r/gtaonline Feb 20 '25

FINALLY WE’RE GETTING IT

Post image
9.2k Upvotes

850 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

120

u/DryCalligrapher8696 Feb 20 '25

Red Dead would get a PAID DLC before GTA. Alas, R* abandoned it after RDO couldn’t meet the requirements for those micro-transaction profits.

49

u/Poisonpython5719 0 Private dances 0 Sex acts purchased Feb 20 '25

I can only take goooold for that DLC. Do ya have some?

15

u/thatissomeBS Feb 20 '25

They screwed up so bad with two separate currencies on Red Dead Online. It's a lot easier to spend a few bucks here and there if it goes into the same bank as everything else, that you can also use to buy everything in the game. That's why people are willing to spend so much on GTA:O, because that cash can buy everything.

11

u/Vallkyrie Feb 20 '25

I also found it a lot easier to afford everything in RDO compared to GTA, at least as someone who mostly plays alone. There was no incentive to buy currency there when I got every business and clothing item quite fast. In GTA I could see it being more tempting with new toys costing tens of millions.

2

u/thatissomeBS Feb 20 '25

On the flip side, with the amount of GTA:O I played, and often with a friend group, I have never paid for GTA cash. Right now I have $50mm cash and everything I want to own (including 100+ cars, all the houses I can, and every business I've cared to buy) on my primary PS5 account that's been active since the PS3.

Of course, my friendless PC account has some of the more basic stuff (office, nightclub, bunker, MC, Kosatka) and about $6mm in cash. I don't spend as much time on that account.

1

u/Mr_Zoovaska Feb 21 '25

Tbf in the early years of GTAO there wasn't much expensive stuff to buy either. Even the best cars and properties were less than a million, with a few extravagant exceptions. Granted earning money back then was a slower and more monotonous but still. Nowadays they would never release a new car for under a mil, including the most basic shitboxes. But presumably they still sold a lot of shark cards back then, otherwise it probably wouldn't still be getting updates over 10 years later.

1

u/DryCalligrapher8696 Mar 06 '25

That is a valid point. however if it wasn’t for shark cards, we would’ve gotten GTA6 on a decent timeline. Probably would’ve been out a year ago if it wasn’t for a shark cards🤣 as there business model wouldn’t be driven behind micro transactions, but the release & production of new games/content.

6

u/MarsupialMadness Feb 21 '25

The MTX horse-shit still bothers me. Like...It perfectly displays just how devoid of any discernible intelligence the suits at R* and T2 actually are.

Like RDR2 and RDO made fucking bank. 8th best selling game of all time.

And they still ditched it. Strauss Zelnick and his shareholder buddies all need tarred and feathered.

3

u/DryCalligrapher8696 Feb 21 '25

The amount of money that any paid DLC for a single player would make is beyond ridiculous. The fact that they’re willing to ditch such art and story making for micro transactions just defines who is in control of the private company. The VC’s effectively pushed the creatives out

Their scope is now on GTA6 micro transactions as it will launch on DAY 1 of the game being out unlike every other rockstar game that has had online play.

My main worry is the single player story will suffer in GTA6 as online will always be a 💩 show. We’ll see what happens.

2

u/PutridSauce Feb 20 '25

Ill never forgive them for what they did to RDO