I'd genuinely take Wired more seriously if a single person came out to say Chorus reprimanded them for not following the contract

[u/FriendlyDrummers]

People were cited voicing concerns of the contract. That's fair. But, there is no one who has said they've been reprimanded for not following it.

The I Had It Pod, a couple of white women (who I adore), are featured on the homepage of Chorus. They are platformed and advertised on chorus.

These ladies have lambasted the DNC, often talked about Palestine and the genocide supporting Democrats, and call out Democrats for not supporting Mamdani.

They had Mamdani in their podcast.

They had Hasan, the biggest leftist influencer in the entire world, who famously hates liberals, on. They showered him with praise.

In what world is platforming and praising Hasan propaganda for the DNC? And there are more.

One influencer has said she does whatever she wants. She interviews whoever she wants, she's told people about her membership without letting chorus know, she publicly blasts the Democrat party. She wants Cory Booker fired. She calls out their support for Israel.

There is another influencer who calls out Zionist Democrats, who is also featured on the Chorus homepage.

None of this is "pushing the party line." Even if you have issues with David's coverage of the conflict and overall support for the DNC, he's been consistent about his tone for years. A program 6 weeks old has not effected his content whatsoever.

I just feel like this is so painfully obvious.

Disclaimer: this is not to debate the Palestinian conflict. Simply the accusations of calling Chorus a Zionist program, when the content creators are adamantly against Netanyahu.

[u/FriendlyDrummers]

Oh, so we're moving the goal post. Suddenly, "threatening to sue is like Trump" doesn't apply. Got it.

David didn't even threaten to sue. Did you watch the video? He said it would cost 6 figures and a year, with no guarantee of success. It's to address people telling him to sue.

You're just reciting talking points.

[u/FriendlyDrummers → u/[deleted]]

"a lawsuit would cost 6 figures and last a year, that's why I'm not pursuing a lawsuit that people are asking about."

That's not a threat.

[u/FriendlyDrummers → u/[deleted]]

All of his videos are clickbait. So are Hasan's videos.

I don't care if he doesn't have a chance at suing. I never said he did, David didn't either.

The debate was if David was threatening to sue. He didn't. Whatever you're saying is irrelevant to that point.

[u/FriendlyDrummers → u/[deleted]]

Hasan is the biggest leftist influencer in the entire world. In part because he uses clickbait. But I suppose suddenly that's a sin to want to stay relevant in a competitive online space

Again, the context. Some of Pakman's watchers have asked why he doesn't hire a lawyer. He replied that he talked to a lawyer and stated in the video why he wouldn't pursue a lawsuit.

Stop parroting talking points. He didn't threaten anyone.

[u/FriendlyDrummers → u/[deleted]]

"I didn't watch the video, he's threatening because of a click bait, and he's wrong to use clickbait , also it's a threat to say he consulted a lawyer even though he said he wouldn't sue"

The way you hop scotch between talking points. Absolutely you parrot. If you cared you would watch the video you're criticizing.