Really depends on if you want them to not know what it really was or if you do want them to know what it really was but don't want them to see the reaction.
To not know if it was a double trick or not. Some of us expected the puzzle pieces, and if it didn't show it then we wouldn't know if it was the puzzles pieces or the device and wouldn't get our satisfaction (unless we found the full video of course).
I’ve been on this sub a long time, I’ve never heard someone describe that as the goal.
I just don’t understand your perspective. If it cut earlier, we wouldn’t see the puzzle, so you wouldn’t even know it ended too soon. It would appear to end too early, or be a pointless video. It cutting “too soon” is us being unable to see her reaction.
If it cut any earlier or later, it wouldn’t fit this sub anymore.
Probably because you simply never seen people having to explain this sub to difficult people like yourself, or having to explain at all. How would you describe it?
I’d describe it as videos that end right before the main moment of action. Most videos that are uploaded to this channel fit that description, and not yours.
Sorry you found my question difficult. Feel free to not reply and let someone else explain instead, I’d rather have a neutral discussion instead of one with someone who’s clearly annoyed.
Some of us expected the puzzle pieces, and if it didn't show it then we wouldn't know if it was the puzzles pieces or the device
Search "satisfaction" on this sub and also look at the comments on most of the videos when they don't get to find out what happens.
Cutting the video slightly earlier would have denied viewers seeing two things instead of just one, if it was puzzle pieces or the device and her reaction, so would have been a double denial.
Not sure how many different ways I can say some of us were expecting puzzle pieces and cutting that off would have denied the satisfaction of knowing for sure.
4
u/Dioxybenzone 2d ago
How is that too late…?