r/physicsmemes 5d ago

😍

[deleted]

1.7k Upvotes

46 comments sorted by

138

u/No_Championship5105 5d ago

I would shed tears

185

u/BRNitalldown Psychics Degree 5d ago

29

u/EnolaNek 5d ago

Blessed be Griffiths, mercy of grad students and salvation of undergrads, tome of truth and wellspring of all wisdom, able to teach the wise and the humble alike, amen.

7

u/Drneroflame 4d ago

Man quantum mechanics was hard but Griffiths made it so much more enjoyable

67

u/Away-Experience6890 5d ago

Content is great. Some of those end of chapter problems tho ... I still have ptsd from those integrals.

22

u/simpsonstimetravel 4d ago

I get that a physicist is supposed to know how to integrate difficult shit, but i always just get to the integral, check if its the right one and move on.

13

u/Away-Experience6890 4d ago

It's weird because its more of a rite of passage for undergrad. In research, its mostly just symbolic integration to generate differential forms, but then these integrals are mostly just solved computationally.

22

u/yaichnayaSkorlupka 5d ago

GRIIIITHIIIFFF!!

11

u/dover_oxide 5d ago

That book still haunts my dreams and I've been out of college for more than a decade.

40

u/yukiohana 5d ago

I see a potential template πŸ‘

5

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Gidelix 5d ago

Who hurt you

18

u/LowBudgetRalsei 5d ago

It's a nice book :3 im reading it rn, im at the wave guides portion

6

u/SetGold902 5d ago

Seeing this 20 min before my electromagnetic fields test

7

u/Excellent-World-6100 4d ago

How'd you do

6

u/SetGold902 4d ago

I think pretty well

5

u/Kruse002 3d ago

To be honest, I actually would like this as a gift.

4

u/Cozwei 5d ago

I got this on my birthday

3

u/MHPolymath 4d ago

Honestly, I would love it πŸ˜‚

3

u/brrraaaiiins 4d ago

And instead of a lump of coal, there’s Jackson.

3

u/Van_Healsing 4d ago

Honestly this was such a good textbook I should by my own personal copy

3

u/EconomicSeahorse Student 3d ago

I bought a copy for my E&M classes (I prefer using physical paper books) and just kept it afterwards haha. It is currently sitting on a shelf at home (next to the quantum mechanics and elementary particle physics books)

2

u/vindictive-etcher 5d ago

I would sock them in the mouth

2

u/ADownStrabgeQuark 5d ago

Should I do the version by Griffiths, Freedmon or Taylor?

2

u/Star_Wyvern 4d ago

Griffiths

2

u/WanderingWrackspurt 3d ago

fr, im only reading the part about vectors rn but its literally better than my classπŸ”₯

3

u/Dimitrygol 5d ago

What's your favorite chapter? Mine's chapter 6 so far

12

u/Beif_ 5d ago

Do you people memorize the chapters of your textbooks?

9

u/Dimitrygol 4d ago

For griffiths you do

6

u/LostSalt24 5d ago

7’s definitely a fun one, but also pretty tough

4

u/EconomicSeahorse Student 5d ago

Mine is chapter 12, though that's just me being a sucker for things that are relativistic, but like the way Maxwell's equations come together in four vector/tensorial notation is beautiful

3

u/DiscoPotato69 4d ago

Here is a better Electrodynamics book. Brought tears of joy to my eyes.

2

u/LostSalt24 5d ago

Oh my god, literally me 2 weeks ago

1

u/Grates_ 4d ago

Walser?

1

u/xovista_star4395 4d ago

[Cry]

2

u/brrraaaiiins 4d ago

No, that’s Jackson

1

u/Star_Wyvern 4d ago

Correct. Griffiths is a god damn saint. An Oracle. Jackson is the Devil and speaks in tongues.

1

u/herohans99 4d ago

At least it isn't Halliday and Resnick, Vol. 2

1

u/gsurfer04 Unphysical chemist 4d ago

Fun fact - it's forbidden to criticise that artist on r/comics.

1

u/Snoo-41360 3d ago

I got the Roger freedmen physics book for Christmas one year, best gift ever

1

u/EconomicSeahorse Student 3d ago

No doubt you cried tears of joy

1

u/Snoo-41360 3d ago

Hell yeah best textbook I’ve ever read

1

u/sam-lb 3d ago edited 3d ago

I dunno man, I started reading Griffith's intro quantum a few weeks ago. Within the first few pages it made imprecise statements conflating probability vs probability density and claimed a blatant mathematical mistruth (acknowledged in a tiny footnote along the lines of "a competent mathematician will point out this is not true...". So why say it?) There's been a bunch more stuff like that too.

My background is pure math and I specifically chose Griffiths because I read online it was mathematically rigorous. Disappointed so far

1

u/DatBoi_BP Oscillates periodically 3d ago

Same but fifth edition 😏