r/europe • u/SeriouslyNotSerious2 Italy • 5d ago
Map Chat Control Stance as of Aug. 2025 (Countries)
5.2k
u/KN_Knoxxius 5d ago
Wait it was us Danes that proposed it? Fuck.
1.1k
u/Halvdjaevel 5d ago
At least this latest version of it, not sure about previous attempts.
795
u/KN_Knoxxius 5d ago
Well that's embarrassing. If it helps, nobody outside of our politicians actually think it's a good idea!
→ More replies (24)1.2k
u/UISystemError 5d ago edited 5d ago
That’s because the politicians themselves are exempt from it, as far as I understand it, because it is a security threat.
The majority of citizens object to it.
Use the website to voice your opposition https://fightchatcontrol.eu/
It will pre-compile an email for you, with the addresses of the representatives in your territory, and simply opens your default email app with everything done. You just click send. Takes like 3/4 clicks.
Props to the creator. They couldn’t have made it easier for you to object. Everyone should be doing this and spreading the same message.
Notice: If you are discussing this, and you make it to top comment, please copy and paste this to raise awareness of how simple it is to object.
118
u/DmMeYourBoobs69 5d ago
I did use this website to send an email, I have been completely ignored
147
u/UISystemError 5d ago
It’s the effort that counts. You can’t deny something is hugely unpopular if you’re inbox is flooded with thousands of complaints.
54
u/Aldnoah_Tharsis 4d ago
You can just claim its a bot campaign. That's the issue. They did the last time something adjacent to it got tried, even with in person protests, saying "they're all bought".
37
u/princess_raven 4d ago
"They're bought."
"The comments are bots."
"They're paid protesters."
"They're not educated enough to understand the issues."
"If you've nothing to hide, why worry?"
19
→ More replies (11)23
u/FluffyGreenThing 4d ago
I just did it and received autogenerated answers from 3 saying that the European Parliament is in recess until september 3rd so perhaps you’ll receive an answer later?
42
→ More replies (20)24
u/DucklockHolmes Sweden 5d ago
To clarify, as I've understood the proposal, politicians aren't exempt from it, rather it's workplace related communications that are exempt both for companies and politicians internally on say Teams.
→ More replies (6)47
u/xrogaan Belgium 5d ago
Neat article written 30 years ago on why privacy is important: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/crypto/cypherpunks/zimmermann-why-pgp.html
If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy.
→ More replies (3)152
u/raxiam Skåne 5d ago
→ More replies (1)141
u/oddsnstats 5d ago
Putting the 'scan' in Scandinavia.
And I thought these were the cool countries. Why are social democrats even pushing for this?
109
u/ThrowFar_Far_Away Sweden 5d ago
It quite aligns with our culture of "government knows best" so I'm not that surprised.
24
49
u/Kryddersild Denmark 5d ago
Well in Denmark (And I believe Sweden as well), back in the 30's, they did also front run for eugenics. I guess they really like control and hate individualism.
32
14
u/BrushNo8178 4d ago
Forced sterilisation was abolished in Sweden in 1976. The last experiments on intellectually disabled were done in 1955.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)6
u/__shobber__ 4d ago
All my dane friends absolutely hate danish society, because it's like a crab bucket. If you're somehow stand out, they would hate you.
→ More replies (1)47
u/almarcTheSun Armenia 5d ago
Norway and Denmark have been core members of the nine eyes since forever. Scandinavia has always been a hellhole when it comes to privacy.
→ More replies (2)12
u/faen_du_sa 4d ago
Not sure if I would agree its been a hellhole for privacy, but I would agree we put a tad too much good faith in our government. From a Norwegian aspect at least.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)6
→ More replies (4)5
u/Human-Astronomer6830 5d ago
They brought it back to the table as they got the rolling presidency.
So far, as I can tell, the Danes themselves didn't alter the policy draft but ofc, are behind pushing it.
114
u/arcane_labor92 5d ago
And pushing hard for it.
78
u/interesseret 5d ago
Yeah, its extremely rare that i experience being ashamed of my country, but here we are.
Every single politician we have pushing for this is a piece of shit.
→ More replies (3)18
85
22
207
u/KnightFlorianGeyer North Holland (Netherlands) 5d ago
I genuinely have no idea what Denmark is doing as EU presidency holder right now. First they try to completely remove the veto, which luckily failed, and now they introduce this stupid chat control stuff. Really unexpected for an otherwise reasonable country
→ More replies (40)89
u/IWillDevourYourToes Czech Republic 5d ago
And people thought Hungarian presidency will be the pain in the arse
→ More replies (1)48
u/KnightFlorianGeyer North Holland (Netherlands) 5d ago
Right, they even got Romania and Bulgaria into Schengen lol
7
→ More replies (85)44
1.6k
u/Sea-Temporary-6995 5d ago
I can't understand what goes through the head of people that support it.
I wrote to most of my country's representatives in the EU parliament but so far no reply.
655
u/tiankai 5d ago
fOr the KiDs
335
u/Every-Win-7892 Lower Saxony (Germany) 5d ago
More like fuck over the kids.
Who undermines freedom for security will lose both.
29
u/SmallTalnk 4d ago
Exactly, we must protect the liberal values on which the EU is built. Freedom is the most important value of modern liberal democracies.
It's crazy how illiberal movements are on the rise these days, from the ethno-nationalist right to the repressive left...
This decade it seems that everyone wants to suppress freedoms, while in the 2000s-2010s, it seemed that everyone was liberal.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)6
105
u/userNotFound82 Berlin (Germany) 5d ago
It‘s always „for“ the kids or „against“ terrorism or „against“ the drugs. Choose your fighter to install authoritarian tools…
36
u/slimvim 4d ago
If you oppose it, you're a pedo. That's how they get away with this kind of bullshit.
24
u/Incorrigible_Gaymer Eastern Poland 4d ago
And yet they make themselves exempt... Like if they were afraid of something.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)6
u/happy_church_burner 4d ago
It's really disheartening to see those either not understand or care that every door created for the police is a door created for everyone else also.
254
u/AmbitiousReaction168 5d ago
I’ve seen quite a few comments on Reddit claiming that, as long as we have nothing to hide, we shouldn’t worry. These commenters genuinely believe that the goal is to stop criminals and protect children.
198
90
u/Krebota The Netherlands 5d ago
If you break end-to-end encryption, you break privacy. The whole point of end-to-end encryption is that it is completely private. If they force companies to supply a backdoor, that's gone. That's why it is a problem.
You'd be naive to think that companies will not use the then available data of private chats to make a profit.
→ More replies (10)9
u/AmbitiousReaction168 5d ago
Yes I know. I most definitely do not condone the comments I was referring to.
→ More replies (18)8
u/enjdusan 4d ago
I always ask these people whether they would be OK with a camera in their bedroom... you know, you have nothing to hide, right?
→ More replies (1)57
u/amugsz Europe 5d ago
I e-mailed most of mine too, one of them said that chat control has "no concerns with privacy" and that it is an imperative bill for combating CSAM even if I linked a study stating government control does not affect much if anything on its spread.
They take us for idiots.
→ More replies (9)13
u/faen_du_sa 4d ago
Maybe not for idiots, but they for sure believe there wont be enough people who actively oppose it, and im not sure if they are wrong.
→ More replies (30)11
u/xondk Denmark 5d ago
Either lack of understanding of what they are suggestion, and or they gain something by doing it.
It has been suggested many times by more then one commission and most of them seem to be the lack of understanding, they base it on "Well the police and force their way into your house, so why not your messages?"
2.3k
u/GlobalFriendship5855 5d ago
You know it's bad when even Orban and Fico apparently support it.
1.4k
u/stillaras Greece 5d ago
EU is becoming so anti privacy lately. Complete opposite direction of what they have been doing the last few years. Very annoying
809
274
u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) 5d ago
And scary when you think about it.
At an age of USA, China and Russia spying everyone, the EU should be a shining beacon of that very thing not happening to its citizens.
→ More replies (3)122
u/Dovahkiinthesardine 4d ago
It will also give Russia a fucking backdoor. The politicians pushing for this are either stupid af or enemies of their people and should be treated accordingly.
29
u/HiCookieJack Europe 4d ago
every fucking 2 years we need to take it to the streets - just place the people proposing this BS going against our core values in jail
→ More replies (1)12
u/qwertzu-1 Hungary 4d ago
Fun fact: All of their names in the proposal are blacked out. The law itself explicitly exempts them. They know what they are doing.
38
u/GolotasDisciple Ireland 4d ago
EU is becoming so anti privacy lately.
EU is not a federation so it depends on its members. And yeah, I’d say countries like Ireland, France, and Germany are not really keen on internet freedom. It will always be up and down.
Well To be fair Ireland has no original thought, we just usually copy whatever UK does. Which is awful because UK is a terrible example.
What always annoyed me is how much power Germany and France have over these kinds of movements. Which is weird, because Germans as citizens are generally chill, but their government is really strict about everything. Probably the only country out there that actively hunts “piracy.”
Luckily for me, all of the things the EU wants to appropriate are downright stupid and easily avoidable if you’re IT literate. But for the general population, it’s insane that they’re fine with more surveillance and less personal privacy.
The way you change the EU is by changing your own country first. But honestly, we are not going in the right direction. European nations are already bureaucratic nightmares, and the EU is not making it any easier by adding more regulations that don’t improve quality of life but add even more strain on bureaucracy and essential services.
Spying on people takes a good amount of manpower, and that could be used for something else.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)44
u/Detvan_SK 5d ago
EU was never about privacy, they was again leaking data to companies and outside of EU, but are fine with it if state know everything about you.
306
u/TheSecondTraitor Slovakia 5d ago
Being able to read private messages of his critics, journalists, police, detectives, prosecutors, judges etc is Fico's wet dream. He already sees himself abusing the shit out of this to increase his chances of staying in power or at least out of prison.
→ More replies (1)90
u/Incorrigible_Gaymer Eastern Poland 5d ago
Not just Fico. It's every wannabe authoritarian ruling party's wet dream. Digging up dirt on opposition becomes a breeze.
→ More replies (6)51
u/Morasain 5d ago
Interestingly, all the representatives from AfD (far right German party) oppose it according to the website.
Seems that they're at least honest about being anti EU involvement lol.
→ More replies (1)35
u/TangerineSorry8463 4d ago
AfD is like Europe's biggest "what if the group chat leaks"
→ More replies (2)18
u/Dragoner7 Hungary 5d ago edited 5d ago
The Chat Control website has bad data for Hungary. I don’t think there has been any official communication from this from Orban. They state that he would support this (and based on his moronic laws, sure, but even then, I could see hid voters not liking it or him being cautious about this, maybe even opposing this, framing it as ‘Brussels wanting to take away your privacy’), but good luck pushing this when there is an election coming. It also lists clearly opposition parties such as TISZA, DK as also in support based on the government’s unconfirmed standpoint, but the moment Orban would try pushing for this, all TISZA party members would argue for the opposite. Magyar Peter only ignores controversial issues as to not to divide his supporters before election, but I don think protecting privacy would be that controversial.
So option a is: Orban doesn’t want to risk it, uses this as an advantage to gain favor of voters by opposing it Option B: Orban for some reason supporting this openly, all TISZA party members openly opposing this.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (12)66
u/Flamin_Jesus 5d ago
That just means there's bribery involved, not exactly a huge surprise.
51
u/Legion404 5d ago
Not bribery, with this law they likely can spy more easily on opposition/hostile elements.
→ More replies (1)11
u/FirstAtEridu Styria (Austria) 5d ago
Politicians are exempt form Chat control, it's just for us peasants.
807
u/Lisbon- 5d ago
I don’t know a single citizen who wants this. How can countries be aligned with this bs
415
u/Better_than_GOT_S8 Czech Republic 5d ago
Most people have no idea this is a thing, or they are brainwashed by people saying that this will only be used to catch child predators.
→ More replies (2)65
12
u/BiereGoogles 4d ago
My dad and a recent girlfriend approves of it. Both with the classical argument "i HaVe NoThInG tO hIdE"... and it makes my blood boil!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (23)5
u/henk12310 Fryslân (Netherlands) 4d ago
Because this is not in the news at all. I have only seen this mentioned on Reddit and YouTube, which is kinda insane for such an impactful and influential proposal
135
u/NachMitternacht 5d ago
so what sense will this actually make?
now that everyone knows it and even without the goverment proposing this, people would just move off platform and do their shady stuff anyway...
this only looks like its against the regular citizen at this point and just some goverments being outlasted even more because of so many false positives, let alone how those false positives can be used to exploit regular citizens and ruin democracy.
137
u/Wooden-Practice8508 Intr-o țară ca asta sufli ca intr-o lumânare 5d ago
Politicians, police will be exempt, it's just another power grab
→ More replies (1)24
u/NachMitternacht 5d ago
i wish i could say this is some conspiracy but the last few years have proven this statement to be true. unfortunately ...
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)32
u/AntLive9218 5d ago
That's the whole point. It isn't a coincidence that this is being pushed when more and more citizens are unhappy with the governments, and they may cast a "dangerous" vote after another 4 years of no representation, or worse, organize a protests.
This isn't about the crimes people care about like thieves / robbers on the streets the locals already recognize for being around in specific areas, or groomers even a blind man could find, but the police would rather visit the people writing "mean" posts online about such gangs.
It's about the "crime" of threatening the comfortable positions and corrupt investments of the career politicians representing their "donors" instead of their citizens.
1.5k
u/Downtown-Sell5949 5d ago edited 5d ago
How is Germany even undecided? They don't even have normal functioning street view because of "muh privacy" and doing everything in cash because "The government won't need to know what I get" but then also undecided on the most privacy invasive law ever.
EDIT: Be sure to send an email to your MEP's via: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/
382
u/Fothyon Germany 5d ago
Because this isn't about the popular vote, there isn't going to be a referendum about it, this map just shows what they know or guess the German MEP are going to vote
146
u/Downtown-Sell5949 5d ago
If even AfD opposes this law (according to https://fightchatcontrol.eu/) then there's something wrong with the other parties. That does sound bad.
211
u/Banane9 Lower Saxony (Germany) 5d ago
AfD opposes it because they basically oppose everything... Sadly in this case, they're accidentally on the good side with that.
45
u/SunflowerMoonwalk Europe 🏳️⚧️ 5d ago
Similar in the UK. Reform are the only party to oppose our draconian new "online safety act". There seems to be a complete lack of liberal/left opposition across Europe to massive privacy violations which is honestly absurd.
→ More replies (14)89
→ More replies (5)25
u/V112 Lower Silesia (Poland) 5d ago
It’s not MEP based. Its government stance - this shows the probable votes in the Council of the EU (the upper chamber, where the EP is the lower chamber). MEPs vote mostly based on their europarty alignment, not their government position.
11
u/Fothyon Germany 5d ago
No, it doesn't, or rather, it shows both. On the website it shows which way each MEP is supposed to vote for, considering either if their Party already announced they will vote a certain way (AfD, Volt, Greens) or if they're still thinking about it in the Government (SPD, CDU)
→ More replies (1)7
u/V112 Lower Silesia (Poland) 5d ago
Well then it’s stupid. Because meps don’t reprint the government and in many cases they are of national opposition parties to their government. Poland has 53 MEPs, assuming all of them will vote oppose - which the website does - based on the stance of the government is outright ridiculous, considering how critical of the government are about half of those MEPs
→ More replies (3)42
u/dasBunnyFL Vorarlberg (Austria) 5d ago
The German government was against previous versions of this. However the new government has yet to officially comment and might have a different position than previous ones.
→ More replies (2)20
u/Downtown-Sell5949 5d ago
Quite a few countries were against this, in I think 2020, that are now supporting it. So that doesn't say anything.
→ More replies (1)67
u/cyrkielNT Poland 5d ago
Recording your car trip is illegal because of privacy concerns, but goverment want to spy on citizens chats
40
→ More replies (1)18
u/Smitellos 5d ago
Or having cookies automatically recorded is illegal too, with a new proposal that the cookie window should only have 1 click option to reject all.
→ More replies (2)50
u/Rebatsune 5d ago
Street view is now available for Germany tho…
18
u/Max_FI Finland 5d ago
But unlike other countries, there is no historical Street View, so the old images will be deleted when new ones are added.
8
u/TheNazzarow 4d ago
Oh yeah you're right. That's quite sad - germany had coverage in like 15 cities from 15 years ago and I know I looked at that a year ago but know its gone. It was a fun time capsule.
8
u/The-Kylo-Ren 5d ago
And they’ve adopted card pretty much everywhere since COVID.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (16)4
u/GagolTheSheep 5d ago
Undecided, in this case, means that there hasn't been any formal statements from the government about this.
Basically just means the German government hasn't officially announced how they will be voting (possibly because they haven't decided yet)
744
u/BothExamination6580 5d ago
Fuck those Denmark politicians
253
u/will_dormer Denmark 5d ago edited 5d ago
peter hummelgaard
He had a tough childhood, beaten, and now he want to save other children, no matter what.. I hate him
232
u/Fruloops Slovenia 5d ago
"save the children" is a disgrace of a fucking excuse and it's used only because the people pushing it are well aware that a lot of people will not look past the facade and will support it regardless of anything because "kids".
→ More replies (1)56
→ More replies (6)9
u/libach81 Europe 4d ago
On the same note, there is Nick Hækkerup who claims that surveillance equals freedom. More precisely, he said that you cannot have freedom without security (as in the sense of feeling secure) and that it logically then follows that more surveillance gives more freedom.
→ More replies (10)23
u/Potato_Poul Bornholm. Why is this the only danish place with a flair? 5d ago
All danes i know don't it so thanks for saying politicians
73
200
u/Little_Albatross9304 5d ago
I don't understand why this isn't a public vote. It's extremely invasive for everyone's privacy.
→ More replies (1)120
378
u/SeriouslyNotSerious2 Italy 5d ago
→ More replies (8)49
u/Dotcaprachiappa Italy 5d ago
Why does it say that some countries (Denmark, Malta, ...) support it when most of the MEPs oppose?
→ More replies (3)114
u/SeriouslyNotSerious2 Italy 5d ago
Because the governments of these countries are pushing the proposal in the Council, but it's not a given that the individual MEPs sitting in the parliament will comply with their domestic governments agendas.
People blame the EU, but the EU is not doing anything here. It's every government of every country that supports this pushing this to make it EU wide.
→ More replies (2)17
u/Dotcaprachiappa Italy 5d ago
So those countries support it in the council but oppose it in parliament?
43
u/SeriouslyNotSerious2 Italy 5d ago
Yes some MEPs, especially Denmark seem to be more inclined to oppose it when/if it reaches the parliament even though Denmark as a nation is pushing for this in the Council.
→ More replies (2)8
u/Swarna_Keanu 4d ago
MEPs are elected independently of the national government. So it's possible those value different policies.
242
u/TheTiniestPeach 5d ago
Never thought I am gonna see privacy and rights ripped away from people under the excuse of protecting the children..
79
u/Little_Albatross9304 5d ago
They did the same, using terrorism as their excuse.
→ More replies (2)30
u/Smitellos 5d ago
Oh I saw it twice. With Russia and China.
In Russia it was also about "protecting children" in 2015
7
u/Akhevan Russia 4d ago
In Russia it was also about "protecting children" in 2015
And in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and now slated for 2026 too.
And it mostly started with persecution against free journalism in the early to mid 00s really. And 2015 was a year after Crimea so your schedule is way off.
28
10
u/2024-2025 5d ago
They don’t give a shit about the children, it’s just an excuse to make it harder for opponents to oppose it.
7
u/glassfrogger Hungary 4d ago
Same excuse Orbán is using to oppress gay rights in Hungary.
This is Russian recipe. It seems to be working everywhere.
→ More replies (7)8
337
u/stonkysdotcom 5d ago
What a fucking shame my native Sweden is supporting this travesty
189
u/SeriouslyNotSerious2 Italy 5d ago
Sweden particularly seems obsessed with monitoring everything about their citizens tbh so I'm not surprised at all
111
u/stonkysdotcom 5d ago
Sweden had strong digital privacy laws that have been eroded over the last decade. It wasn't always like this
40
u/SeriouslyNotSerious2 Italy 5d ago
But things like Ratsit are crazy af
47
u/stonkysdotcom 5d ago
There are much more egregious things going on in Sweden, such as the police opening mail(legally) in case they suspect some weed in there.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)15
u/oskich Sweden 5d ago
Most data held by the government institutions is public (for transparency, anti-corruption), but some private companies have used that law to package it and sell it as a service. Before those companies came around you had to call or write a government employee and request a printout.
→ More replies (3)8
5
u/BrushNo8178 4d ago
Justice minister Tomas Bodström pushed for mass surveillance already 20 years ago (Bodströmssamhället).
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)9
162
u/DuaLipaMePippa 5d ago
We Croats have a remarkable ability to always choose wrong.
50
u/RecordApprehensive17 5d ago
Don't imagine that we French are better
→ More replies (2)42
u/Big-Machine9625 Czech Republic 5d ago
Tbh I'm honestly shocked that all of the MEPs for Czechia actually agreed on something uninanimously. You know the idea is horrible if liberals, hyper-conservatives, communists, and capitalists are all trying to shoot it down.
I can't see why some countries support it though, since it can't be just to protect children.
→ More replies (2)10
11
u/Legal_Lettuce6233 5d ago
SDP i MOST su počeli gurati peticije koje se protive ovome; hvala bogu isusu i dalaj lami da SDP napokon ima neki stav.
Sad samo trebaju borzanicu i ostale stisnut i valjda će bit nešto.
8
u/wildpantz Croatia 5d ago
We chose wrong and then our choice chose wrong, but you summed it up pretty well, yeah.
→ More replies (3)5
86
41
u/krzyk Poland 5d ago
Oh, there is finally something nice about my country. Our MEPs oppose this.
→ More replies (1)
39
u/Enderfan7363 Hesse (Germany) 5d ago
A quick reminder that this whole "movement", if you can even call it that, is incredibly inorganic with millions and millions in lobby money behind it. Now where does that money come from?
→ More replies (1)
111
u/Wippingwaffel South Holland (Netherlands) 5d ago
If this was a popular vote it wouldn't even get considered. We need to remember this law won't affect those voting for it.
12
5d ago
We need to remember this law won't affect those voting for it.
This probably is to sweeten the deal for those politicians, but I am very curious if this applies to them only when elected/in office or during an extended period. You'd have to be a madman, stupid or corrupt to agree to something like this for only 4 years.
→ More replies (1)
71
u/Expert_Average958 Lower Saxony (Germany) 5d ago
Fucking Germany being undecided. Can we not have a correct stance on something? Anything? Just for once? FFS!
19
→ More replies (3)12
u/TimDd2013 4d ago
I wrote them an email like 2 or 3 weeks ago, and after about 50 immediate responses about summer break, I've received a total of 3 replies so far. In order: (we vote...) no(Tierschutzpartei), no(AfD), no(FDP).
So at least the parties that kinda need to fight for votes seem to care a bit.
7
u/Expert_Average958 Lower Saxony (Germany) 4d ago
Thank you for emailing them, I'm disappointed that Piratenpartei did not reply going to talk to them the next time i see their booth.
73
32
u/icemixxy 5d ago
wow. they want to scan my messages but i can't use a dashcam in my car? damn these peopel are really on a fuckall roll the last 10 years
53
u/regenpower Bavaria (Germany) 5d ago
sent 40 emails to the german representatives yesterday, will do the remaining 35 tomorrow (all those still undecided, 75/96)
the left and the right both are against it, and i have gotten one response so far from a CDU member that they are also against it; maybe not all hope is lost in germany
5
u/MeggaMortY 4d ago
Thank you for doing your part. As a somewhat green resident with plenty of German knowledge, but not so much political chops, do you have some sort of way to tell me how to contact them too?
→ More replies (2)
49
u/Flashpoint_1985 5d ago
Next step: live access to phone cameras
Greetings from Poland
→ More replies (1)9
19
u/Minute_Attempt3063 4d ago
If this passes, I will just give all my chats to the Chinese government.
Maybe they have a better use for it at that point.
Like, if this passes this violates one of the core fucking values of Europe. Privacy. And they are fucking that up now as well.
Child safety? Anti terrorism? Bullshit. Child safety is easy if you just banned American apps. Want to prevent bullying? Geach the fucking bully manners.
→ More replies (1)
68
u/Tsukeh Sweden 5d ago
As a Swede I'm so fucking mad at my own government, and somehow even more mad at Denmark. Smfh
44
→ More replies (2)11
u/probablypoo 4d ago
The only Swedish parties that supports Chat control on EU-level is Socialdemokraterna and Kristdemokraterna, the rest are against.
→ More replies (3)
19
28
u/sliddis 5d ago
Other than "fighting child pornography" what are any arguments for this? Are there any known suggestions how this will be implemented on a technical level? Backdooring all apps in EU app stores? Force social media Giants to share information?
I don't know any details more than I skimmed on Reddit. But it truly sounds really stupid that so many countries are for it. I can't comprehend they neglect all privacy concerns. There must be more to this?
→ More replies (10)
29
12
u/trueosiris2 5d ago
the Party of the Belgian prime minister just came out strongly against chat control. This means that it's as good as sure that Belgium will vote against it.
68
41
27
23
u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) 5d ago
Poland is usually very good at internet rights. Today is no different here.
24
10
32
11
u/ChrisBreederveld 4d ago
It's so weird to me that everyone in tech knows if you open the door to the "good guys" you also open it to the bad guys.
This is exactly that, with added steps. So it does not only invade our privacy, it also invades our security, even at government level.
→ More replies (1)
28
22
18
u/KPhoenix83 United States of America 5d ago
After reading about the law a bit, it seems that this law has more to do with governmental control than actually protecting children.
I suspect its real intentions are far more broad, especially given that this will weaken end to end encryption in Europe and allow governments to potentially look into ALL types of data (seems kind of dumb as that could make you guys vulnerable to foreign interference or spying also).
But I am American, and I am overly paranoid about anything my government does as we are raised to be, especially our current one. So maybe I am reading too much into it.
→ More replies (3)12
u/TenpoSuno The Netherlands 4d ago
We're all getting the same vibe learning about this initiative. It smells too much like a power grab onder the guise of "protecting the kids". A back door is, by definition, a security vulnerability. Given the current geo-political climate, this is a terrible idea. And imho always a terrible idea.
9
8
u/JustDadIt 4d ago
As an EU resident can I not just use my right to be forgotten, or the new DMA requirement and move my data to a different spy agency in the middle of the ocean, or file a GDPR complaint about improperly storing my information without permission???
16
u/Sonnycrocketto Norway 5d ago edited 4d ago
Eastern and central Europe are going to save us?
→ More replies (1)
6
u/-Vikthor- Czechia 5d ago
What I don't get is the position of the Baltic states. Subverting encryption opens security holes the size of a T-90. Should it be enacted it WILL be exploited by ruskys.
6
u/SS_wypipo 4d ago
Can't help but notice the overlap between countries who support this and countries in which life is slowly but surely getting worse in most aspects. This might be just me though.
6
u/supercakefish United Kingdom 4d ago
As a Brit I say save yourselves EU, while you still can! Our government has already lost the plot, accusing anyone who doesn’t like the new Online Safety Act of being paedophile supporters - yes you did read that correctly, sadly. It’s too late for us, we lost this fight. Don’t follow in our footsteps!
7
u/joyfulpuff 4d ago
I don't want to be treated like a criminal, even tho i am a lawful citizen.
Before my chats are being monitored, I want to see every politician's income, open cards on donations to political parties and it's members, as well as the right to vote for or against restrictions of my own f*cking privacy.
Otherwise, this is literally China-stuff.
11
u/boilingfrogsinpants Canada 5d ago
If anybody tries to take a stance of "protecting the children" to get any sort of legislation passed, you can almost guarantee that it has nothing to do with protecting children...
5
5
u/PozitronCZ Czech Republic 5d ago
The question isn't if it gets approved anymore, the question only is when it gets approved.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/xxSammaelxx 4d ago
All right, let's go for it. But then let's also make sure no politician is exempted from these controls, and that if there's the even the smallest suspicion of any corrupt behavior, those chats are checked with the same scrutiny as for the rest of us.
Looking at you specifically, Portugal and Spain whose leaders have been getting away with the most blatant corruption ever.
4
u/OrdinaryMundane1579 4d ago
"🇫🇷 France
81 representatives
81 presumed in favor based on government stance"
So we don't fucking know then ?
→ More replies (2)
13
10
1.3k
u/DrWhoDC Belgium 5d ago
I believe yesterday our prime minister (Belgium) declared we’ll oppose.