r/technology 23h ago

Biotechnology Burkina Faso says no to Bill Gates’ plan of creating modified species of mosquitoes

https://africa.businessinsider.com/local/lifestyle/burkina-faso-says-no-to-bill-gates-plan-of-creating-modified-species-of-mosquitoes/xyk7xm8
9.5k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

138

u/dnyank1 21h ago

I doubt taking Gate's offer would be a free lunch.

Are you confused what a philanthropist is? or...

Gates is retired from business. Over the next 20 years he wants his wealth redistributed to the global poor.

He really is doing it all for free.

18

u/DevilishlyAdvocating 20h ago

Altruism aside, aide can be problematic by giving developing nations a crutch that prevents them from developing the skills, economy or infrastructure to provide for themselves.

No opinion on this particular case but that can be the tradeoff of the "free lunch".

4

u/Lonyo 13h ago

Trying to deal with malaria isn't exactly a crutch.

Polio was almost eradicated by concerned global effort. Smallpox was eradicated

1

u/DevilishlyAdvocating 9h ago

It's a fair point, like I said I'm not commenting on this specific issue, moreso responding to:

Are you confused what a philanthropist is?

Since that is a flawed argument in this space.

6

u/ABHOR_pod 13h ago

I mean, sure. That might be true for many things like donating clothing or building roads or whatever.

I don't think there's a local industry for curing malaria in Burkina Faso. Might be an industry in treating the symptoms, but "Curing an endemic disease that has killed more humans than literally any other cause in history, for millennia." isn't exactly a local industry kind of endeavor. It's also not exactly something the free market is champing at the bit to solve.

I don't think that specific argument applies to the Gates foundation.

13

u/MrAngryBeards 20h ago

Also you really have to fully ignore the history of Africa to not see why one would be resistant to foreign aid, especially from ultra rich people from the US

1

u/DevilishlyAdvocating 20h ago

Exactly. Just because Gates might not get anything out of it doesn't mean it's a total benefit without tradeoffs. Extremely ignorant to suggest otherwise.

4

u/MrAngryBeards 19h ago

Under these circumstances, even some perfectly spotless no-strings attached aid could still be non-ideal in the long run. A lot of African countries have no proprietary solution to some of the issues they face, because foreign aid most often comes in the shape of band-aid solutions. Rarely do they make direct injection of money into government projects. When that occasionally happen, it's not no-strings-attached.

I don't entertain the thought too much because it really ruins my day but it's not hard to see why so many critics see the Gates Foundation as just a tax write-off scheme. Bill Gates is literally worth more money now than he was when he co-founded the giving pledge, even with all the hundreds of aid programs across Africa over however many years.

3

u/ThroawayJimilyJones 19h ago

Maybe because nobody would be stupid enough to put money in a government project, when the said governement has high level of corruption and constant power fight?

4

u/MrAngryBeards 19h ago

You don't have to inject money directly into the government. Ask for a plan, check the service providers involved, pay them directly, follow the development of the project. It's possible to help while being truthfully supportive instead of patronizing

4

u/Moifaso 17h ago

I'm sorry this argument is just insane in context

You know what famously is also a massive hindrance to development? Malaria.

More than half of BK's population are minors and half the country is under jihadist control. They have bigger fish to fry with their very limited resources than trying to homegrow an inferior malaria intervention.

47

u/Happycricket1 21h ago

Apparently, people mistake Bill Gates for China.

31

u/iamthewhatt 20h ago

Are you sure it isn't just people not trusting the global ultra rich after what we see happening right now?

22

u/Ok-Self5588 20h ago

Insane thing to say when the IMF and World Bank exist. Chinas foreign aid comes with unitedly fewer strings attached than western aid but keep lying to yourself that China is the imperialist hellscape in this equation

9

u/Dic3dCarrots 20h ago

Its the paradoxical enemy trope, belt and road is both a tragic economic blunder of the sad poor planned economy, and a hegemonic debt trap that the Chinese will use to steal what they will. Turns out theyre more 1950s American than anything else where they will work with any friendly regional power to develop their economic gosls even if that juices otherwise unsavvory political organizations. As long as the illicit activity doesnt happen on Chinese soil, they'll make any friendly want to be industrialist very wealthy, they just have to be willing to take direction from the ccp on global affairs and keep the local situation friendly, no matter how. China benefits from modernizing Brasils ports as much as Brasil does, the only loser is the US.

2

u/AccomplishedFail2247 20h ago

But then China owns the fucking ports, thats the problem. And 99% if all the serious news coverage is about the hegemonic debt trap side of the operation, no one’s talking about it in a negative sense. China owning most of Africa and South Americas critical infrastructure is not a good thing

6

u/el_muchacho 19h ago edited 19h ago

Once again, the debt trap is a lie. And no, China doesn't own "most Africa and SA's critical infrastructure".

0

u/Dic3dCarrots 19h ago

Lol hegemonic debt trap as if rogue states care about law suits. These include nations with with active human rights violations, CCP having an "ownership stake" means a lot less in the countries they're building ports in. and the ports that matter today are what they are funding in Brasil. Also, again, compare that to anything offered by the west, maybe WE dont like it, but some of these countries have no other options than China, and China has already forgiven some of the loans, but like everything, these are complex issues with people involved. There are 155 countries with BRI projects in them. I think ypu could find plenty examples of fraud waste and abuse in any human system. Some possible third of the countries have more debt due to chinese loans than they would from what analysts predict they would from Paris Club countries, but there might be other benefits for former colonized countries to take assistance from China instead of the West.

-2

u/el_muchacho 19h ago edited 19h ago

This post is so replete with falsehoods I don't even know where to start. I guess $1.6 billion of anti China propaganda has a toll on minds.

1) Claim: "belt and road is a tragic economic blunder of the sad poor planned economy"

Truth: BRI is a widely successful policy, that made China the first trade partner of more than 120 countries. There are 195 countries (including Palestine and Vatican). It's in fact so successful that the US tried to copy it, but it predictably fell flat.

2) Claim: ... and a hegemonic debt trap

Truth: there is simply NO chinese debt trap diplomacy. That's just another lie that has been debunked for years.

3) ... that the Chinese will use to steal what they will

Americans used to say that about their black slaves. And colonizers used this slur all the time.

4) Claim: Turns out theyre more 1950s American than anything else where they will work with any friendly regional power to develop their economic gosls even if that juices otherwise unsavvory political organizations.

Truth: Even on US history, you are wrong, that's not how the 1950s USA operated. The US would use the CIA to depose local leaders (sometimes democratically elected), like in Guatemala in 1954, to impose a pro- american business puppet. China does no such thing, quite the opposite, it doesn't set political conditions, it works with the government in place without interfering in interior politics as a principle. You may disagree with this principle, but the western policy which imposes their conditions is hardly ever better,

5

u/Dic3dCarrots 19h ago edited 19h ago

Your reading comprehension sucks. You're not disagreeing with my comment. My comment was that those false statements propogated in the west to hand wave away BRI are paradoxical. My point about 1950s america is that we built in countries friendly to our interests and used dollar deplomacy to fund unsavvory regimes, just like China is.

Do better ai

-5

u/el_muchacho 19h ago edited 19h ago

Do better ai

Cool, now you are insulting me. I didn't use AI. You realize how much time I spent to write this post ? No you don't. Reddit is an international website, perhaps you could figure out that not everyone's mother tongue is english. And your post is badly written as if that was your point, it doesn't come across clearly.

3

u/Dic3dCarrots 18h ago edited 18h ago

What ever ai translator you used tragically failed you -.-

Maybe next time, dont skip the first phrase of a post when responding. Pro tip, when reading English, the first phrase is generally important :)

-61

u/Qu1ckShake 21h ago

I would love to be as hideously, disgustingly naive as you.

Must be peaceful.

0

u/ArkhielModding 20h ago

We don't buy the OnlyFree

-64

u/tlm94 21h ago

for absolutely no ulterior motive whatsoever, right??

39

u/Popular_Brief335 21h ago

Sure to make his name immortal. Gates does more for the nations of Africa than then the nations of Africa do for each other 

14

u/fred11551 21h ago

I mean the ulterior motive is good publicity to make people forget all the scummy things he’s done to amass that fortune and maybe distract from any news involving him and Epstein. But like, that’s not a problem for Burkina Faso. They get free help with Malaria and Bill Gayes gets to pretend that good he’s doing now outweighs the bad he did in the past

46

u/dnyank1 21h ago

Yes. Genuinely, if you think Bill Gates is part of some global cabal trying to influence power dynamics, you've been force fed propaganda.

I've met the man! Heard him speak. He's genuine and passionate about leaving the world a better place than he found it.

Why is it so hard to believe someone might want to act altruistically, to you fucking ghouls?

Can you not imagine doing something out of kindness for other humans (or maybe even a little guilt? remorse? Who fucking knows, who fucking cares - but it's obvious his motives are not "ulterior", power or profit driven)

0

u/Cool_Lab_1362 21h ago

Typical cynical person. To the average person they wouldn't have personally met Bill Gates and that public figure is a stranger to them. So no they wouldn't assume Gates not having any ulterior motives, it's a given by default to distrust the utmost elite rich and powerful nowadays regardless of public perception.

-10

u/[deleted] 21h ago edited 21h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/RustyGuns 21h ago

Imagine living life the way you do.

-5

u/[deleted] 21h ago

Happy and retired early? Yeah it’s tits.

5

u/Mammoth-Dot-9002 21h ago

He is an oligarch who gained power through owning a tech monopoly. But there are still kids dying from malaria. There’s nuance here - don’t be a douche. This is why the left has no power.

-13

u/[deleted] 21h ago

I’m talking to bots aren’t I?

1

u/[deleted] 21h ago edited 20h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-10

u/FoodLionDrPerky 21h ago

Can you not imagine doing something out of kindness for other humans (or maybe even a little guilt? remorse? Who fucking knows, who fucking cares - but it's obvious his motives are not "ulterior", power or profit driven)

Yes I can. I'm just not naive enough to think that's what's going on here. Bill Gates and others like him "helping" African nations is nothing more than a form of soft power. It's the same as foreign aid. It might genuinely help some people, but that's rarely the actual goal of the person/company/nation/whatever "helping". More often than not it's actually about gaining influence in the region.

6

u/Hotoelectron 20h ago

It's Africa. If he wants 'soft power' or 'influence', he can buy it for cheaper by just paying a bribe. Like, how dumb is this conspiracy theory?

4

u/dnyank1 21h ago

It's the same as foreign aid

You think actually think Bill Gates is doing this for... the bidding of the US Government? To advance some political agenda? lmfao

What "influence" does a guy whose last business endeavor was the failed Microsoft Zune MP3 player, seek? What "soft power" does he want?

Christ almighty this thread is proving I need to invest in aluminum foil manufacturers... hat sales are at all time highs

9

u/Mind_Extract 21h ago

Wow your vague sarcasm in a manic tone has convinced me

2

u/ProgressBartender 20h ago

Warren Buffet convinced Bill Gates to join him in committing to giving away all his wealth before he dies.

2

u/Soft_Walrus_3605 21h ago

What's it like thinking there are no good people in the world? Or at least people who are able to do good?

-3

u/hpayandah 20h ago

isn’t he the guy who was buddy with epstein? only time will tell