r/whowouldwin Mar 11 '19

Event The Great Debate Season 7 Round 2!!!

Rules


Out of Tier Rules

  • For Out of Tier requests, simply ping myself and/or Chainsaw__Monkey and state your case for why you believe someone's combatant is out of tier, then proceed with the debate as per normal. We will evaluate that request individual of the debate itself and make our decision in judgments. A short defense of the OOT is acceptable, a prolonged debate over it will be outright ignored


Battle Rules

  • Speed is to be equalized to a base of 50 m/s combat and movement speed, with their reactions scaled down/up relatively. Speed boosts via abilities, however, are indeed allowed to make one surpass this base speed threshold. Projectile speed maintains relative velocity compared to the combatant it originates from; a human scaled up to this speed firing a gun means their bullet moves as fast to a person moving 50 m/s as a bullet does to us as normal humans.

  • Battleground: The Great Debate arena has traveled across fiction, from a coliseum, to the Mines of Moria, to Asgard herself. Now, however, we bring the Great Debate to the real world: Enjoy destroying parts of the Panama Canal. A multiple-kilometer-long canal through which much trade and cargo moves via freight boat, the Canal consists of a series of locks which are 320 meters long, 33 meters in width, and 41 meters deep. The battlefield itself will be 3 locks long, and an additional 100 meters width extending beyond the locks' width. Each lock will be filled to the brim with ocean water, and contain a 50 meter long, 20 meter wide, 10 meter tall battleship (with no armaments of any sort, yet it has full oil and fuel) in the exact center of the lock. Combatants start opposite each other, with either team opposite the middlemost lock of the battlefield, facing each other from across the lock just 10 meters to the left of the battleship in it, standing 5 meters back from the lock and in a line spaced 2 meters apart from their allies. Every combatant starts each round being 'teleported' into the arena, knowing full well whomever they face down needs to die or be incapacitated in order for they themselves to advance and win and will do so, and with knowledge of their allies' weapons and abilities. All combatants begin without any weapons drawn or abilities active, hands idle at their sides, weapons holstered, and the moment they teleport in they can begin combat. All combatants are in-character for the tourney itself. Of special note: the edge of the arena consists of a thick wall of unobtanium, a non-magnetic, non-conducting alloy with infinite density that is impossible to manipulate or harm and exists outside the laws of physics, coming to a dome that covers the entire arena. Contestants slammed into it will indeed be harmed by the impact, but suffer no drawbacks from the infinite density.



Submission Rules

  • Tier: Must be able to win an unlikely victory, draw/near draw, or likely victory against Neo in the conditions outlined above. All entrants will be bloodlusted against Neo, meaning they will act fully rationally and put down their opponent in the quickest, most efficient manner possible regardless of morality, utilizing any and all possible techniques/tactics/attacks if necessary. The bloodlust does not give any foreknowledge of Neo or his capabilities.


Debate Rules

  • Rounds will last 4-5 days, hopefully from Monday until Thursday or Friday of each week of the tourney; there is a 48 hour time limit both on starting (we do not care who starts, you and your opponent can figure that out) AND on responses, AND ADDITIONALLY each user MUST get in two responses or else be disqualified. If one user waits until the very last minute to force this rule to DQ their opponent without any forewarning to their opponents or the tournament supervisors, they will be removed from this tournament, no exceptions.

  • Format for each round: both respondents get Intro + 1st Response, then 2nd response, then a 3rd response and closing statement individual of one another that can be posted any time after both 3rd responses are complete. EACH RESPONSE MUST BE NO LONGER THAN THREE REDDIT COMMENTS LONG WITH A HARD CAP OF 25,000 CHARACTERS SPLIT BETWEEN THE THREE.

  • Rounds will either be a full 3v3 Team Match, or 1v1 single matches. 1v1 matches are determined by randomization. Match format will switch every round, with Team Matches always followed by single matches, and vice versa. First Round will be determined by coin flip.



Brackets Here

Last round was 3v3, thus this round shall be:

1v1 Individual Fights

Round 2 Ends Friday March 15th, 23:59 CST

  • Format for each round: both respondents get Intro + 1st Response, then 2nd response, then a 3rd response and closing statement individual of one another that can be posted any time after both 3rd responses are complete. EACH RESPONSE MUST BE NO LONGER THAN THREE REDDIT COMMENTS LONG WITH A HARD CAP OF 25,000 CHARACTERS SPLIT BETWEEN THE THREE.

  • Rounds will either be a full 3v3 Team Match, or 1v1 single matches. 1v1 matches are randomized based on sign up order via an internet list randomizer. Match format will switch every round, with Team Matches always followed by single matches, and vice versa. First Round will be determined by coin flip, and as it is 3v3s, next shall be 1v1, and so on and so forth.

  • Randomization is as follows: Taking from sign-up order:

    • 1st Combatant vs 3rd Combatant
    • 2nd Combatant vs 1st Combatant
    • 3rd Combatant vs 2nd Combatant


Links to:

Hype Post

Sign Ups

Tribunal

Round 1

11 Upvotes

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/feminist-horsebane Mar 15 '19

Response Three:

Part I: Sakura vs. Roshi conclusion

The ice blocks make rather significant sized holes within the concrete they embed them into as we can see within the scan

So, strong enough to break concrete? Because Roshi can do that with the tip of his foot. If that’s the requirement to beat these shields, they’re not lasting long.

especially when considering Sakura has innate blunt durability in comparison. As per your admission during Response 1, Sakura is liable to take a hit or two from Roshi even without a durability buff.

She can take one or two attacks before dying/being KO’d. But she doesn’t have any resistance to pressure point attacks, which will immobilize her, making her an easy target. Besides, how long do you think it will take for Master Roshi, the God of Martial Arts, to land sufficient hits on her- especially since she has no recourse in a CQC fight, as she can’t very well summon Sword while being pummeled. Not to mention that again, giving an untrained ten year old girl a sword against a master martial artist is hardly anything that would level the playing field.

Sakura having upscaled speed means her somatic/verbal components would be done faster by nature of the tournament with the telegraph time being much shorter than you are suggesting

But she doesn’t have upscaled speed. The speed that her tournament is set at is faster than her normal speed, but that doesn’t give her the ability to say all of her attacks in the fraction of a second. It just means she’s as fast relative to 50 m/s as she normally would be. Her own respect thread confirms that she has no superhuman speed or reaction. Nowhere in it does it mention her having faster reactions, or being able to talk faster than a regular human being. You’re taking two scans that contradict all the evidence that her spells are cast in normal time, and saying that actually, those two scans are the only ones that are accurate. When a feat this inconsistent is presented, we treat it as an outlier as we rightly should, rather than trying to reverse-engineer every other feat we’ve seen to be compatible with it.

I was arguing that raising the point of having better reactions naturally doesn't matter for the sake of this tourney as all reactions are equalized.

Reactions are not equalized, they’re scaled; "Speed is to be equalized to a base of 50 m/s combat and movement speed, with their reactions scaled down/up relatively"

Roshi's ability to resist her more esoteric means of combat (sword, freeze, disintegrate), have went uncontested.

This is not true. Sword has been talked about at length. The time it takes to cast is just too much. Freeze is viable, but she would have to know to open with it over any of her other attacks, the cast time doesn’t give her the ability to use shield in time. Disintegrate, per your own admission in response two, is not something she would use in character on an old man as soon as the fight starts. You claim she won't use it on an old man charging at her, but you don't provide a reason why.Conclusion: Sakura has horrid durability and even worse cast times. Two inconsistent scans do not change that, especially when they’re being interpreted differently from how the respect thread tells us to interpret them. For order for her to win this fight, she would have to know to immediately open with the only attack that is fast enough to hit Roshi. She would need to have perfect aim and not fall for any after-images, and tag a . The window of opportunity for her to win this fight is just too small. This is an easy win for Roshi.

Part II: Roboute vs. Vader

Against an opponent of far greater strength? Being able to block his blows is absolutely skill

It just isn’t. Withstanding applied force is durability. If I swing a sledgehammer at a concrete pillar, and the pillar doesn't break, does that make the pillar "skilled"? Of course not. Being able to block an attack from a strong opponent and take minimal damage is a durability feat. There is nothing here that suggests that he is able to contend with an extremely talented master duelist. The claim that blocking a strike from a stronger opponent makes him as skilled as Vader is just silly.

He outright throws at least 72 tons worth of weight

I’d question whether “same size” means “same weight.” Per your own admission when you say it’s “likely heavier”, you’re admitting we don’t have the actual weight of this thing he’s tossing.

A third party source also isn't exactly the greatest source of weight figures, and even from casual eyeballing, it would look as though a Land Raider has significantly more mass than a single AT-AT leg despite being somewhat smaller over all.

Again, per your own admission, Land Raiders are mostly hollow, whereas the legs of AT AT’s are not. And as has gone unaddressed, Vader is supporting the weight of the entire AT AT as it rests on that leg.

Also worth bringing up is that my opponent has not demonstrated Guilliman would even be hurt by Vader's lightsaber due to the 100 million degree feat shown by a weaker character earlier who as depicted on the cover art of Betrayer linked earlier, does not wear helmets either.

So, because a similar character once didn’t wear a helmet and at another time and place was hurt by a 100 million degree explosion- we’re assuming that all Primarchs have the same heat durability whether they’re armored or not? That’s just too hard of a sell for me.

Things like Guilliman's massive reach advantage by being larger and having a bigger weapon

Him being bigger also makes him much less maneuverable at close range. Vader kills things bigger than him all the time.

the coin toss of him wearing a helmet

The feats we’re given to measure his durability show that a headshot is a viable way to take him down. As such, that’s how he’s being interpreted.

Conclusion: it doesn't matter how strong Roboute is if he can't hit his opponent. He has no skill feats, and the wonky scaling presented here doesn't make him a swordsman on par with Vader, or anywhere close. He has no answer to the passive precognition that Vader uses in his fights. He may be durable, but he is not without weakness. Even if Roboute can resist his TK, he still is little more than a flailing beast in this fight.

Continued below

1

u/feminist-horsebane Mar 15 '19

Part III: Thor vs. Superman preface; Out of Tier Request

First of all, u/Verlux I would like to request an out of tier tribunal for Thor. As my opponent is attempting to argue Thor Odinson, he is blatantly above tier and will one shot Tier Setter Neo in a heartbeat.

This is my opponents interpretation of the fight Thor will be in against Superman (who, like Neo, by my own admission has no lightning resistance):

Against Superman who is in an unknown to him AND in conditions where he knows he must defeat Superman, he aboslute would start with a lightning shock or lightning charged attack

This is also applicable to Neo. Even more so, given that tribunals are bloodlusted. So right off the bat, Neo gets one shot apparently. But if he somehow dodges, and that doesn't happen;

He is not at significant striking advantage against Superman...and even if grappled...he can still conjure lightning to shock Superman once in range.

This, again, also applies to Neo. So, even at close range, Neo still would be one shot by a bloodlusted Thor. Continuing;

If they decide to man-fight it out, a lightning charged attack is all it really takes to stop Superman

This is still applicable to Neo. If these lightning attacks are an insta-win for Thor, then there’s no way that Neo- who lacks any resistance to lightning or means of attack outside of melee combat- could ever win.

Now, with that out of the way;
Part III: Thor vs. Superman

Because this is a striking feat and not a durability one? Compared to say this, Thor has a much bigger radius of shattered street and the shockwave propagates much further than Superman's clash with Zod

He's breaking apart a courtyard, whereas the shockwave in the Supes/Zod one seems to be blocks.

In addition, Thor wouldn't be one-shot as we know Thor's durability can manage against opponents with stronger strength than himself, namely Hulk

The only scaling you’ve provided in this fight for Thor’s durability is scaling him to a feat which has been shown to be an outlier. As such, we have no idea what his actual durability is, since you rested your entire claim that he’s durable enough to withstand Superman’s blows on a singular extremely flawed scan.

While Frost Giants have no demonstrated heat durability beyond presumably having ice powers, the thing which I wanted to showcase earlier is that Thor is able to tank a beam from Gungnir which vaporized them. Heat based vaporization takes no small amount of yield to perform

On a being made of ice? You need to heat them up enough for them to evaporate. All this show is that an attack hot enough to evaporate ice isn’t enough to meaningfully damage Thor. Supermans heat vision vaporizes a tunnel of ice, of much bigger size than any ice giant. And given that Thor isn’t tanking this attack as much as you can say, we can assume his heat vision is enough to damage him.

No one said anything about long range sniping. Zapping someone before you get into touching range versus sniping people are two hugely different things. In addition, Thor literally uses lightning to help kill Ultron. To your point about the Destroyer and Hulk, he was capable of rather easily defeating the destroyer in the part you linked, and he actively needed Hulk to be functional later on against Loki. There are in-character reasons for him to do that.

So, seems like this is the crux of the argument we’ve got going here; Does Thor open with lightning, or not? You’re claiming he will based off of two scans.

Let’s go through all the fights Thor takes place in up until Ragnarok. You’re including fodder villains like this nameless Leviathan, so i’m going to do the same.

1)Frost giants on Jotunheim- doesn’t use lightning.

2)Destroyer on Earth- doesn’t use lightning.

3)Loki on Asgard- doesn’t open with lightning, but uses it towards the end.4)Tony Stark- uses lightning, doesn’t open with it.

5)Hulk- doesn’t use lightning at all. Though fair, there are in character reasons.

6)Leviathans- opens with lightning. However, he opens with it because Cap has literally instructed him to do this- “you’ve got the lightning, light the bastards up.” It isn’t an in character behavior, he has to be told to do it.

7)Rock Giants- doesn’t open with lightning.

8)Malekeith (R1)- opens with lightning.

9)Kurse- doesn’t use lightning

10)Malekeith (r2)- opens with lightning.

11)HYDRA- doesn’t open with lightning

12)Ultron Bots- doesn’t use lightning

13)Quicksilver/Scarlet Witch- doesn’t use lightning

14)Ultron- uses lightning, doesn’t open with it

Continued below

1

u/feminist-horsebane Mar 15 '19

So, we have fourteen fights. Three of them, he opens with lightning-one of those is discounted for the explained reasons- so, two. Four of them, he uses it, but not as an opener. Seven times, he fights without using the lightning at all. That means that 50% of his fights, he doesn’t use the lightning at all.

And given how thor’s first instinct later on during Infinity War was to strike Thanos first with lightning-

Couple reason this doesn’t work. First, you’ve specified “pre-ragnarok”. That doesn’t just mean that he doesn’t have the combat feats from Ragnarok on, it means he doesn’t get the experience too. You can’t pick and choose without stipulating. Thor had two movies of character development and learning between when you’re using him and when this happens. It’s inadmissable as evidence, by your own stipulations.

Second of all, even if you could do this, you’re missing the context. He’s seen Thanos take apart the Hulk (as well as all of the other earth-bound Avengers) in prior encounters, he know how dangerous he is up close, and has only gotten more dangerous. In other words, he has meta knowledge. He won’t have that against Superman. So he’s going to open as he typically would.

Due to the nature of the tournament putting characters in an “in it to win it” mentality

When is Thor- or anyone else- ever not ‘in it to win it’ in a fight? Treating the rules of the tournament as if it’s “bloodlusted lite” is disingenuous. The characters are in character. They fight as they would in character. In character, Thor has a 14% chance of opening with his lightning, as opposed to a 50% that he won’t use it at all.

He is not at a significant striking advantage against Superman

You’ve demonstrated one striking feat that requires an amp, his casual striking is still leagues below Supermans.

I am also unsure why my opponent writes of gungnir as “unquantifiable”

Because as per your own admission, “the Frost Giants have no heat durability”. We don’t know how strong the blast is, we just know it's enough to destroy ice, which is still much below Superman’s heat vision.

Conclusion: As argued, Thor Odinson is out of tier, because he’ll use his lightning to insta-win at the drop of a hat. My opponent has rested his entire claim to Thor winning the fight on an out of character behavior of Thor instantly one-shotting with lightning. When told that his only durability feat presented was a massive outlier, my opponent failed to provide any real durability feats for Thor, meaning we have no evidence in this debate as to his actual durability. If it’s unquantified, there’s no reason to believe that Superman can’t just one shot him. In character, the two enter a hand to hand fight, which Superman loses due to inferior striking power, lifting strength, and durability. This should result in an easy win for Superman.

1

u/British_Tea_Company Mar 15 '19

Closing Statements

Sakura - Touched upon earlier by my opponent was the fact that Sakura speaks in-real time as shown on-screen, a thing which I have provided counter-evidence for with instances of Sakura being able to say the incantation and perform the hand motions in short timeframes or demonstrate that if Sakura is not in the focus of the screen, her spells are quite fast. With a combination of having many attacks which Roshi has little resistance to, melee abilities which can still one-shot Roshi, and the ability to control the battlefield and reposition, I believe Sakura is the winner of this battle.

Guilliman - While my opponent argued that Guilliman's lack of skill feats versus Vader's superior skill which would grant him the headshot and win, Vader's skill advantage is not as clear cut as it seems, demonstrating from Guilliman's ability to block axe blows from creatures much stronger than he is. Vader's TK is likely to not serve any help to him overall, as his best feat of holding up a single leg does not seem to be nearly as impressive as Guilliman being able to outright lift through several hundred tons as written, or just outright throwing an object weighing around or above 72 tons while injured. Coupled with the IMMENSE heat durability from Primarchs as demonstrated from Lorgar, it is unlikely Guilliman is even capable of losing this battle as he outright cannot be hurt by Vader.

Thor - While there is a distinct lack of good lifting feats on par with Superman on the side of Thor, the disadvantage is not as bad as it would appear on paper due to Thor having his own in terms of lightning based attacks. While Thor has great durability relating to blunt force, heat and some scaling from Heimdall suggests he would not have bad cold resistance either, Superman solely locks in the electricity department. This is the edge Thor needs which allows him to beat Superman.

Alright. Good luck on the judgments.