So instead of a different platform, we're going to take the stance of the fudds in 1950 fighting against the AR-15? I'll take option C.
Honestly to be 100% if someone offered me one of the two right now, i would take the sig. The idea of a super hot intermediate cartridge is a good one imo, maybe that rifle isn't the one that's going to do it, but I think the concept should continue.
Well I see that it's not an intermediate cartridge, sure. Definitely not the same size. The land diameter is 6.86mm vs 7.62mm. I guess what I was meaning was using velocity to add energy vs mass. In my opinion leveraging some better manufacturing processes and maybe some metallurgy and ballistics to add energy to a rifle vs just a bigger rock makes more sense to me.
1
u/Nay_K_47 May 18 '25
So instead of a different platform, we're going to take the stance of the fudds in 1950 fighting against the AR-15? I'll take option C.
Honestly to be 100% if someone offered me one of the two right now, i would take the sig. The idea of a super hot intermediate cartridge is a good one imo, maybe that rifle isn't the one that's going to do it, but I think the concept should continue.