economy and finances, that's the last thing you want. This would be a sneaky way of slowly renationalising it.

1

u/ElegantBiscuit 1d ago

I wouldn't say there was anything slow or sneaky about what they were saying, but more so that the physical economic attributes of what are typically defined as public goods will lead to wildly inefficient societal outcomes when privately owned. The same logic that applies to a privately owned militaries also applies in varying degrees to electricity, water, healthcare, education, air and water quality, emergency services, transit, parks, etc. Arguably it should also extend to internet, housing, and many more.

There is nothing economically harmful about public services, and nordic countries with some of the highest GDP per capita and robust social services proves this. What it would do is rebalance the current stock market away from the companies who are extracting and concentrating wealth into their market capitalizations, into people's quality of life which would eventually flow back to national productivity and output figures.

30

u/theipaper 1d ago

“Save water – bath with a friend”: this has to be the most risqué public information advice ever broadcast by the government, but it certainly caught the mood at the height of the 1976 drought. Within days it was on badges and plastered across T-shirts. It might even have saved some water.

As drought conditions intensify across the UK, following the hottest spring on record, and with much of England under a hosepipe ban which is set to continue into autumn, it is time to think again about how we might save water.

It might seem strange that, on an island renowned for its drizzle, we should find ourselves hit once again by water shortages, but this should not really come as a surprise on a planet where global heating is running amok. Six of the hottest years on record in the UK have occurred in the last 10, while three of the hottest summers happened in the last five years. Greater heat drives increased evaporation, and a hotter atmosphere can hold more water vapour, and suck up surface water more rapidly. This can result in so-called flash droughts that can build in a matter of weeks.

Looking ahead, the picture looks pretty grim. Already the South East is designated as suffering from “severe water stress”, and another seven regions could follow as soon as 2030. By mid-century, the prospect of severe drought conditions resulting in water supply to households being cut-off for an extended period is a real one.

Plans for nine new reservoirs – the first for more than 30 years – were recently announced by the Government, but is this really the answer? After decades of gross underinvestment, the privatised water industry is rubbing its hands with glee, because reservoirs appear as assets on their books, and therefore increase the value of the companies. Whether these reservoirs end up being built or not, continuing to ensure that everyone has enough water is going to be a huge challenge in the decades ahead as the heat continues to build. We need to look at other ways of tackling the problem.

Water consumption per head in the UK is amongst the highest in Europe, while at the same time the equivalent of more than 1,200 Olympic-sized swimming pools of water is lost through leaks every day. Clearly, there is a huge amount of slack to be taken up before spending billions on new reservoirs. There is also plenty we can do ourselves, both to cut usage, and to provide us with some peace of mind if and when the supply is cut off.

15

u/theipaper 1d ago

When it comes to saving water Britain is far behind Europe, where both heat and drought have been building more rapidly in recent years. One of the solutions being embraced here, to handle water shortages, is what is called rainwater harvesting. Germany is ahead of the field at the moment, with almost two million homes having facilities to intercept and store rainwater. This is then used mainly for outdoor washing tasks, so that reliance on a centralised drinking water supply is reduced by the equivalent of around 50,000 Olympic swimming pools every year.

At the same time, there is the added bonus that less water flowing into storm drains during downpours also acts to reduce the risk of flooding. This has not all happened by accident, but is a consequence of tax breaks and subsidies from the German government, and it’s an approach being followed by other European countries too, including Belgium, France and Switzerland.

It makes sense in the UK too, where winter rainfall – which is actually increasing – can be stored for the hotter months, alongside intercepted thundery downpours that are already a common feature of our summers. Given that something like 13,000 gallons of rain falls on the average UK roof every year – more than one third of the average water usage for a four-person household – it seems daft not to intercept it.

Buying a harvesting system that links seamlessly with a mains supply is expensive, but purchasing the kit for linking gutters to water butts is cheap and easy to install. With almost an acre of land, on which we grow more than 30 varieties of fruit and veg, rainwater harvesting is absolutely essential for us. But it actually makes sense for everyone. The intercepted rainfall can be used for watering the garden – which plants prefer anyway – cleaning the car along with patios and driveways, washings windows and floors and, if you wish, flushing the loo.

When you think about it, using drinking water for all these activities seems more than a little bit bonkers. Drinking rainwater, even after it has been boiled, is not safe, due to contaminants picked up in the atmosphere and while stored, but you can buy filtering systems that make it potable.

Rainwater harvesting is worthwhile because it provides some degree of self-sufficiency, but the key takeaway here is that if millions of households harvest rainwater and use it for as many tasks as possible, then demand for increasingly precious mains drinking water can be massively reduced, allowing it to go further and cutting the chances of stand-pipes in the street during future droughts that are only going to get worse.

10

u/theipaper 1d ago

In the UK, some local councils and water utilities provide grants or rebates to cover part of the cost of installing rainwater harvesting equipment, and businesses may qualify for help with the cost of installation in the form of tax credits. At the moment, however, there is no national rainwater management strategy, little available public information on the subject, and no serious incentives for households or businesses to intercept and reuse rain. This has to change.

Before water users are forced to cough up billions in higher bills to pay for new reservoirs, the government must incentivise rainwater harvesting at a level that drives a big take-up. At the same time, it needs to force water companies to do far more to prevent the leaks that mean colossal volumes of water are lost every year. Not to do this makes no sense at all.

As long as we keep pumping out carbon dioxide, our climate – both in the UK and across the world – is going to get hotter, and water is going to become ever more scarce. Future droughts, driven by 40°C-plus heatwaves, will make this summer and that of 1976 seem cool and damp in comparison. Severe water shortages are now inevitable, and if we don’t get our act together now, in order to make the most of the water that falls out of the skies, we are going to be in deep trouble.

Measures we take today will bear fruit in the decades ahead. If we do nothing, then we will all eventually have to resign ourselves to hours queuing in the street for water. Meanwhile, bathing with a friend is definitely out, but I am sure a quick shared shower would be absolutely fine.

Bill McGuire is professor emeritus of geophysical and climate hazards at UCL. His next book – ‘The Fate of the World: a Deep-time History of the Climate Crisis’ – is out next year.

0

u/bagpussnz9 1d ago

Why just for watering the garden?. We have 60000 litter tank for drinking water harvested from the rain... Wouldn't what's it on the garden. That has it's own tank

18

u/CommercialStyle1647 1d ago

Didn't you guys privatise your water in the UK? Maybe you should start there.

19

u/PandaRot 1d ago

The vast majority of our problems come from privatisation.

3

u/glytxh 1d ago

Cant sell shares in personal water collection

9

u/zutpetje 1d ago

You won’t run out of water if you ditch factory farming. Most fresh water is used for cattle feed and cattle. Eat your veggies.

2

u/britannicker 1d ago

I think it's not collected because the UK, traditionally speaking, never lacked water... it always rained, it even rained on my summer holiday there.

Water butts / buckets are cheap, and iirc you just need to intercept the downpipe from the gutter (dead sure there's kits for that in every diy store).

I'd bet the last few years will change the general view, and you'll soon start to see house & garden owners setting up rain catching systems.

1

u/variablestonkflip 1d ago

Maybe the water companies should do more about their product, invest in the countries water collection and storage, or would that be too damaging to shareholder value?

-2

u/Warlock_Three 1d ago

Shouldn’t we be investing in desalination?

11

u/Jackass_cooper 1d ago

Desalination is very expensive and energy intense, which also isn't great for carbon output, and why bother when we get so much rainfall.

1

u/Tomby_93 1d ago

This is 100% true in terms of energy/carbon but there are serious plans in the East of England for one, maybe two desalination plants because of the serious deficit in supply.